<![CDATA[Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13]]>We'll be at straightline specialties on May 12 & 13 (I believe it's fri/ sat) Please call for an appointment if at all possible, as we have quite a few already lined up. We can make pulls or do tuning, I just need to know what we're doing and how much time to spend. LS1 edit, Ford chips, and all other programming available. Give me a call or email- I don't check back to forums as often as I should...
andy
(605) 753-1101
andy@dynotuneusa.com

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/6206/dyno-in-fargo-may-12-amp-13RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 03:36:12 GMTWed, 19 Apr 2006 13:44:09 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Tue, 16 May 2006 20:04:54 GMT]]>

Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?

we are talking whp, not bhp...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101953https://fargostreet.com/post/101953Tue, 16 May 2006 20:04:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Tue, 16 May 2006 19:40:09 GMT]]>sorry i read your post wrong...my bad

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101950https://fargostreet.com/post/101950Tue, 16 May 2006 19:40:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:24 GMT]]>

Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?
Ahahaha, ummmm....PWN3D yourself!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101914https://fargostreet.com/post/101914Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:38:55 GMT]]>

Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?

Are you serious?.....240/153 are at the FLYWHEEL, while my 200/137 is at the WHEELS. so there not that bad concidering the loss throgh the drivetrain.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101911https://fargostreet.com/post/101911Tue, 16 May 2006 12:38:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Tue, 16 May 2006 10:58:34 GMT]]>

Spec_R wrote:
That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?

honestly tho, its really only like 17% drivetrain loss which isnt horrible...it seems worse than it really is

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101905https://fargostreet.com/post/101905Tue, 16 May 2006 10:58:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Tue, 16 May 2006 10:17:28 GMT]]>

DrifterExtreme wrote:
My s2000 put down 200 hp and 137 ft/lbs of torque. I was pretty happy with the numbers being it's stock with an intake.

That's horrible...
F20C I4 engine producing 240 hp at 8300 rpm and 153 ft-lb torque at 7500 rpm from factory. Don't you own a S2000? You should've known that.
The reason why people modified their cars is to increase horsepower...if whatever you said is true...you lost 40 hp and 16 ft-lb of torque...?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101904https://fargostreet.com/post/101904Tue, 16 May 2006 10:17:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Mon, 15 May 2006 05:16:53 GMT]]>

camzaro28 wrote:
well torbs was there. he put down less then he was expecting.

understatement of the year...i gata figure out what's going on...put down stock power (113whp)...with 10.8:1 compression, zex 59300 stg. 2 cam, full race header, and ITBs...and that was on the stock ECU, couldnt get crome to work @ all...not a very good day to say the least...I don't get it though, unless the ITBs are really fucking something up, vtec isnt working right, or my motor is just getting weak (which could be the case, it was smoking a bit at the beginning, but by the 3rd run it wasnt smoking anymore)...time to do a comp. test. Anybody got a y8 vtec solonoid I could borrow for like 1/2 hr. just to check and see if mine is working correctly? thanks

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101783https://fargostreet.com/post/101783Mon, 15 May 2006 05:16:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Mon, 15 May 2006 05:14:54 GMT]]>I run SCT software and he has Daiblo

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101782https://fargostreet.com/post/101782Mon, 15 May 2006 05:14:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Mon, 15 May 2006 04:40:59 GMT]]>couldnt andy tune that out for you?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101778https://fargostreet.com/post/101778Mon, 15 May 2006 04:40:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Mon, 15 May 2006 04:23:37 GMT]]>I dynoed Friday but with shitty results...my damn speed limiter is still turned on(im pissed at my tuner) an the truck shut down at 105 mph@4200 rpm's....I did have 340hp at that mark...there should be 30+hp it in on a full run

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101775https://fargostreet.com/post/101775Mon, 15 May 2006 04:23:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sun, 14 May 2006 21:47:09 GMT]]>

DrifterExtreme wrote:
What s2000 have you seen put down more with a cai. That is pretty good for an ap1 s2000(2.0L). So i think it is a pretty strong motor.

I wasn't saying I've seen an S2000 motor put down more with just a CAI, I was simply commenting that it lost 1/6th of its crank power to the wheels. I guess I just expected a little more maybe?

I guess it's roughly 17% loss which isn't horrible but maybe it seems worse than it is...idk

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101723https://fargostreet.com/post/101723Sun, 14 May 2006 21:47:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sun, 14 May 2006 21:44:21 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
like 240 flywheel hp i think isnt it? that actually is a big drop because its through a manual...hmmm

What s2000 have you seen put down more with a cai. That is pretty good for an ap1 s2000(2.0L). So i think it is a pretty strong motor.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101722https://fargostreet.com/post/101722Sun, 14 May 2006 21:44:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sun, 14 May 2006 19:55:52 GMT]]>like 240 flywheel hp i think isnt it? that actually is a big drop because its through a manual...hmmm

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101715https://fargostreet.com/post/101715Sun, 14 May 2006 19:55:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sun, 14 May 2006 19:49:59 GMT]]>

DrifterExtreme wrote:
My s2000 put down 200 hp and 137 ft/lbs of torque. I was pretty happy with the numbers being it's stock with an intake.

Damn that's really good matt. what's the stock rating one one??

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101714https://fargostreet.com/post/101714Sun, 14 May 2006 19:49:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sun, 14 May 2006 18:52:14 GMT]]>My s2000 put down 200 hp and 137 ft/lbs of torque. I was pretty happy with the numbers being it's stock with an intake.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101711https://fargostreet.com/post/101711Sun, 14 May 2006 18:52:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sun, 14 May 2006 13:56:09 GMT]]>once i get around to it. got to figure soemthing out first

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101702https://fargostreet.com/post/101702Sun, 14 May 2006 13:56:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sun, 14 May 2006 06:18:03 GMT]]>290/308 is what I put down. Once I get it tuned for the cam and throw on my CAI I should get atleast 310 hp out of it.

Brian are you putting the dyno videos on the net?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101696https://fargostreet.com/post/101696Sun, 14 May 2006 06:18:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sat, 13 May 2006 22:19:56 GMT]]>well torbs was there. he put down less then he was expecting. i think 4 cars have went the last 5 hours, pretty slow going

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101655https://fargostreet.com/post/101655Sat, 13 May 2006 22:19:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Sat, 13 May 2006 18:33:44 GMT]]>any word on some numbers from you guys

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101640https://fargostreet.com/post/101640Sat, 13 May 2006 18:33:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Fri, 12 May 2006 01:25:49 GMT]]>I am on saturday. showin up at around noon...car is supposed to get tuned @ around 1

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101471https://fargostreet.com/post/101471Fri, 12 May 2006 01:25:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Thu, 11 May 2006 14:50:57 GMT]]>Who is going to be dynoing this Fri and Sat? I think Raider is, who else?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/101414https://fargostreet.com/post/101414Thu, 11 May 2006 14:50:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:51:04 GMT]]>i will call tomarrow about ether my s2000 or my crx to get tuned.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/99470https://fargostreet.com/post/99470Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:51:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dyno in Fargo May 12 &amp; 13 on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:32:21 GMT]]>pm'd about the honduh

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/99469https://fargostreet.com/post/99469Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:32:21 GMT