<![CDATA[Interesting Map]]>I'm surprised Kerry got a few counties in ND... not a single county in Utah, Oklahoma, or Nebraska.

Looks like Bush didn't get a single county in one of the Northeastern States (Conneticut or something, I'm too lazy to look up which state that was).legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/738/interesting-mapRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 10:42:55 GMTThu, 04 Nov 2004 18:49:39 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:36:43 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
Sweet! think we can get some slaves again? 😄 or wait... ND wasn't in the slave state area. 😞

you need to move to the south with them rednecks for that Dave

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/12828https://fargostreet.com/post/12828Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:36:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:55:08 GMT]]>Sweet! think we can get some slaves again? 😄 or wait... ND wasn't in the slave state area. 😞

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/12827https://fargostreet.com/post/12827Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:55:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:21:19 GMT]]>

DaveH wrote:
I'm surprised Kerry got a few counties in ND... not a single county in Utah, Oklahoma, or Nebraska.

Looks like Bush didn't get a single county in one of the Northeastern States (Conneticut or something, I'm too lazy to look up which state that was).legacy image

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/12823https://fargostreet.com/post/12823Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:21:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 23:40:01 GMT]]>Weird... I guess ppl get their opinions...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11965https://fargostreet.com/post/11965Fri, 05 Nov 2004 23:40:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:58:33 GMT]]>

tjamz wrote:
DC was 90% Kerry, 10% Bush
I was reading a article from the east coast, where they were interviewing people on the street (I think it was in NY City). The people they interviewed were in disbelieve that there were people who would even consider voting for Bush. They basically came out and said that they had superior intelect coming from the big city, and that all the rural (midwest) folk were spoofed by Bush into voting for him. I got a chuckle out of that.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11943https://fargostreet.com/post/11943Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:58:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:33:41 GMT]]>DC was 90% Kerry, 10% Bush

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11936https://fargostreet.com/post/11936Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:33:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:31:57 GMT]]>You do realize that the British company that standardizes and grades the IQ tests released their "smartest states" results a year ago and the top 16 all voted for Kerry....and not one state was below #25 that voted for Kerry.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11935https://fargostreet.com/post/11935Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:31:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:57:12 GMT]]>I figured He Had IOWA but it was also at the point where he already won so i mean it only makes him look better I guess.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11922https://fargostreet.com/post/11922Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:57:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:48:44 GMT]]>They just finished counting all the ballots... GWB got Iowa also (as far as electoral votes go). The electoral college map looks pretty similar.

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11919https://fargostreet.com/post/11919Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:48:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:19:37 GMT]]>Ya no kidding; The east and west coast is where Kerry took it; but there's a lot of population there as well. It's like Bush focused on campaigning the Middle of the US while Kerry took the east and west coast.. Guess you could say Bush got sandwiched. Except for the South East. (Fla.) but you get the idea...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11905https://fargostreet.com/post/11905Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:19:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:15:23 GMT]]>Damn alot of red on there.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11684https://fargostreet.com/post/11684Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:15:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:06:27 GMT]]>well he had all of alaska cause i dont think they have any county's... if i remember right

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11682https://fargostreet.com/post/11682Thu, 04 Nov 2004 19:06:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:56:55 GMT]]>damn looks like bush owned....90% of the population in Washington voted for kerry!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11681https://fargostreet.com/post/11681Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:56:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Map on Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:55:02 GMT]]>Massachussetts (go figure) was all Kerry. The map makes it look like Alaska was all Bush and Hawaii was all Kerry (but you can't really tell with all the islands.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/11680https://fargostreet.com/post/11680Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:55:02 GMT