<![CDATA[who was it this morning?]]>Ok was it someone from here that was on Main Ave this morning....it was a red import maybe a cavalier that has red apc stickers in back window and 1/4 window...sorry didnt see windows were icy...we had some fun this morning...the old Procharger in the truck did its job

Kelly

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/802/who-was-it-this-morningRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:44:31 GMTWed, 17 Nov 2004 13:29:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:08:55 GMT]]>lol i might know who that is.. hes got fancy gauges but no turbo. its like a mid 15 sec car.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14020https://fargostreet.com/post/14020Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:08:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:23:39 GMT]]>i didnt here it if it was but his fart can was load as hell and when Im under full boost I dont hear anything either...Im sure it wasnt because I had 3+ truck lengths on him before i hit 70

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14006https://fargostreet.com/post/14006Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:23:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:52:03 GMT]]>was it turbo?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13999https://fargostreet.com/post/13999Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:52:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:47:07 GMT]]>

amicheze wrote:
like one of the newer ones? did you notice any decals on it? big fart can?

The MX6 had a fart can and some red apc or aem stickers on windows...it was a manual...the year Im not sure but like a early 90's

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13996https://fargostreet.com/post/13996Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:47:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:08:42 GMT]]>

Raider wrote:
ok the little red car wanted to rumble again this morning...its a Mazda Mx6...he didnt have a chance..does anyone know who this is?

like one of the newer ones? did you notice any decals on it? big fart can?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13912https://fargostreet.com/post/13912Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:08:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:22:47 GMT]]>

Raider wrote:
ok the little red car wanted to rumble again this morning...its a Mazda Mx6...he didnt have a chance..does anyone know who this is?
Is there anyone going to be out tonight? Ive seen him dont know him

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13900https://fargostreet.com/post/13900Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:22:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:30:19 GMT]]>ok the little red car wanted to rumble again this morning...its a Mazda Mx6...he didnt have a chance..does anyone know who this is?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13831https://fargostreet.com/post/13831Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:30:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:59:56 GMT]]>And they'll all get owned by a little V6 Syclone. lol

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13273https://fargostreet.com/post/13273Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:59:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:59:12 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
8.3 V10 Talk about horse

No HP, all torque.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13272https://fargostreet.com/post/13272Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:59:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:27:14 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
Excursions are the shit they are meant for 8 people but u can get 25 in the dam thing

okay?

And I'm so jealous I can't get 25 people in my explorer!

I've got nothing against excursions, aside from the fact they're about 3" short of being a damned school bus.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13265https://fargostreet.com/post/13265Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:27:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:02:39 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
:thumbup!!!1!!!!1111one:
Excursions are the shit they are meant for 8 people but u can get 25 in the dam thing

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13260https://fargostreet.com/post/13260Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:02:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:00:50 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
so Its still bad ass and can go more places then ur car!

:thumbup!!!1!!!!1111one:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13258https://fargostreet.com/post/13258Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:00:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:46:45 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
and when it weighs 8000 lbs.....
so Its still bad ass and can go more places then ur car!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13255https://fargostreet.com/post/13255Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:46:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:44:47 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
My dads got a 2002 Excursion with 310 to the wheels with a V10

and when it weighs 8000 lbs.....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13254https://fargostreet.com/post/13254Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:44:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:35:18 GMT]]>whats wrong with ford?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13251https://fargostreet.com/post/13251Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:35:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:34:34 GMT]]>stock rams are not supercharged...harleys and lightnings are the only stock supercharged truck i can think of and they are both fords

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13250https://fargostreet.com/post/13250Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:34:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:34:01 GMT]]>and next year there will be a super charged 2000 harley truck in fargo

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13249https://fargostreet.com/post/13249Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:34:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:33:32 GMT]]>

Raider wrote:
I havent seen any S/C trucks in town besides mine..but maybe there is
the 2001 harley trucks are super charged so are the lightnings

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13248https://fargostreet.com/post/13248Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:33:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:32:27 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
Moded then hows that?

I havent seen any S/C trucks in town besides mine..but maybe there is

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13247https://fargostreet.com/post/13247Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:32:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:32:24 GMT]]>My dads got a 2002 Excursion with 310 to the wheels with a V10

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13246https://fargostreet.com/post/13246Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:32:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:31:48 GMT]]>

Raider wrote:
yes u are correct...I was thinking of older years

they can have 3.7 v6, 4.7 v8 or 5.7 hemi or 8.3 v10
8.3 V10 Talk about horse

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13245https://fargostreet.com/post/13245Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:31:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:31:02 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
isnt the hemi a 5.7?

yes u are correct...I was thinking of older years

they can have 3.7 v6, 4.7 v8 or 5.7 hemi or 8.3 v10

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13244https://fargostreet.com/post/13244Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:31:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:30:49 GMT]]>

PSiedTSi wrote:
umm no they arent supercharged
Moded then hows that?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13243https://fargostreet.com/post/13243Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:30:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to who was it this morning? on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:26:42 GMT]]>umm no they arent supercharged

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/13241https://fargostreet.com/post/13241Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:26:42 GMT