<![CDATA[Nate's old DSM in turbo mag?]]>Sure looks like it to me.....

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/6303/nate-s-old-dsm-in-turbo-magRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 03:06:00 GMTSat, 29 Apr 2006 15:12:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:42:02 GMT]]>my DSM went on to blow up the motor, tranny, and turbo....im sure the kid was just a ricer

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100423https://fargostreet.com/post/100423Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:42:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:12:53 GMT]]>

integra_gsr98 wrote:
What was Troy's problem then? Haha!

O.F. (Operator Failure)👽

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100418https://fargostreet.com/post/100418Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:12:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:52:11 GMT]]>What was Troy's problem then? Haha!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100414https://fargostreet.com/post/100414Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:52:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:20:49 GMT]]>

aliengotpsi wrote:
well 510 hp = about 600 at crank.. not 700 but with nos it could be..

Shiiit...it had more than 510. With C16 I made 510 with the clutch slipping horribly. I am guessing probably around 550 as it was when I ran the 10.8.

Dave, I think you meant to put DSM tranny parts...Engines are the only good thing in the cars!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100406https://fargostreet.com/post/100406Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:20:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:57:56 GMT]]>lol lol lol lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100404https://fargostreet.com/post/100404Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:57:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:57:36 GMT]]>lol lol lol lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100403https://fargostreet.com/post/100403Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:57:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:44:12 GMT]]>

aliengotpsi wrote:
well 510 hp = about 600 at crank.. not 700 but with nos it could be a bunch of DSM bottom end parts scattered all over the ground..

I completed the quote that Kevin began.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100391https://fargostreet.com/post/100391Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:44:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:20:34 GMT]]>well 510 hp = about 600 at crank.. not 700 but with nos it could be..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100385https://fargostreet.com/post/100385Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:20:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:14:54 GMT]]>Nate we are cool now, we have both been in magazines 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100372https://fargostreet.com/post/100372Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:14:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:46:42 GMT]]>"pushing out roughly 700HP"......... yeah right. I love it when people claim shit like that.

On a better note, good job Nate. Maybe you should build my next car so it can be in a magazine!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100371https://fargostreet.com/post/100371Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:46:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:30:16 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
thats pimp! i grew up looking up to that car, the red one and the white one...

Me too! 😉

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100370https://fargostreet.com/post/100370Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:30:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:03:04 GMT]]>thats pimp! i grew up looking up to that car, the red one and the white one...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100359https://fargostreet.com/post/100359Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:03:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:34:48 GMT]]>Sweet! Short post FTW!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100353https://fargostreet.com/post/100353Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:34:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:34:42 GMT]]>That's pretty fricken cool :icon_thumleft:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100352https://fargostreet.com/post/100352Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:34:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:23:45 GMT]]>That's my ole beater! He calls me once in awhile to tell me how good it still runs and how he takes people for rides and they get out looking like this:eek:

Nice that he put thanks to me in there instead of just claiming it as his, heh.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100351https://fargostreet.com/post/100351Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:23:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:46:59 GMT]]>

aliengotpsi wrote:
sounds like all of nates ol parts... just looks too clean... different color wheels. that would be ardens, tufted, kovash's ol car too then
Those look silver to me. It may be just how the pic looks to you.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100350https://fargostreet.com/post/100350Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:46:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:43:50 GMT]]>sounds like all of nates ol parts... just looks too clean... different color wheels. that would be ardens, tufted, kovash's ol car too then

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100349https://fargostreet.com/post/100349Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:43:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:39:17 GMT]]>"Special thanks to Nate." at the end pretty much confirms it. Burgess is a rockstar.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100348https://fargostreet.com/post/100348Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:39:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Nate's old DSM in turbo mag? on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:39:06 GMT]]>nate had silver wheels.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/100347https://fargostreet.com/post/100347Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:39:06 GMT