<![CDATA[The replacement for the Supra]]>Feast your eyes.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=15&article_id=4440

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/9110/the-replacement-for-the-supraRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:18:36 GMTWed, 17 Jan 2007 17:18:33 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to The replacement for the Supra on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:56:59 GMT]]>Do I hear the early rumblings of a 2JZ swap from Dave?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/138666https://fargostreet.com/post/138666Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:56:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The replacement for the Supra on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:09:01 GMT]]>Hopefully they toss that battery powered crap (extra weight) and put in a turbo'd motor.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/138650https://fargostreet.com/post/138650Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:09:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The replacement for the Supra on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:40:28 GMT]]>Concept cars have always looked that futuristic since the 60's. Hopefully they do put a toned-down version in production. Toyota really needs a car to fit that void of sports car class.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/138644https://fargostreet.com/post/138644Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:40:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The replacement for the Supra on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:33:23 GMT]]>IMHO is a step in the right direction but they need to tone it down a lot before it will sell...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/138642https://fargostreet.com/post/138642Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:33:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The replacement for the Supra on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:29:02 GMT]]>i like the wheels.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/138640https://fargostreet.com/post/138640Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:29:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The replacement for the Supra on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:24:09 GMT]]>Not too bad but if it does go into production it would look better than the concept model.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/138639https://fargostreet.com/post/138639Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:24:09 GMT