<![CDATA[I'm calling out HandoEX]]>I challenge you to an e-duel!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/6122/i-m-calling-out-handoexRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:51:41 GMTMon, 10 Apr 2006 15:54:13 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:51:01 GMT]]>oh snap!

50stang, the lady before me was 60 and honestly didn't do a thing to it. I do have some dyno time coming soon so I will finally know how much power its actually putting out.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98459https://fargostreet.com/post/98459Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:51:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:38:32 GMT]]>you guys are all gay, im the fastest 🙂

CMK vs. youngin2nr

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98448https://fargostreet.com/post/98448Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:38:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:30:43 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
LOL, I'm pretty sure Chris knows he's not the fastest car on this site.

Yeah he does... and for the record I do believe his time slip is authentic. I just think his car has something more done to it then he is aware of from some past owner.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98447https://fargostreet.com/post/98447Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:30:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:16:58 GMT]]>LOL, I'm pretty sure Chris knows he's not the fastest car on this site.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98444https://fargostreet.com/post/98444Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:16:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:34:37 GMT]]>I shoulda known that someone would take this seriously... :lol:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98434https://fargostreet.com/post/98434Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:34:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:19:15 GMT]]>Ok, Nothing against Mustangs at all, but, what do you have to brag about? My brother used to own a 92 5.0 and it was decently fast stock. But,(very big but) what mods do you have done to your car? Exhaust<HOLY SHIT my car has exhaust. Intake<Holy shit my car has intake. Maybe some headers<WOW! Anyway your car is NOT FAST! So STFU. And you might come back with, "Oh and your car is?" But no my car is not fast. Never said it was.

Im pretty much following Carlos Mencia here.....
And to you creating this thread. RETARDED
You calling out HandoEx. RETARDED
Making a fake time slip. RETARDED
Actually arguing in this Dumb ass thread. RETARDED
Add all those up and throw your POS Mustang in there. DEDEDE!!!

EDIT: This thread should definitley be deleted along with you being banned for awhile to teach you a lesson on how to not be so damn stupid.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98432https://fargostreet.com/post/98432Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:19:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:52:48 GMT]]>this is a great thread...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98332https://fargostreet.com/post/98332Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:52:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:13:44 GMT]]>Wow, looks like we have a bunch of chubby chasers in here.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98330https://fargostreet.com/post/98330Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:13:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:07:34 GMT]]>^^^^^^
yes sir! lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98329https://fargostreet.com/post/98329Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:07:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:12:13 GMT]]>All you gotta do is slap the thigh and ride the wave in.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98325https://fargostreet.com/post/98325Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:12:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:03:38 GMT]]>nothign wrong with fat chicks

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98324https://fargostreet.com/post/98324Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:03:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:23:50 GMT]]>TacoSupreme loves fat chicks!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98319https://fargostreet.com/post/98319Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:23:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:04:53 GMT]]>fat chicks > mustangs

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98315https://fargostreet.com/post/98315Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:04:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:00:10 GMT]]>

KidSupreme wrote:
mustang > taurus

By a very small margin.:icon_blackeye:

Might as well be the same car as far as shitty quality goes.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98313https://fargostreet.com/post/98313Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:00:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:50:18 GMT]]>Its the v-t@k-y0

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98312https://fargostreet.com/post/98312Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:50:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:45:04 GMT]]>

50stang wrote:
Your timeslip is still fake... I'd have to be there to see a stock 5.0 with 2.73's run a really low 14 to believe it. I still call BS on that slip.
It's cuz he's a liar and a fake. Boo to MisterCMK.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98311https://fargostreet.com/post/98311Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:45:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:44:36 GMT]]>

50stang wrote:
Your timeslip is still fake... I'd have to be there to see a stock 5.0 with 2.73's run a really low 14 to believe it. I still call BS on that slip.

I call BS on everything here. I have a scan of it if you want. Hell, I'll even bring it to b-dubs tomorrow night. I believe that Brian and Tristan both saw it too. 😄 :icon_rr:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98310https://fargostreet.com/post/98310Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:44:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:42:04 GMT]]>mustang > taurus

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98309https://fargostreet.com/post/98309Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:42:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:41:44 GMT]]>

MisterCMK wrote:
For the record, I do get 27mpg on the highway with my 2.73s.

stir stir stir

Mustang > all

Your timeslip is still fake... I'd have to be there to see a stock 5.0 with 2.73's run a really low 14 to believe it. I still call BS on that slip.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98307https://fargostreet.com/post/98307Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:41:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:40:41 GMT]]>

LankorDie wrote:
That is a 5.0 brand new, now figure in 100k or more + if CMK drives as fast as his mouth moves, I don´t think he gets 28 mpg..
He's pretty lucky that peice of shit even moves:icon_puke_r: :icon_puke_l:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98306https://fargostreet.com/post/98306Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:40:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:39:59 GMT]]>For the record, I do get 27mpg on the highway with my 2.73s.

stir stir stir

Mustang > all

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98305https://fargostreet.com/post/98305Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:39:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:37:48 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
...and teh leader makes an appearance..

this is lame..

And using the oh-so-fresh misspelling of "teh" officially promotes you above me as commander-in-chief of Gaytoria. Time to organize your troops.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98304https://fargostreet.com/post/98304Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:37:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:36:09 GMT]]>

LankorDie wrote:
That is a 5.0 brand new, now figure in 100k or more + if CMK drives as fast as his mouth moves, I don´t think he gets 28 mpg..

Any car... no matter what it is... if you can't keep your foot off the gas pedal the majority of the time the mpg won't be pretty. 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98303https://fargostreet.com/post/98303Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:36:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm calling out HandoEX on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:32:01 GMT]]>

50stang wrote:
The torque is awesome. Stock 5.0 with 2.73's was rated at 20 mpg in town and 28 mpg on the highway I believe... I would have to look at my window sticker again and it is at home right now. It was either 27 or 28 on the highway though. Even with 3.73's it is not that much worse.
That is a 5.0 brand new, now figure in 100k or more + if CMK drives as fast as his mouth moves, I don´t think he gets 28 mpg..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/98302https://fargostreet.com/post/98302Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:32:01 GMT