<![CDATA['93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware)]]>I was bored today so I thought I would take it out for a couple pictures:

(I think some mud flaps might be in order...)
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
legacy image
and yes that is a sandbag 😛
legacy image

As for plans I would like to finish acquiring the replacement parts I need and get those installed, and then in order get an exhaust system by Remus, Turner Motorsports chip, a better intake, and stainless steel brake lines.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/5702/93-bmw-photo-shoot-56k-bewareRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 07:35:37 GMTMon, 20 Feb 2006 20:49:30 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:26:18 GMT]]>good point, yes ITBs and tricky valves will do that to an engine

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93353https://fargostreet.com/post/93353Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:26:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:23:47 GMT]]>

nissankingcab wrote:
255hp out of an NA 3L is pretty amazing.

I'm with Jim on this one... 330 hp out of 3.2L is much more impressive. 7% more displacement, 30% more hp. That's impressive.

Anyways, love the color of your car - very nice

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93338https://fargostreet.com/post/93338Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:23:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:01:04 GMT]]>Bryce is right they were mounted on it when I got it. If I can sell my pickup in time I will get some nice winter tires for the stock wheels that I also got with the car (tires are shot though).

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93337https://fargostreet.com/post/93337Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:01:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:53:35 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
:sigh: poor car.

you planning on leaving those wheels on through winter?
He got the wheels with the car.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93335https://fargostreet.com/post/93335Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:53:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:50:56 GMT]]>:sigh: poor car.

you planning on leaving those wheels on through winter?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93334https://fargostreet.com/post/93334Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:50:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:23:43 GMT]]>I can tell. Personally I like the E90s myself. 255hp out of an NA 3L is pretty amazing.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93332https://fargostreet.com/post/93332Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:23:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:19:34 GMT]]>Ah, just my opinion.

I'm in love with E46 BMW's...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93331https://fargostreet.com/post/93331Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:19:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:12:37 GMT]]>and besides I think the exterior looks fine as is.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93326https://fargostreet.com/post/93326Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:12:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:11:06 GMT]]>What I meant by performance was just basic bolt-ons, chip, and maybe cams down the road. I'm not looking to go 12s, I just want some more everyday power, that is all. Sorry for any confusion.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93324https://fargostreet.com/post/93324Tue, 21 Feb 2006 01:11:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:49:11 GMT]]>Performance? Its going to be really expensive on a 325i E36 to get any real power...

Even the M3 E36 guys end up supercharging to get any big power...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93319https://fargostreet.com/post/93319Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:49:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:54:41 GMT]]>After riding in your car, I love it. All the little luxury toys on the inside are awesome.

Can't wait to get a real ride in it this summer....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93306https://fargostreet.com/post/93306Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:54:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:43:06 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
Suggestions:

E46 M3 Front Bumper and some sort of side skirts
LED Tail Lights
Projector headlights w/ HID and Angel Eyes
Painted Moldings
Drop
Remove the wierd gas gover thing

Good suggestions but too much money that I could be putting into performance.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93304https://fargostreet.com/post/93304Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:43:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:29:44 GMT]]>Suggestions:

E46 M3 Front Bumper and some sort of side skirts
LED Tail Lights
Projector headlights w/ HID and Angel Eyes
Painted Moldings
Drop
Remove the wierd gas gover thing

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93303https://fargostreet.com/post/93303Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:29:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:03:27 GMT]]>Yeah that was there when I got the car, its just stuck on with adhesive. I'm sure SLD could remove it without too much trouble. I need to head there anyway for my saggy headliner.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93298https://fargostreet.com/post/93298Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:03:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:42:51 GMT]]>are you going to replace the gas filler lid?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93297https://fargostreet.com/post/93297Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:42:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:39:09 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
actually its a bimmer...bikes are beamers

you know what i meant.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93295https://fargostreet.com/post/93295Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:39:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:10:04 GMT]]>

d^flex wrote:
nice lookin beemer

actually its a bimmer...bikes are beamers

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93294https://fargostreet.com/post/93294Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:10:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:47:29 GMT]]>Rice, but your rice, and rice can be nice. 🙂

Your car hot Paul.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93291https://fargostreet.com/post/93291Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:47:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '93 BMW photo shoot (56k beware) on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:45:42 GMT]]>nice lookin beemer

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/93290https://fargostreet.com/post/93290Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:45:42 GMT