<![CDATA[Fast and the furious 3]]>Good Lord it made it through production adn is going to come out.

http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/thefastandthefurioustokyodrift.html;_ylt=Ai7VmpnZ_lrwuKq.ASa2pQZfVXcA

Ricers Unite!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/5875/fast-and-the-furious-3RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 18:23:00 GMTFri, 17 Mar 2006 04:06:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:12:06 GMT]]>

TakeYourTopOff wrote:
Lets face it Vin and the supra made the 1st movie

Da truf. :icon_rr:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95616https://fargostreet.com/post/95616Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:12:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:06:48 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
there actually was a story in the 2nd one...way better actual movie...the tie in with street racing was retarded...the first one had better actual car relevance but the movie itself was horrible...maybe this one will be a happy medium...ha! "drift race" time...

I guess I actually don't think any of the "stories" are good but I do watch the movies just to see the cars and the stunt driving/special effects

Tad218 wrote:
kinda sucks paul walker isnt in it
actually i was thinking the opposite I don't think he's a very good actor but it also sucks that bow wow is in it

Lets face it Vin and the supra/mopar/rx made the 1st movie and the cutie that walkers character slept with

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95605https://fargostreet.com/post/95605Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:06:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:52:17 GMT]]>kinda sucks paul walker isnt in it

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95598https://fargostreet.com/post/95598Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:52:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:24:28 GMT]]>If mine is done, and I'm here (and not England) then I will put a 'for sale' sign in my car's window, and it will say the following:

Super Sileighty JDM Drift Machine - $20,000
JDM motor and drift parts, will automatically make new owner good at drifting.

Should be a good time. The main actor isn't actually all that bad, IMO. His role in 'Jarhead' was pretty funny, I thought.

Swoff: Yeah, I'm gonna call her!
Kreuger: Yeah, you should! Even if Jodie is fucking her!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95597https://fargostreet.com/post/95597Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:24:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:26:45 GMT]]>

TakeYourTopOff wrote:
And the story was good on the 2nd one?????

there actually was a story in the 2nd one...way better actual movie...the tie in with street racing was retarded...the first one had better actual car relevance but the movie itself was horrible...maybe this one will be a happy medium...ha! "drift race" time...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95580https://fargostreet.com/post/95580Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:26:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:20:50 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
haha yeah my car will be finished by then too...we can just park in a parking lot with for sale signs...
On tintmasters there was a talk about it. alot off the guys up there said they want to come down and do that just as a joke 400 whp JDM Drift Machine Yo LOL
ill put the hatch for like $20K:icon_joker: and the coupe for $6K but i intend to sell my coupe though

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95578https://fargostreet.com/post/95578Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:20:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:14:41 GMT]]>

krzydrftr93 wrote:
Dont we already have this????
there will be more....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95577https://fargostreet.com/post/95577Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:14:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:10:28 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
I dont care, I'm SO there at the first showing.

I'm a ricer; I'll admit the first one got me really wanting an import, few months later I had a Blitz kit, green street glow and all that.

They should bring back paul walker and vin disel, ja rule and tyrese; and have a big gang fight or something

LOL I was just thinking how everyone was ragging on this but how many people will go see it either in theater or DVD.... I'll probaby wait for blockbuster mailing of the DVD

pin wrote:
The plot sounds weak, but the car action looks great.

And the story was good on the 2nd one?????

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95575https://fargostreet.com/post/95575Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:10:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:02:08 GMT]]>drifting is ghey....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95574https://fargostreet.com/post/95574Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:02:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:42:17 GMT]]>

Jim wrote:
I dont care, I'm SO there at the first showing.
I'm camping out at the theater starting May 1 :icon_cyclops:
Who's with me?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95570https://fargostreet.com/post/95570Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:42:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:52:23 GMT]]>

2.5RS wrote:
ya..... or, every teenage punk ass kid in his parents car is going to be e-braking it around every corner for a while...... thats just what fargo needs

Dont we already have this????

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95562https://fargostreet.com/post/95562Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:52:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:33:30 GMT]]>

A853 wrote:
Well the cars look nice; wonder how bad the graphics are... like how fake they are..

If they are bad like Torque, I'll be mad..
which i thought was funny how they made fun of fast/n/the furious when there graphics were horse shit

I heard they used a variety of new camera techniques for filming so they wouldn't have to turn to CGI unless absolutely necessary. I'm hoping this is true at least, some movies are better with CGI but when cars and racing are involved it should be the real thing, maybe a camera trick here and there but no CGI or at least as little as possible.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95558https://fargostreet.com/post/95558Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:33:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:37:11 GMT]]>

97jeep wrote:
now i know when the other car need to get together and lookin decent to sell it to some ricer after the movie:icon_thumright: for a beautiful price

haha yeah my car will be finished by then too...we can just park in a parking lot with for sale signs...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95554https://fargostreet.com/post/95554Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:37:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:35:30 GMT]]>I dont care, I'm SO there at the first showing.

I'm a ricer; I'll admit the first one got me really wanting an import, few months later I had a Blitz kit, green street glow and all that.

They should bring back paul walker and vin disel, ja rule and tyrese; and have a big gang fight or something

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95551https://fargostreet.com/post/95551Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:35:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:13:53 GMT]]>Well the cars look nice; wonder how bad the graphics are... like how fake they are..

If they are bad like Torque, I'll be mad..
which i thought was funny how they made fun of fast/n/the furious when there graphics were horse shit

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95549https://fargostreet.com/post/95549Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:13:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:10:31 GMT]]>The plot sounds weak, but the car action looks great.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95548https://fargostreet.com/post/95548Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:10:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:49:42 GMT]]>

torbs wrote:
^^^ very true, it might actually be positive in that respect. More people at auto-x and local events is a good thing.
ya..... or, every teenage punk ass kid in his parents car is going to be e-braking it around every corner for a while...... thats just what fargo needs

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95547https://fargostreet.com/post/95547Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:49:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:43:31 GMT]]>^^^ very true, it might actually be positive in that respect. More people at auto-x and local events is a good thing.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95546https://fargostreet.com/post/95546Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:43:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:36:50 GMT]]>Hey; I bet we all go watch it...
It'll put a racing to a diff. level and maybe ppl will be inspired more to go drift/x-cross

I wouldn't mind seeing it on the big-screen

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95545https://fargostreet.com/post/95545Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:36:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:16:51 GMT]]>Oh great another catch phrase to get driven into the fricken ground.
"SPEED NEEDS NO TRANSLATION"
Then again it'll be another movie to make fun of also, so at least there's an upside.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95538https://fargostreet.com/post/95538Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:16:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:29:33 GMT]]>now i know when the other car need to get together and lookin decent to sell it to some ricer after the movie:icon_thumright: for a beautiful price

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95520https://fargostreet.com/post/95520Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:29:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Fast and the furious 3 on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:25:18 GMT]]>omfg that looks retarded....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/95519https://fargostreet.com/post/95519Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:25:18 GMT