<![CDATA[Crazy Ricer Chick]]>So a bit ago i was driving and i saw this car and i was at first like hmmm Shane's got a buddy. Then i saw that it was a chick, and older one. She then preceded to weave through traffic, speeding of course. Pretty funny though..
legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/8883/crazy-ricer-chickRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 04:35:55 GMTSat, 30 Dec 2006 02:08:41 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:14:45 GMT]]>I think on ice, the weight would favor momentum more than traction, haha.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135348https://fargostreet.com/post/135348Mon, 01 Jan 2007 06:14:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:23:43 GMT]]>more wieght over the rear, also means more traction.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135332https://fargostreet.com/post/135332Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:23:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:44:05 GMT]]>

bluejays wrote:
driving the mid engine rwd in slick conditions is a bit harder then normal rwd, because of the extra weight in the back gains more inertia in a slide then a front engine rwd. its harder to correct.

holy cow you still alive!!!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135300https://fargostreet.com/post/135300Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:44:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:37:37 GMT]]>

97slowgsx wrote:
im sure she drives the car daily.......

or only when its crappy out

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135286https://fargostreet.com/post/135286Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:37:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:21:00 GMT]]>driving the mid engine rwd in slick conditions is a bit harder then normal rwd, because of the extra weight in the back gains more inertia in a slide then a front engine rwd. its harder to correct.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135285https://fargostreet.com/post/135285Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:21:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:54:51 GMT]]>

97slowgsx wrote:
im sure she drives the car daily.......
she might...idk

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135186https://fargostreet.com/post/135186Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:54:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:54:44 GMT]]>i cant wait to see it....since she is hot:)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135185https://fargostreet.com/post/135185Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:54:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:48:51 GMT]]>im sure she drives the car daily.......

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135181https://fargostreet.com/post/135181Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:48:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:39:21 GMT]]>well that is good to hear

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135178https://fargostreet.com/post/135178Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:39:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:38:38 GMT]]>this thread is funny.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135177https://fargostreet.com/post/135177Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:38:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:22:18 GMT]]>I knew what motor was in the car, a long time ago.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135166https://fargostreet.com/post/135166Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:22:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:17:31 GMT]]>

97jeep wrote:
no the motor. but that was already adressed by tony

in that link it tells the engine type under specs....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135160https://fargostreet.com/post/135160Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:17:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:13:40 GMT]]>

BumpinJCC wrote:
From what i saw, she was hot.

i think it would be kinda hard to tell what the person looks like. you can see sh*t in the cars.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135158https://fargostreet.com/post/135158Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:13:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:07:21 GMT]]>

00**** wrote:
Elise? lotus

no the motor. but that was already adressed by tony

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135155https://fargostreet.com/post/135155Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:07:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:06:06 GMT]]>Shanes is an Exige not an Elise

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135154https://fargostreet.com/post/135154Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:06:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:45:16 GMT]]>http://www.lotuscars.com/

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135151https://fargostreet.com/post/135151Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:45:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:43:49 GMT]]>It's a Toyota 2ZZ-GE motor...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135150https://fargostreet.com/post/135150Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:43:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:39:14 GMT]]>no.... if i recall shane i think from tintmasters has an orange car like that.. lotus elise

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135149https://fargostreet.com/post/135149Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:39:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:35:56 GMT]]>google!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135148https://fargostreet.com/post/135148Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:35:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:34:56 GMT]]>

97jeep wrote:
who its made buy????

Elise? lotus

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135147https://fargostreet.com/post/135147Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:34:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:31:12 GMT]]>who its made buy????

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135146https://fargostreet.com/post/135146Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:31:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:11:32 GMT]]>Dohc not single

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135142https://fargostreet.com/post/135142Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:11:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Crazy Ricer Chick on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:09:50 GMT]]>nope...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/135141https://fargostreet.com/post/135141Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:09:50 GMT