<![CDATA[So who actually voted today?]]>I was number 102 at my polling place this morning.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/716/so-who-actually-voted-todayRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:44:00 GMTTue, 02 Nov 2004 14:03:30 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:56:36 GMT]]>correction, if Bush takes OH and NM he wins, if he takes OH and Alaska, its a tie...I believe

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11352https://fargostreet.com/post/11352Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:56:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:54:36 GMT]]>even if bush wins Ohio, there is a small chance of Kerry winning. Ohio is only 20 EV's, that would put bush at 266 and Kerry at 274 if the others went Kerry. Now if NM goes Bush as well, then its a tie...and the house gets to choose a President and the Senate gets to chose VP....theoretically we could see Bush as Pres and Kerry or Edwards as VP.... That would be interesting.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11351https://fargostreet.com/post/11351Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:54:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:52:00 GMT]]>

fallguy wrote:
Looks like you'll have to start polishing up on your "Hillary for President" signs Chuck.

I think Bush has this one...lots o' red on that map. 🙂
Hmm...I think if Hillary wanted it, this would have been her best shot at getting it. I'm not entirely sure i'd vote for her in 2008, not that she is/isn't qualified, I'd just want to see who she is running against first. As for Jeb, I HIGHLY doubt he'll run in '08....or ever for that matter.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11350https://fargostreet.com/post/11350Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:52:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:48:31 GMT]]>

fallguy wrote:
I think Bush has this one...lots o' red on that map. 🙂

Its like a giant Risk game. I think bush has more cannon men.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11349https://fargostreet.com/post/11349Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:48:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:47:21 GMT]]>86% of votes in Ohio. 147,879 is the vote count diffrence, we still might be ok..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11348https://fargostreet.com/post/11348Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:47:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:46:55 GMT]]>Jeb will defeat Hillary in 08.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11347https://fargostreet.com/post/11347Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:46:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:46:18 GMT]]>Looks like you'll have to start polishing up on your "Hillary for President" signs Chuck.

I think Bush has this one...lots o' red on that map. 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11346https://fargostreet.com/post/11346Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:46:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:43:05 GMT]]>But I'm not conceding defeat quite yet

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11345https://fargostreet.com/post/11345Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:43:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:42:46 GMT]]>did you think fox would project anything other than that? LOL. I will be the first Dem to say, it looks like Bush has this one.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11344https://fargostreet.com/post/11344Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:42:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:42:28 GMT]]>You win kirk...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11343https://fargostreet.com/post/11343Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:42:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:41:43 GMT]]>FOX news projects Bush wins Ohio

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11342https://fargostreet.com/post/11342Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:41:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:38:34 GMT]]>I'm glad your watching. KvlyTV11 took over KxjbTv4 this year and we combined the two stations to work together. It's crazy and alot more work then before but we got a larger budget and new digital toys. Both stations will be HD by 2006.

I like how we are using the resources of two stations to befit both.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11340https://fargostreet.com/post/11340Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:38:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:36:29 GMT]]>There are still 103 Electorals up for grabs, more than enough for a win

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11339https://fargostreet.com/post/11339Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:36:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:36:00 GMT]]>Hanging chads are the dingle berrys of the election.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11338https://fargostreet.com/post/11338Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:36:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:35:56 GMT]]>Lank whats up with this KVLY, KXJB combo?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11337https://fargostreet.com/post/11337Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:35:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:34:09 GMT]]>thats what I'm thinking too. the one thing that I KNOW will be contested is the voting machines....especially those that leave no paper trail (Read Florida, PA, Ohio, etc...) I'm not saying I condone this, but they were never proven to be over 90% accurate during their testing, so I don't see how they can be used to decide an election.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11334https://fargostreet.com/post/11334Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:34:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:33:09 GMT]]>Look good boys, Looking real good...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11333https://fargostreet.com/post/11333Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:33:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:32:04 GMT]]>Well it would be ok for Bush to stew in his own shit/deficit. Ohio will decide the hole race in a couple of little while. If kerry doesnt get it, his goose is cooked.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11332https://fargostreet.com/post/11332Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:32:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:30:39 GMT]]>there is still the possibility that some states may be splitting their electoral colleges, I heard mention of colorado amongst other places. But I agree, right now its not looking good for Kerry. I can live with that, but as they say, it's not over til its over.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11330https://fargostreet.com/post/11330Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:30:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:28:02 GMT]]>Kerry lost it is so over...

Bush just got flordia

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11329https://fargostreet.com/post/11329Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:28:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:25:53 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
I just find it hard to believe that any state is at an advantage losing a senior member. I honestly don't know enough about Daschle to form an opinion one way or the other. I didn't mean it to sound like there is nothing wrong w/ him, I just don't know enough about him.

He is the Dem. Minority leader I believe.

Daschle is such a partisian that I can't believe the shit that comes out of his mouth. But besides that, I can't think of a single time I've heard him when I actually agreed with what he said (when he was talking about bills/laws, etc). He is way far left, I don't know how he ever got elected in SD in the first place. Maybe he wasn't that far left when he originally got elected, I dunno.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11328https://fargostreet.com/post/11328Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:25:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:17:36 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
Yep, Janklow... governor I believe? He was drunk and got in a car accident, not sure if someone got killed tho.
Former Governor...yes, the man on the motorcycle was killed. Randolph Scott I think was his name

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11327https://fargostreet.com/post/11327Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:17:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:16:30 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
Yep, Janklow... governor I believe? He was drunk and got in a car accident, not sure if someone got killed tho.
Yep Janklow killed a young man on a motor bike.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11326https://fargostreet.com/post/11326Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:16:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So who actually voted today? on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:16:00 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
I didn't insinuate that you did. 😛 I just said that you got your work cut out for you... lots of votes to sway. 🙂

DaveH<--- Falls on the floor laughing in disbelief

:eek:
I just find it hard to believe that any state is at an advantage losing a senior member. I honestly don't know enough about Daschle to form an opinion one way or the other. I didn't mean it to sound like there is nothing wrong w/ him, I just don't know enough about him.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11325https://fargostreet.com/post/11325Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:16:00 GMT