<![CDATA[some sweet rims]]>work meisters s1 17x9 -69 17x10 -52 (those are suppost to be negative offsets)

legacy image

legacy image

legacy image

anyone know what these would even fit on/discuss.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/topic/9726/some-sweet-rimsRSS for NodeThu, 28 May 2026 16:23:58 GMTTue, 06 Mar 2007 07:47:26 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:59:00 GMT]]>^nice car, but the white is ugly

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147981https://fargostreet.com/post/147981Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:59:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:24:36 GMT]]>cool wheels but the white is ugly!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147921https://fargostreet.com/post/147921Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:24:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:31:03 GMT]]>wide body,scooped fender subaru?

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147912https://fargostreet.com/post/147912Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:31:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:27:30 GMT]]>

thurmanmerman;157763 wrote:
there was a guy on 240sxforums that ran i believe 10s all around on his s14... ill try and find the pics but if memory serves me right it had quite a big lip on the rims

Ya, so. Rim width is not the only thing that affects fitment. Its the offset. you could but a 17x9 +50 on a 240, but then put a 17x9 -50, and it will stick out 100mm further then the other 17x9.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147910https://fargostreet.com/post/147910Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:27:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:24:38 GMT]]>

KA-T_240;157752 wrote:
Ya, but you need to think about the offsets. For the fronts, if they were on a s14 you would need 80mm widebody, and not to mention you would not be able to turn. The rears would require at least a 60mm widebody, unless you run hardcore strected tires, and mad jdm camber.

legacy image

there was a guy on 240sxforums that ran i believe 10s all around on his s14... ill try and find the pics but if memory serves me right it had quite a big lip on the rims

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147909https://fargostreet.com/post/147909Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:24:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:09:15 GMT]]>very nice.

Gonna look sick on your car justin!

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147903https://fargostreet.com/post/147903Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:09:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:51:26 GMT]]>Ya, but you need to think about the offsets. For the fronts, if they were on a s14 you would need 80mm widebody, and not to mention you would not be able to turn. The rears would require at least a 60mm widebody, unless you run hardcore strected tires, and mad jdm camber.

legacy image

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147898https://fargostreet.com/post/147898Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:51:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:44:19 GMT]]>

bomexcivic00;157735 wrote:
hey those look familiar...:icon_thumright:

atta boy 🙂

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147885https://fargostreet.com/post/147885Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:44:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:15:04 GMT]]>hey those look familiar...:icon_thumright:

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147881https://fargostreet.com/post/147881Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:15:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:47:14 GMT]]>those would look damn perdy on my conquest as I can fit up to 11" wide wheels in the rear and 9's up front, I don't like the white though.

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147876https://fargostreet.com/post/147876Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:47:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to some sweet rims on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:26:30 GMT]]>Widebody s14

]]>https://fargostreet.com/post/147826https://fargostreet.com/post/147826Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:26:30 GMT