Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. The Parking Lot
  4. Production 2009 M3 Revealed

Production 2009 M3 Revealed

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Parking Lot
29 Posts 18 Posters 1.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MisterCMKM Offline
    MisterCMKM Offline
    MisterCMK
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    leftlanenews.com wrote:
    The M3's V8 powerplant has two more cylinders than its predecessor, delivering 420 hp from 4.0 litters and maximum torque of 295 lb-ft at 3,900 rpm. In keeping with BMW's high-revving "M" tradition, maximum engine speed is 8,300 rpm.

    Meh, no power down low and a severe lack of torque. blah

    FASTER THAN DUBBSY

    > thrash;315544 wrote:
    > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
    >
    > Ford is back :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MisterCMKM Offline
      MisterCMKM Offline
      MisterCMK
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      torbs;163109 wrote:
      stock V8 that revs over 8k:icon_salut:

      So what? It just means you have to spool the piss outta that thing to make power

      FASTER THAN DUBBSY

      > thrash;315544 wrote:
      > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
      >
      > Ford is back :)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • integra_gsr98I Offline
        integra_gsr98I Offline
        integra_gsr98
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        I personally think it looks great.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          thrash
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          MisterCMK;163197 wrote:
          So what? It just means you have to spool the piss outta that thing to make power

          I don't think that's accurate. Note that the torque is nearly constant across several thousand RPM. The M engines are horsepower/top end biased on purpose because many customers find those engines are more fun to drive than stump pullers.

          It's still a 4 liter V8. 300 ft/lbs of torque everywhere isn't bad, and horsepower that builds linearly with revs all the way to the redline is pretty cool.

          F1 cars only make around 250-275 ft/lbs of torque.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MisterCMKM Offline
            MisterCMKM Offline
            MisterCMK
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            eh, it still doesn't have a whole lot of torque. Torque is what makes a car fun to drive and what puts you back in your seat. Thats what I love about my 302. I start making power at 2,000rpm so its fun as hell from stop light to stop light.

            FASTER THAN DUBBSY

            > thrash;315544 wrote:
            > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
            >
            > Ford is back :)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 3_Series3 Offline
              3_Series3 Offline
              3_Series
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              It still makes max torque at just shy of 4k, not bad for an engine that revs to 8300rpm. It all depends on preference really. For example, I love the free revving nature of my engine and the wonderful sound it makes at 7k. Can't say I'm a big fan of the thrashiness of a pushrod engine when the revs climb. No it doesn't make a whole lot of power at 2k, but that's what makes it fun, wringing it out for all its worth.

              Just my .02

              2002 Subaru Legacy
              1993 BMW 325i (sold)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                thrash
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                MisterCMK;163206 wrote:
                eh, it still doesn't have a whole lot of torque. Torque is what makes a car fun to drive and what puts you back in your seat. Thats what I love about my 302. I start making power at 2,000rpm so its fun as hell from stop light to stop light.

                I don't think that's true at all. What makes a car fun to drive is a combination of the drivers preferences and the "total package".

                The Honda S2000 is fantastic to drive and is utterly torqueless. But there is something about the F20C that begs you to just wind it out to 9k rpm every time. If you're not looking to light up tires and stop light race... if you want to just hear and feel the engine scream... that car is amazing.

                Sport bikes are also pretty torque-constrained but i hear they're quite the rush as well 🙂

                Again - your 302 (hopefully) has more torque than any modern F1 car. But i know which one I'd rather drive, and if you're honest and/or not a dumbass, you'll agree with me -- we'd both rather drive a 750hp, 275 ft/lb F1 car that has a 19000 rpm redline and linear torque/hp rise over its entire range, because the "package" on an F1 car is unlike anything else in the universe.

                As I am fond of pointing out.. there are lots of streetable engines in town putting down 2-3000 lb/ft of torque.. just stop by the Butler dealership. Of course, none of those engines or the vehicles they sit in are any fun at all on the street (well, not in a speed/acceleration way... of course everyone likes driving heavy equipment for the novelty of it)

                I won't rehash any stupid analogies about what hp is and what torque is. I'll close by saying that evalating a car based on its paper numbers is foolhardy and is the stuff of bench racing. You learn about what a car is really like by driving it, and this is a place where BMW never disappoints, even if I do lament that the cars get heavier and softer every year.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ErikE Offline
                  ErikE Offline
                  Erik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  "In keeping with BMW's high-revving "M" tradition, maximum engine speed is 8,300 rpm. The engine is the lightest V8 in the world, weighing less than the previous M3's inline-six"

                  This was the two winning points for me. Even though some of you don't like that.

                  They call me, old man...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Sweet-WRX-LovinS Offline
                    Sweet-WRX-LovinS Offline
                    Sweet-WRX-Lovin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Thrash I understand that the M3s have always had great motors. I've just always thought they should have a V8, personal opinion, nothing more. Although the last inline 6 they had in there got me all excited when I thought about it. Did I just type that?

                    Mmmm high reving V8, delicious.

                    Edit: I can totally see what you are saying about losing their heritage. I think the STi limited is for pussies and granpas. It should've been lighter and more powerful, not just "toned down" in looks and heavy. I guess that's why the aftermarket exists so we can make the cars into what we think they should be.

                    One time...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • blindsp1B Offline
                      blindsp1B Offline
                      blindsp1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      Tad218;163110 wrote:
                      i like the current style more
                      Me too!

                      95 eclipse gs=sold:icon_cheers:
                      99 eclipse gst spyder=SOLD!!!!!!:icon_thumright: :icon_farao:
                      Old Car: 1995 honda civic EX SOLD
                      New Bike: 08 zx-6r FOR SALE
                      New G6: Project BLACK OUT! Sold
                      05 Yukon

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • youngin2nrY Offline
                        youngin2nrY Offline
                        youngin2nr
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        I just nut in my underwear. That thing is AMAZING!!

                        legacy image

                        3 things i couldn't live without.........
                        :3gears: -> :drink: -> :poon:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • MisterCMKM Offline
                          MisterCMKM Offline
                          MisterCMK
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          I understand your point thrash and it makes sense. All I am saying is that for around town stoplight to stoplight having the power down low is a helluva lot more fun and thats what I like about my car.

                          FASTER THAN DUBBSY

                          > thrash;315544 wrote:
                          > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
                          >
                          > Ford is back :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Spec_RS Offline
                            Spec_RS Offline
                            Spec_R
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            The front-end somewhat reminded me of the z4 and the back looks like some sort of Mercedes. The body is more stylish then the previous models. But the engine was what made me fell in love with this car. You guys may thinks it looks butt ugly now but when you see it out of the picture, maybe have a different opinion. If you're interested in luxary, style, lots of power, high reving. Then this is it.

                            legacy image

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • MisterCMKM Offline
                              MisterCMKM Offline
                              MisterCMK
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              Like I said on TCStangs, it'd make a nice winter beater. 😄

                              FASTER THAN DUBBSY

                              > thrash;315544 wrote:
                              > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
                              >
                              > Ford is back :)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                slowvo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                regardless of what i think of the car, mrcmk is fucking retarded

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • MisterCMKM Offline
                                  MisterCMKM Offline
                                  MisterCMK
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  slowvo;163401 wrote:
                                  regardless of what i think of the car, mrcmk is fucking retarded

                                  Who is this mrcmk? If it is me that you are referring to, you may address me as MisterCMK. 😄

                                  FASTER THAN DUBBSY

                                  > thrash;315544 wrote:
                                  > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
                                  >
                                  > Ford is back :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups