Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. The Parking Lot
  4. new vtec (avtec)

new vtec (avtec)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Parking Lot
30 Posts 15 Posters 943 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MisterCMKM Offline
    MisterCMKM Offline
    MisterCMK
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Ford has had butterfly valves in the intakes on a number of their motors. From the 2.0 SPI to the 4.0 SOHC to the 4.6 DOHC

    FASTER THAN DUBBSY

    > thrash;315544 wrote:
    > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
    >
    > Ford is back :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SmitEvoS Offline
      SmitEvoS Offline
      SmitEvo
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      Ford sucks though.....

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • integra_gsr98I Offline
        integra_gsr98I Offline
        integra_gsr98
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        Volvo I believe will be the first company to market w/ Pneumatic valves. Garberg would probably know more.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • treimcheT Offline
          treimcheT Offline
          treimche
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          GarageAlchemist;170940 wrote:
          I believe shorter runners would make more power up top, and longer down low?

          94NDTA;170942 wrote:
          No.

          Actually YES. Short runners = better high RPM power. Long runners = better low RPM power and more torque.

          94NDTA;170947 wrote:
          Explain. Like they had one butterfly valve open at lower rpms, and another on a different length runner tha would open at higher RPM?

          It's simple, there's essentially 8 different intake runners. Normally the air passes through the long runners. Butterfly opens at a certain RPM to pass the air through the short runners, instead of the long ones.

          thrash;170992 wrote:
          I wish there were some engineering drawings showing how this system worked. The variable length intake runner stuff isn't new.. although i can't think of an application off hand.

          Here's a link to Yamaha's website to give you a good idea. Move your cursor to the one thats' closest to the Yamaha symbol on the gas tank. http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/products/modelinnovation/6/0/innovation.aspx

          Troy
          2009 Yamaha R1
          2002 WRX
          2001 Toyota Tundra
          2001 Yamaha R6
          1988 Yamaha YSR 50
          2003 XR50

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 94NDTA9 Offline
            94NDTA9 Offline
            94NDTA
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            I'm going by what I know on V8 cars. V8's with higher intakes make more power up top, shorter intakes make more power in lower RPM ranges.

            By the way, off topic, Did you just get glasses recently?

            legacy image

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • treimcheT Offline
              treimcheT Offline
              treimche
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              Yes I did.

              Troy
              2009 Yamaha R1
              2002 WRX
              2001 Toyota Tundra
              2001 Yamaha R6
              1988 Yamaha YSR 50
              2003 XR50

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 94NDTA9 Offline
                94NDTA9 Offline
                94NDTA
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                I thought so.

                legacy image

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Ngige
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  94NDTA;171046 wrote:
                  I'm going by what I know on V8 cars. V8's with higher intakes make more power up top, shorter intakes make more power in lower RPM ranges.

                  By the way, off topic, Did you just get glasses recently?

                  mmmmmm i think you have this backwards, well compare the L98 tpi setup and the LT1. The tpi runners are exactly 17" long and thus the ability for the tpi to make a shit load of TQ in the lower rpm and less power @ higher rpm's. the LT1 makes more power up top because of the shotter runners thats why you see many people with the L98 switching to the mini ram (by TPIS runner length is about 3") or the stealth ram (by Holley) the super ram is also good but i dont like it. so all in all longr runners= monster TQ @ lower rpm's and less power up top and Shotter runners= less TQ @ lower rpm's and more HP up top.
                  The shorter the runner the higher the peak RPM, the higher the peak RPM, the higher the HP number. This is why the tpis mini ram, holley stealth ram and the LT1 intakes make so much more power than the TPI.

                  **From Chevy High Performance Mag


                  [I][I]If you’re looking for a bit more horsepower, you could also step up to the John Lingenfelter–designed ACCEL SuperRam intake. The SuperRam runners are shorter than the TPI runners to increase top-end horsepower while sacrificing little power below peak torque. We’ve had excellent results with this manifold, and on a 420ci small-block, we’ve made as much as 525 hp and 540 lb-ft of torque with this intake.*[/I][/I]

                  Francis Njau
                  1988 Pontiac Trans Am (Single 88mm Turbo)
                  1989 Pontiac Trans Am 3.8L Turbo (1-180 cloth Seats)
                  2004 Subaru STI (Stock)
                  (Gettn ready to bust a cap in sum-bady Ass)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 94NDTA9 Offline
                    94NDTA9 Offline
                    94NDTA
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    I get confused some times. I'm not perfect 😞

                    But that makes more sense to me.

                    You know GM basically ripped off the LT1 intake from an aftermerket design, I beleive it was TPIS set up.

                    legacy image

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Ngige
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      Thats cool no one perfect (and if they claim to be, they are full of pig shit), i get shit confused too. Just thought i should say a word or two.

                      Francis Njau
                      1988 Pontiac Trans Am (Single 88mm Turbo)
                      1989 Pontiac Trans Am 3.8L Turbo (1-180 cloth Seats)
                      2004 Subaru STI (Stock)
                      (Gettn ready to bust a cap in sum-bady Ass)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • GarageAlchemistG Offline
                        GarageAlchemistG Offline
                        GarageAlchemist
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        I thought so, i read over a ton of dyno tests with long and short intakes on honda's with obivously the longer ones making their power down low and the shorter ones up top. The SHO/yamaha motor had similar technology way back in 89.

                        97 GTi, 03 KJ

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups