Some of this might be stated already so sorry if im echoing people!!

There are some serious costs involved in playing sports on any sort of competitive level. By being a part of the school sponsored sports (at least in my HS) you didn't have to pay for football pads, wrestling gear, basketball jerseys, etc... as they were paid for by sports boosters and ticket/concession sales. Aside from that even, there is an academic reason for having sports in that you have to maintain a certain gradepoint and/or social (by that I mean not smarting off to the teachers, etc..) standing within your classes to be eligible to play each week which helps push young athletes towards maintaining their academic standards (please, lets not get into the athletes get pushed through the system argument...it does happen sometimes, no doubt, but I'd say more exception than rule).

I find it funny that you think PE should be dropped from curriculum. Personally, I don't think there is enough of it. Too many kids don't do anything besides play video games, watch tv, download porn, etc... as it is. For many kids this is the only exercise they will get in a day (unfortunately).

Like most topics, I could argue forever on this, but I think you get my point.

99slowGSX wrote:
Yeah, I can get you a report if you really would like it. City expenses and School Expenses also would be classified in different categories. LIke I said before the bigger sports pay for themselves and the smaller ones do not. You may call it a debate, but you have to be so far in Left field to believe that our society should not have any extra activites because it costs money. Well therfore we should not have parks, stadiums, public assistance, etc......because they all cost money and do not benefit everyone.
No, no i believe you, i was just curious please don't send me a copy.

Read my posts, I think activities are great and should be funded, but not if they take it out of the schools budget. I'm 100% with you on activities being good, i would never debate that.

97 jeep: Those liability waivers are not even close to air tight. These days (post mcdonalds coffee incident) there is no exemption from liability. Unfortunate but true.

The MHS football stadium was paid for by an indivual not the city or tax money. At least i think a majority off it was. It probably happens elsewere also. And in the area the hockey games and team bring in lots of $$$. You see people all over the place with spuds hockey shirt, coats, ect. and same with other schools

I do agree on some of this. I think high school sports are not only a thing that benifits the players but the students as well. It gives them pride in thier school. But when certain teams are leaving the area(with 300 miles) multiple times in the year i think that is a waste.

I loved playing sports for my highschool, it was great, but now that I am about a year from an education degree and i have seen the other side I have had to re-evaluate. I do believe that schools, in town and across the nation, put to much into sports for what the students get out of them. And i think they are what really matter.

MethodlesS wrote:
Does it cover the dramatic increase in Liability insurance the city has to pay? does it cover the cost of purchasing and maintaining the facilities? I'm not being sarcastic or anything, i really want to know? Does your mom have this information? I think the information from your mom is the yearly fees the city has to pay (minus insurance costs), not the overall picture.

99% of schools having sports doesn't make it worth it, just means that 99% of schools found a way to cut the budget somewhere else to afford it.

P.S. This isn't called drama its called debate. <----Get it, its a funny refernce to some of the earlier post

Yeah, I can get you a report if you really would like it. City expenses and School Expenses also would be classified in different categories. LIke I said before the bigger sports pay for themselves and the smaller ones do not. You may call it a debate, but you have to be so far in Left field to believe that our society should not have any extra activites because it costs money. Well therfore we should not have parks, stadiums, public assistance, etc......because they all cost money and do not benefit everyone.

99slowGSX wrote:
Well my research comes straight from the Moorhead Activites Office. My mom works there and has all of the information. So since the person who wrote the letter was comparing Fargo and not the whole United States, I would assume it would be close to Moorhead. With student activity fees that each player/participant is required to pay, ticket sales, concessions, playoff ticket sales they do cover the biggest sports in the school. You can think what you want and claim I do not have reliable sources, but I know what I am talking about. So all in all it is not the tax payers dollars that are supporting the sports/activities after school and you can not deny that. Think what you want and cause drama, if it wasnt worth the money then why does 99% of the United States Schools have them. Just think about it.
Does it cover the dramatic increase in Liability insurance the city has to pay? does it cover the cost of purchasing and maintaining the facilities? I'm not being sarcastic or anything, i really want to know? Does your mom have this information? I think the information from your mom is the yearly fees the city has to pay (minus insurance costs), not the overall picture.

99% of schools having sports doesn't make it worth it, just means that 99% of schools found a way to cut the budget somewhere else to afford it.

P.S. This isn't called drama its called debate. <----Get it, its a funny refernce to some of the earlier post

99slowGSX wrote:
Well my research comes straight from the Moorhead Activites Office. My mom works there and has all of the information. So since the person who wrote the letter was comparing Fargo and not the whole United States, I would assume it would be close to Moorhead. With student activity fees that each player/participant is required to pay, ticket sales, concessions, playoff ticket sales they do cover the biggest sports in the school. You can think what you want and claim I do not have reliable sources, but I know what I am talking about. So all in all it is not only the tax payers dollars that are supporting the sports/activities after school and you can not deny that. Think what you want and cause drama, if it wasnt worth the money then why does 99% of the United States Schools have them. Just think about it.

Agree:icon_salut:

MethodlesS wrote:
Brian, i don't do drugs.

Perhaps you need to research a term: Credible Information. this term implies that you can't just think of an idea (say that sports sales compensate for the cost of the sport) and make it fact. On the other hand i can say: 96% of public schools in the US do not even come close to paying 50% of the activity cost to the school with ticket sales/concessions/fundrasing/alumni and have it be fact, because it was published after a Government survey of all public schools in the US was completed and compiled.

I will agree with you on the drama debate stuff though do it on your own time

Hando:
Gym class will not cure obesity, i would suggest that the best cure would be a knife and a wet/dry vacuum, otherwise i would suggest that the parents shape up, then force their kids to.
I believe you are now speaking from personal history. and i will agree that the current state of classrooms, these days, is rather poor. I will however say that in some schools they have begun to force higher levels of comprehension (similar to the school system of Japan) and have found much better results in "team building/social application" etc. I should reiterate that i do not think the US school system is up to par right now, i only argue that it could be done.

Schools were not meant to make us more mature, by definition they are meant to educate us.
I do agree that out of class activities do encourage personal growth, but I do not believe they should be funded out of the schools budget.

Well my research comes straight from the Moorhead Activites Office. My mom works there and has all of the information. So since the person who wrote the letter was comparing Fargo and not the whole United States, I would assume it would be close to Moorhead. With student activity fees that each player/participant is required to pay, ticket sales, concessions, playoff ticket sales they do cover the biggest sports in the school. You can think what you want and claim I do not have reliable sources, but I know what I am talking about. So all in all it is not only the tax payers dollars that are supporting the sports/activities after school and you can not deny that. Think what you want and cause drama, if it wasnt worth the money then why does 99% of the United States Schools have them. Just think about it.

99slowGSX wrote:
The real question is "why does she just target sports?" and not other activities after school......

because she is partial, as is everyone, plus > aliengotpsi wrote:

im guessing this person is a poor old fat bitch.!!!who hasn't gotten laid since the amputation....

weshole wrote:
I think all the said classes/sports/electives should stay in the school system and should be an option for all who attend. There needs to be more $$ put forth for these very things. Noone here is in the wrong. The people funding us needs to get its priorities straight and stop cutting back on the funds for the schools.

Very well said.

I have read about studies where certain cities budget for the schools, and then budget for City sponsored activities ie: everything from football to flute playing;
and have found that more funding becomes available for both when people have a better idea of where their money is going.

Perhaps you need to research a term: Credible Information. this term implies that you can't just think of an idea (say that sports sales compensate for the cost of the sport) and make it fact. On the other hand i can say: 96% of public schools in the US do not even come close to paying 50% of the activity cost to the school with ticket sales/concessions/fundrasing/alumni and have it be fact, because it was published after a Government survey of all public schools in the US was completed and compiled.

I will agree with you on the drama debate stuff though do it on your own time

Hando:
Gym class will not cure obesity, i would suggest that the best cure would be a knife and a wet/dry vacuum, otherwise i would suggest that the parents shape up, then force their kids to.
I believe you are now speaking from personal history. and i will agree that the current state of classrooms, these days, is rather poor. I will however say that in some schools they have begun to force higher levels of comprehension (similar to the school system of Japan) and have found much better results in "team building/social application" etc. I should reiterate that i do not think the US school system is up to par right now, i only argue that it could be done.

Schools were not meant to make us more mature, by definition they are meant to educate us.
I do agree that out of class activities encourage personal growth, but I do not believe they should be funded out of the schools budget.

02AccordEXV6 wrote:
Band Geek!!
Haha, I was in choir (and football, basketball and baseball)

MethodlesS wrote:

1. obesity is not going to be cured by school sports.
   2)You can learn all of these things in those classes if taught well and you are held to a high level of learning plus if you read my post, i say do these thing on your own time and dollar, just not on schools tab
   3)Again no; if you want to learn to play a instrument, sing, speak, or just hang out with fat sexually frustrated men and women, do it on your own

1. gym class
2. no, you really can't
3. glad it worked for you

But really, is our educational system set up to teach information or to encourage growth? In my opinion, the fundamental basis behind our school systems is to help students grow into mature adults, which is encouraged by out of class activities like debate or football.

MethodlesS wrote:
Highschool sports <u>are</u> a waste of money that should have been spent on things that further the education of students. I love sports, I played HS sports, but I don't think a schoolboard should ever have to decide between <u>New Curriculum material or away games/sports equipment</u>. School is for educating minds not bodies.

If you want to play sports you should do so on your own time and your own dollar.

I don't even think gym should be a class.

Well now maybe you need to get a clue and lay off the drugs........first off gym class is there to promote fitness, nutritition, and staying in shape. They offer this from 1st grade on, so kids do not become fat asses, even though they are. Sports in general really do not cost that much of the schools money considering that football, hockey, baseketball, etc have a thing called TICKET SALES, CONCESSIONS, MERCHANDISE for home games. This thing called revenue offsets the costs and creates less expenses to play sports. Also, to make things fair. They should cancel debate, drama, science bowl and any other extra ciricular activity. I wonder what after school activities promote, Handoex already said in the earlier post. So in retrospect it also keeps kids out of trouble for the most part. Hopefully this paragraph can CLUE you in a little bit........

HandoEX wrote:
Do you agree that schools should cut funding for speech teams, choir, band, debate, and other non-classroom activities?

Band Geek!!

HandoEX wrote:
Right, because there isn't a severe obesity problem in this country already:icon_scratch:

If you played sports, you probably learned many things you can't learn in a math or history class....discipline, determination, teamwork. Learning is not limited only to curriculum. Do you agree that schools should cut funding for speech teams, choir, band, debate, and other non-classroom activities?

1. obesity is not going to be cured by school sports.
   2)You can learn all of these things in those classes if taught well and you are held to a high level of learning plus if you read my post, i say do these thing on your own time and dollar, just not on schools tab
   3)Again no; if you want to learn to play a instrument, sing, speak, or just hang out with fat sexually frustrated men and women, do it on your own

MethodlesS wrote:
Highschool sports <u>are</u> a waste of money that should have been spent on things that further the education of students. I love sports, I played HS sports, but I don't think a schoolboard should ever have to decide between <u>New Curriculum material or away games/sports equipment</u>. School is for educating minds not bodies.

If you want to play sports you should do so on your own time and your own dollar.

I don't even think gym should be a class.
Right, because there isn't a severe obesity problem in this country already:icon_scratch:

If you played sports, you probably learned many things you can't learn in a math or history class....discipline, determination, teamwork. Learning is not limited only to curriculum. Do you agree that schools should cut funding for speech teams, choir, band, debate, and other non-classroom activities?

99slowGSX wrote:
This person needs to get a clue......

I was just wondering what it was that they needed to be clued in on??

If you want to play sports you should do so on your own time and your own dollar.

I don't even think gym should be a class.