<![CDATA[Goddamn Liberal Congress...]]>Trying to pass another "Assault Weapons Ban"

Using scare tactics and everything to pass another worthless ban...Figured it was only a matter of time til the tree huggers tried it. Crime has just SKYROCKETED since the last ban sunset as we all know!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/9667/goddamn-liberal-congress...RSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 09:38:20 GMTThu, 01 Mar 2007 15:18:53 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:28:09 GMT]]>I believe it was Australia that either wanted or had banned swords as well. Hell cars kill many more people than guns....have we tried to ban them yet...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147427https://fargostreet.com/post/147427Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:28:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:34:26 GMT]]>Whats worse is how they are describing "assault weapons" Has anybody else looked at this? damn near anything thats not a blackpowder would be illegal. Its just ridiculous. Unfortunately this isnt the first attempted assault weapon ban, and it wont be the last. This is the same stuff that us law abiding gun owners have to fight constantly.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147422https://fargostreet.com/post/147422Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:34:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 06:47:44 GMT]]>

tjamz;157208 wrote:
Yet Canada (who has strict gun laws and is probably the nation most similar to the USA) has very low amounts of gun crimes committed. I'm still not in favor of an out-right ban, but I have no problems with background checks on anyone buying "assault" weapons.

they are a little different, hand guns are illegal and hunting rifles are very hard to get, theres permits to gets permits

plus more then half the country is grass and snow waste lands, anywho how can there be crime when all of them are either drunk, busy playing hockey or pluging each other in the butt and getting married

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147415https://fargostreet.com/post/147415Sat, 03 Mar 2007 06:47:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:35:21 GMT]]>Some other countries where in the past Gun Control "worked". Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, and Italy when Mousillini was in charge. I think we all know the types of things that went down there. The Holocaust and Stalin killed off like 20 million of his own people. Maybe if they would have had a way to defend themselves it would have been different. I have this great picture and quote having to do with this at home somewheres. An unarmed country is totally defenseless with the government, who knows if someday we end up having a wack job president, most of Germany thought Hitler was a great guy at first, but look what happens....

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147402https://fargostreet.com/post/147402Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:35:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:15:37 GMT]]>The differences between America and Korea is like comparing apples to oranges...Korea also doesn't have a 2nd Amendment.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147368https://fargostreet.com/post/147368Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:15:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:03:12 GMT]]>Korea has a ban on guns... and look @ the violent crime rate there... even thought he police force is a joke!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147364https://fargostreet.com/post/147364Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:03:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:55:51 GMT]]>Also, you do realize that the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 was a bipartisan effort, right? And that the majority of Republican Governors and Mayors support the bill as well? As do many in law enforcement.

(this coming from a guy who owns a couple AK47's)

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147359https://fargostreet.com/post/147359Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:55:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:50:00 GMT]]>

bubba;157175 wrote:
Hasn't anyone learned from what happend in Britain and Australia. Their crime rates skyrocketed after they banned their guns.

Yet Canada (who has strict gun laws and is probably the nation most similar to the USA) has very low amounts of gun crimes committed. I'm still not in favor of an out-right ban, but I have no problems with background checks on anyone buying "assault" weapons.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147358https://fargostreet.com/post/147358Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:50:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:28:05 GMT]]>gun banning...secular-progressive 101 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147355https://fargostreet.com/post/147355Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:28:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:18:44 GMT]]>:rolleyes:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147353https://fargostreet.com/post/147353Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:18:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:50:54 GMT]]>the democrats are just making plans with the terrosits so they can own us all!!! :), oh and mabey my post came out wrong, i love guns! i hate democrats!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147351https://fargostreet.com/post/147351Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:50:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:40:15 GMT]]>I'm a proud democrat and so is most of the rest of my family, but that's just ridiculous. I could see where they're coming from in wanting to ban assault weapons, but like bubba said, the people who do legally own them have to go through all kinds of tests/screens/paperwork to own them. If they're banned, law abiding people won't have them, but criminals sure as hell still will.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147333https://fargostreet.com/post/147333Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:40:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:24:34 GMT]]>Ya unfortunatly there isnt a whole lot we can do about it, just vote decent people into the system. For example, NO Hilary in any form of office, as well as pretty much any official in Maryland, New York and California (These states have some pretty bad gun laws, and always are leading the nation in trying to ban them), and also the UN, they are probably one of the worst influences on gun control. Only other option is if it happens fight back...

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147329https://fargostreet.com/post/147329Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:24:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:11:12 GMT]]>

bubba;157175 wrote:
Hasn't anyone learned from what happend in Britain and Australia. Their crime rates skyrocketed after they banned their guns. Do you honestly think that a criminal who legally can't own a firearm the way it is will turn in his weapons, NO. The only people that will are law-abiding citizens, which in the end will be defenseless to the criminals that have them. Shit if they spit on you for 10, I wonder what they'd do if you have a few hundred :icon_scratch: . I'd be damned to give up any of my guns, my family would too. That would be a good chunk of income they'd be taking away. And all this "assult weapons" talk, ok here's the truth: It has been illegal to own Fully-Automatic firearms since 1934 (also short barreled rifles and shotguns the same law). The only exceptions are certain ones and you have to go through a shit load of paperwork, and go through your sheriff and everything, and most likely you wont be able to have it. The way most of these people talk it sounds like there's people with machine guns running the streets.

Exactly what the Dems are trying to do in order to pass this ban and any other weapons limiting law, they use scare tactics and scary words that make uninformed people think it's something it isn't.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147326https://fargostreet.com/post/147326Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:11:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:05:33 GMT]]>Hasn't anyone learned from what happend in Britain and Australia. Their crime rates skyrocketed after they banned their guns. Do you honestly think that a criminal who legally can't own a firearm the way it is will turn in his weapons, NO. The only people that will are law-abiding citizens, which in the end will be defenseless to the criminals that have them. Shit if they spit on you for 10, I wonder what they'd do if you have a few hundred :icon_scratch: . I'd be damned to give up any of my guns, my family would too. That would be a good chunk of income they'd be taking away. And all this "assult weapons" talk, ok here's the truth: It has been illegal to own Fully-Automatic firearms since 1934 (also short barreled rifles and shotguns the same law). The only exceptions are certain ones and you have to go through a shit load of paperwork, and go through your sheriff and everything, and most likely you wont be able to have it. The way most of these people talk it sounds like there's people with machine guns running the streets.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147325https://fargostreet.com/post/147325Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:05:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:50:45 GMT]]>yes but in the end we are the ones with the guns, if they ever acctually made something to take them away from people there goes civil war 2, and thankfully i will be one of those owning about 10 guns while those tree huggers as you called them spit at me

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147321https://fargostreet.com/post/147321Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:50:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Goddamn Liberal Congress... on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:20:09 GMT]]>I will go on record saying that I do not endorse this action.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147002https://fargostreet.com/post/147002Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:20:09 GMT