<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Cadillac CTS or GTO (When available)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Just your guys' opinion.... wanna see what everyone thinks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/topic/97/cadillac-cts-or-gto-when-available</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 07:33:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fargostreet.com/topic/97.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 21:05:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cadillac CTS or GTO (When available) on Thu, 13 May 2004 00:16:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">i'd rather have the CTS-V with the ls6 in it. that will haul ass, it's got like 400 hp. and with all the aftermarket parts you can pump it to 500 easy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/801</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2004 00:16:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cadillac CTS or GTO (When available) on Sat, 08 May 2004 22:44:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">id have to say GTO as well. not only because the old 'goat' was a monster of a car, but id also assume that it would eventually have a lot more potential than a CTS would as far as aftermarket parts and whatnot. i could be completely wrong, but thats my guess.</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/654</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/654</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[amicheze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2004 22:44:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cadillac CTS or GTO (When available) on Sat, 08 May 2004 00:02:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Between those two, I'd have to vote the GTO.  I'm still a little off on the look of the GTO (looked like a sunfire/grand-am bastard child to me when I first saw it) but the combination of the V8 and a 6 speed driving the rear wheels would overcome any look deficients IMO.</p>
<p dir="auto">And to be honest, over the CTS I'd rather have a nice Black Lincoln LS<br />
<img src="http://www.crownvic.us/~kevin/LS%20Park4.JPG" alt="legacy image" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/646</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/646</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dubbsy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2004 00:02:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cadillac CTS or GTO (When available) on Fri, 07 May 2004 22:56:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">2k3WRXND wrote:<br />
Just your guys' opinion.... wanna see what everyone thinks.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">My preference would have to be the GTO because of the heritage and the fact that what you see is what you get.  There is only two options on the GTO; 4-speed automatic or 6- speed manual transmission (extra $695.00).  I would pay the extra $695 to row the gears myself and feel all 350 HP @ 5200 rpm, 365 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm.</p>
<p dir="auto">This link lets you pick one out:<br />
<a href="http://www.pontiac.com/byo/build.pg?make=pg&amp;makeId=002&amp;brand=divisional&amp;originatingBrand=" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.pontiac.com/byo/build.pg?make=pg&amp;makeId=002&amp;brand=divisional&amp;originatingBrand=</a></p>
<p dir="auto">I think the CTS is a pretty sweet car too, but it not my cup of tea.</p>
<p dir="auto">Lucas</p>
]]></description><link>https://fargostreet.com/post/645</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fargostreet.com/post/645</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Purple_94GT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 22:56:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>