<![CDATA[Update on my old Spyder:]]>http://www.mnsportcompacts.net/forum/showthread.php?p=524659#post524659

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/7770/update-on-my-old-spyderRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 06:27:50 GMTThu, 21 Sep 2006 08:03:21 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:42:10 GMT]]>Well, those are his upcoming mods so hopefully thats the upcoming boost too.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118524https://fargostreet.com/post/118524Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:42:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:24:45 GMT]]>

nd_dsm wrote:
1997 Eclipse GS-T Spyder, 30-35psi
-Built, 6-bolt, 2.4L 4G64(T)
-MAP stage-4 head

I wonder if thats how much boost they were running, or if that is what they are GOING to run. Its in his sig.

I hope he wasn't running 30-35psi on pump gas and that same tune!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118515https://fargostreet.com/post/118515Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:24:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:32:39 GMT]]>1997 Eclipse GS-T Spyder, 30-35psi
-Built, 6-bolt, 2.4L 4G64(T)
-MAP stage-4 head

I wonder if thats how much boost they were running, or if that is what they are GOING to run. Its in his sig.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118509https://fargostreet.com/post/118509Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:32:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:59:29 GMT]]>I want a black on black 99 GSX, with black rims w/ polished lip.

Oh wait, it would break.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118492https://fargostreet.com/post/118492Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:59:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:59:51 GMT]]>

treimche wrote:
6 bolt 4g64 also came in older galants. That motor is still a POS and not worth the time/effort. Glad to see you don't have to deal w/ fixing that shit Jim!
I had an 89 galant, it had a single cam 4g63 in it if I remember correctly.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118480https://fargostreet.com/post/118480Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:59:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:53:48 GMT]]>6 bolt 4g64 also came in older galants. That motor is still a POS and not worth the time/effort. Glad to see you don't have to deal w/ fixing that shit Jim!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118468https://fargostreet.com/post/118468Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:53:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:11:30 GMT]]>

97slowgsx wrote:
and in the old mitsu trucks.

the mighty max y0...and the way you tell if they have a 6 bolt 4g64 in them is if their MAS looks like one off of a 2g

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118464https://fargostreet.com/post/118464Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:11:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:41:00 GMT]]>and in the old mitsu trucks.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118450https://fargostreet.com/post/118450Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:41:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:05:09 GMT]]>Uhm the 4g64 6bolt came in Hyundais.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118445https://fargostreet.com/post/118445Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:05:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:51:54 GMT]]>read one of the last comments on that thread. it said something along the lines of " fastest fwd stock turbo is in the 10's" ?
is that possible? just asking.
but IIRC dont the stock turbos max out somewhere around 400? and then FWD to pull it into the tens, dont seem logical.
like i said, just asking.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118441https://fargostreet.com/post/118441Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:51:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:35:27 GMT]]>

wannabe wrote:
4g64 is a 2.4 single cam motor out of a syder GS FYI. Tons or torque for a 4 cyl, but I think traction will still be a HUGE issue in making that thing run 11's since he's keeping it front wheel. That thing will need some sweet ass suspension.and a nice traction bar, along with massive slicks. but, that would be one hell of a highway puller!
ok harry.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118435https://fargostreet.com/post/118435Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:35:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:18:18 GMT]]>what did the 6 bolt 4g64s come in? i never heard of them

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118434https://fargostreet.com/post/118434Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:18:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:12:51 GMT]]>He said its a 6 bolt version. They made a few of those as well.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118432https://fargostreet.com/post/118432Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:12:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:56:33 GMT]]>Except that its a 7 Bolt and if you make any real power, it will crank walk...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118429https://fargostreet.com/post/118429Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:56:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:37:04 GMT]]>most people dont know, just throwing out some general information.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118424https://fargostreet.com/post/118424Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:37:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:33:23 GMT]]>Joel, who are you telling that to? I think all of us that have posted know what it is.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118420https://fargostreet.com/post/118420Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:33:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:30:24 GMT]]>4g64 is a 2.4 single cam motor out of a syder GS FYI. Tons or torque for a 4 cyl, but I think traction will still be a HUGE issue in making that thing run 11's since he's keeping it front wheel. That thing will need some sweet ass suspension.and a nice traction bar, along with massive slicks. but, that would be one hell of a highway puller!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118417https://fargostreet.com/post/118417Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:30:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:24:46 GMT]]>They are putting a 4G64 in it... and i guess they are porting the head too?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118411https://fargostreet.com/post/118411Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:24:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:23:34 GMT]]>Well, considering the wastegate vacuum line wasn't attached probably allowed them to run A TON of boost on a highway pull. Shit sucks, and I'm not too sure how MAP is going to build their car...haha.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118410https://fargostreet.com/post/118410Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:23:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:20:20 GMT]]>I dont know about bad luck; they must have been running it lean or else boosting like 30+ psi boost on pump gas...

That motor shoudln't have blown up...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118409https://fargostreet.com/post/118409Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:20:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:49:08 GMT]]>I saw that and I wasn't for sure if it was yours or not!! Thats dumb luck there

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118404https://fargostreet.com/post/118404Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:49:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:33:31 GMT]]>that car has just had bad luck hasnt it

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118392https://fargostreet.com/post/118392Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:33:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Update on my old Spyder: on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:36:17 GMT]]>At least you don't have to fix it this time.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/118380https://fargostreet.com/post/118380Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:36:17 GMT