<![CDATA[Evo X]]>LINK

I hate evo's, not because they are bad cars in anyway, but on principle.

On the the other hand, Otional Sequential gear boX!!

Looks like a mean version of the subaru LEgacy

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/9016/evo-xRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 06:54:03 GMTTue, 09 Jan 2007 23:20:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:42:14 GMT]]>automatic??????????????????????????????????? wtf

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137065https://fargostreet.com/post/137065Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:42:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:14:34 GMT]]>I like it. More subtle and classy without losing its edge.

Sort of a bold move but it seems to move it up in class with other cars, besides other take home rally cars. Almost a more TSX or G35 competition (without being looking like every other 17yr old with vtehc and 15second timeslips.)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137059https://fargostreet.com/post/137059Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:14:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:39:07 GMT]]>along with subaru

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137050https://fargostreet.com/post/137050Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:39:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:51:01 GMT]]>paddleshifters are pimp

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137038https://fargostreet.com/post/137038Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:51:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:40:24 GMT]]>

MethodlesS wrote:
On the the other hand, Otional Sequential gear boX!!

Great, I wonder how long that is gonna last. Mitsubishi really needs to just have someone else do their trannies.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137034https://fargostreet.com/post/137034Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:40:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:54:38 GMT]]>it looks like the 9's older uglier heavier sister

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137017https://fargostreet.com/post/137017Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:54:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:32:04 GMT]]>i think that they did a little too much to the car all at once. They should have made little changes every year vs all in one shot. the head lights are deffinately bad ass but the rest of the front end just doesnt quite look right, especially considering this is a rally car. i also think this car could look a lot better with different paint.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137008https://fargostreet.com/post/137008Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:32:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:23:24 GMT]]>Whatever, that thing is fuckin' pimp.

Edit: It's nice to see that they dumped the rental-car interior design.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/137006https://fargostreet.com/post/137006Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:23:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:53:12 GMT]]>

thurmanmerman wrote:
the new evo and the new sti/wrx are fucked up... GAY!!!
i partially agree. i like the body styles but the front ends are just stupid looking. i mean the paint doesnt even match.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136999https://fargostreet.com/post/136999Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:53:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:40:14 GMT]]>

wannabe wrote:
http://tn3-2.deviantart.com/fs7/300W/i/2005/264/8/8/do_not_fear_change_by_Docoe.jpg

i don't mind a little change but when you go and f everything up and just make it look dumb... its just dumb

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136993https://fargostreet.com/post/136993Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:40:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:38:27 GMT]]>

thurmanmerman wrote:
the new evo and the new sti/wrx are fucked up... GAY!!!
http://tn3-2.deviantart.com/fs7/300W/i/2005/264/8/8/do_not_fear_change_by_Docoe.jpg

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136990https://fargostreet.com/post/136990Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:38:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:35:02 GMT]]>the new evo and the new sti/wrx are fucked up... GAY!!!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136988https://fargostreet.com/post/136988Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:35:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:23:55 GMT]]>i like it a lot.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136982https://fargostreet.com/post/136982Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:23:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:16:37 GMT]]>the front looks gay but the rest is ok

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136977https://fargostreet.com/post/136977Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:16:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:08:35 GMT]]>i saw the concept of this last year at the new york auto show but i didnt realize they were replacing the evo with it. i didnt really like the concept and i dont think i like the actual production either.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136975https://fargostreet.com/post/136975Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:08:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:41:18 GMT]]>looks like a srt4 besides the headlights.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136969https://fargostreet.com/post/136969Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:41:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:34:38 GMT]]>They got rid of the bucket seats in the back..

Mabye it's just me, but I think it is gross looking. I would take a MR anyday over the X.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136968https://fargostreet.com/post/136968Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:34:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Evo X on Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:33:57 GMT]]>i dont like it, i think they ruined the evo..

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/136967https://fargostreet.com/post/136967Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:33:57 GMT