<![CDATA['05 Mustang GT dyno]]>Brand new, with window stickers from local dealer. This is the new 3v 4.6L. Car was a 5 speed with 68 miles on it. Judging by the A/F and conservative timing in PCM, there will be room for another 15-25 in programming when the PCM is cracked. From a week or two ago... I just thought the site needed some performance related threads. Thanks

_05GTdyno copy.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/865/05-mustang-gt-dynoRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 08:46:54 GMTMon, 29 Nov 2004 19:55:09 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:33:19 GMT]]>

dubbsy wrote:
Dug up one guy saying 23HP from SCT's tune....
Fuck that is so sexy!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14814https://fargostreet.com/post/14814Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:33:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:32:42 GMT]]>^That looks pretty badass^

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14813https://fargostreet.com/post/14813Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:32:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:30:23 GMT]]>Dug up one guy saying 23HP from SCT's tune....

gfgstangs1.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14812https://fargostreet.com/post/14812Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:30:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:17:02 GMT]]>

amicheze wrote:
i think the new mustangs look mean as hell. the gt's anyway..
I my self perfer the saleen model mustang...can anyone get specs on the circut mustang?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14805https://fargostreet.com/post/14805Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:17:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:53:17 GMT]]>

when the PCM is cracked? (EEC dammit!)

been there, done that.

I guess I forgot superchips had it already- I use diablo revolution software and we don't have it yet. Shouldn't be too long...
I apologize for the lack of info.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14800https://fargostreet.com/post/14800Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:53:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:36:34 GMT]]>Hmm the mustang should weild better numbers then that once they can tune it... with a simple diablo predator tuner with my SVT focus it weilds another 15whp and 15wtq without any mods...

Some of the body kits for the car make it look much better... I personally like the Steeda kit.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14798https://fargostreet.com/post/14798Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:36:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:34:58 GMT]]>

amicheze wrote:
i think the new mustangs look mean as hell. the gt's anyway..
2nd that.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14797https://fargostreet.com/post/14797Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:34:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:29:54 GMT]]>i think the new mustangs look mean as hell. the gt's anyway..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14796https://fargostreet.com/post/14796Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:29:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:14:54 GMT]]>

My NOva wrote:
why do you say retro? the back side does have that 69 - 70s look to it but its still a 2005... those are some impressive numbers for a stock mustang 😄
Uh...retro as in influenced by an older style. The lines are very reminiscent of a late 60's early 70's model.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14793https://fargostreet.com/post/14793Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:14:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:13:22 GMT]]>when the PCM is cracked? (EEC dammit!)

been there, done that. I beleive they pushed another 20-25 out of it...would have to dig it up on the interweb again.

Very few mods (Tuned, Exhaust, and MT ET Streets IIRC) they went 12.45.......

Stock they're not my favorite looking car.....but nothing ever is. Needs to be dropped about 2" and running a 18"x9 wheel.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14790https://fargostreet.com/post/14790Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:13:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:09:41 GMT]]>

HandoEX wrote:
The new design is very retro looking. I kinda like the new look...it's different. Impressive numbers.
why do you say retro? the back side does have that 69 - 70s look to it but its still a 2005... those are some impressive numbers for a stock mustang 😄

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14787https://fargostreet.com/post/14787Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:09:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:26:15 GMT]]>I myself like the looks for the most part, but the car itself is different to drive. It seems noisy and "choppy"- that's the best way I can explain it. It will be exciting to see how crazy these cars will get, as the aftermarket is going to be saturated with more parts than the '87-'93 cars ever had. The bottom ends are rumored to still only be good for 400 whp... Time will tell

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14776https://fargostreet.com/post/14776Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:26:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:10:23 GMT]]>The new design is very retro looking. I kinda like the new look...it's different. Impressive numbers.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14775https://fargostreet.com/post/14775Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:10:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to '05 Mustang GT dyno on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:59:57 GMT]]>

dynotune wrote:
Brand new, with window stickers from local dealer. This is the new 3v 4.6L. Car was a 5 speed with 68 miles on it. Judging by the A/F and conservative timing in PCM, there will be room for another 15-25 in programming when the PCM is cracked. From a week or two ago... I just thought the site needed some performance related threads. Thanks

It's just to bad that car is hideous. I drove through Luther Ford the other day and they had some on the lot. Not my idea of a good lookin car.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/14773https://fargostreet.com/post/14773Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:59:57 GMT