Political Thread 2012
-
Rexwagon;326378 wrote:
Santorum. ND has spokenEmbarrassing. I wouldn't doubt it if liberals actually voted for him to screw it up. Heard rumors about it happening in Michigan.
One thing I know, if the republican candidate wants to win, they would be smart to make Paul the VP....he IS the swing vote.
-
PSiedTSi;326379 wrote:
Embarrassing. I wouldn't doubt it if liberals actually voted for him to screw it up. Heard rumors about it happening in Michigan.One thing I know, if the republican candidate wants to win, they would be smart to make Paul the VP....he IS the swing vote.
I agree with everything you just posted Tony. The ONLY way I vote Santorum is if Paul is the VP. Sadly I like Palin more than Santorum... she seems less crazy somehow.
-
You'd have to be crazy to think you could win using the lines Santorum is using. He is too far right, too unorganized, too much of a lobbyist to even be able to stand against Obama. He'd get wrecked like a freight train through a daycare.
-
You are probably right, but I don't think thats the "crazy" that Chuck was referring to.

GarageAlchemist;326382 wrote:
You'd have to be crazy to think you could win using the lines Santorum is using. He is too far right, too unorganized, too much of a lobbyist to even be able to stand against Obama. He'd get wrecked like a freight train through a daycare. -
DaveH;326381 wrote:
What specifically about Santorum makes him "crazy"?He actually wants to make sodomy and birth control illegal? And he calls himself a conservative? That's about as far reaching as the government can get...I mean come on...seriously? Need I go on?
Oh, did I mention what he said about Kennedy? JFK makes him vomit? He's a freakin' loose cannon. He flip-flopped on Title X in like 5 days...saying he only voted for it because of the attached items to it...when he specifically pointed out he supported it. And that brings up an annoyance I think we need to get rid of...attaching unrelated pieces of legislature to other bills to force it through.
On a side note, this might be the first time I have considered voting Republican/conservative in my life...and these candidates are not making it easy on me. I actually feel like Gingrich is the lesser of the 3 evils for some reason. Bottomline, none of them are strong candidates.
-
DaveH;326386 wrote:
He said that? Link?Santorum pointed to the landmark case, Lawrence v. Texas, where the U.S. Supreme Court overturned sodomy laws that were used to imprison gays and lesbians.
“And I stood up from the very beginning back in 2003 when the Supreme Court was going create a constitutional right to sodomy and said this is wrong we can’t do this,” Santorum said. ”And so I stood up when no one else did and got hammered for it. I stood up and I continue to stand up.”
And then this gem:
Santorum added, “I do not believe that sexual orientation should be added to hate crimes, but let me be honest, I don’t believe in hate crimes, period.”
That was just a quick google search.
Separation of church and state anyone?
I believe that this country is a great country, because as you mentioned we are given rights by God. And that God is not any God — it’s the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and that God when he gave us rights, he also said, ‘here are the laws by which your society is to be governed’ … What we should do is orient our laws to make sure they’re in conformity with the natural law. In conformity with God’s law. And we don’t. And when we don’t, we end up in big trouble.
Our country was founded by people that were running from.........................................
-
I should have added "please no cut n paste from the loonie left wing web sites".
I'd prefer a vid of it coming out of his mouth.Maybe I'm crazy too... I don't believe in hate crimes either. If you beat someone up because you don't like the color of their skin, or their ethinic background, their religious preference, etc, I could care less. You beat someone else up and you do the time for beating someone up. Your reasoning for beating someone up doesn't make a bit of difference, and shouldn't have any weigh in deciding the penalty IMO.
-
Santorum is everything the left hates about republicans. I don't despise all of the different moralistic stuff he talks about -- but hardly any of that stuff is the government's business.
Also, there is this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyYKjoZV1RsSo basically, fuck him

Also, Santorum has a huge spending problem, and is rock hard about getting us into a 5th war in Iran.
-
DaveH;326391 wrote:
WTF, where did my other post from last night go?This one?
http://www.fargostreet.com/forums/showthread.php?21244-Political-Thread-2012&p=326381#post326381
I think the video Thrash posted pretty much nailed it. From what I can tell his intentions are to force his morals of his God on the rest of the country. Are there general "ideals" that religions bring forth that can be used for the good of all? Absolutely! I'm a Lutheran so Christianity shouldn't be an issue for ME. But not everyone's brand of Christianity is the same. I was raised Catholic and there is no way in hell that I'd want the Catholic church setting the rules of this country.
I guess the short version is that while I have moved significantly further right in the past 8 years I have moved further from authoritarian and closer to libertarian, it's the only party that really makes sense to me.
I don't care if anyone is gay/straight/transgendered/bi. I am all for letting people of the same sex get married (I am also in favor of the churches having the authority to not recognize/perform these marriages if they so choose). I have no problem with gays/lesbians adopting kids. I have no problem with Planned Parenthood (which passed under Nixon btw w/ major bipartisan support) continuing to be funded by the federal government (not very libertarian of me, I know). I have an issue with abortion in almost every scenario imaginable. I am pro-gun and pro-personal rights, yet I don't necessarily believe that all rights are absolute (you can't yell fire in a movie theater for example). I'm pro keeping the government out of my business. I'm pro tax reform, even if it means that I personally pay more taxes (I paid a lower percentage each time I moved up a bracket as I had more deductions...I'm not quite at Romney/Buffet levels, but I'm under 20%) I ok with some regulation of industry, but currently believe that there are too many restrictions. I am pro smaller military numbers but not necessarily in favor of cutting technology spending and special forces training. I'm in favor of shutting down most of our overseas bases as well, though we do need some for strategic reasons (Diego Garcia, Germany, Okinawa and a few others come to mind). I believe everyone has a right to health care regardless of income, but I don't necessarily think they should be required to have health insurance.
I guess to some I just explained why I am crazy more than why I think Santorum is... so here is a copy & paste of some of the things I think makes him absolutely crazy
Rick Santorum wrote:
Santorum said Obama is a snob for wanting all Americans to go to college. Meanwhile Santorum has a B.A. from Pennsylvania State University, a M.B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh and a J.D. from the Dickinson School of Law. "President Obama once said he wants everybody in America to go to college. What a snob," Santorum said.Santorum said that President Kennedy’s famous 1960 speech pledging to keep Pope and politics separate “makes me want to throw up.”
Santorum said that the Supreme Court was wrong when it ruled in 1965 that married Americans have a right to privacy that includes the use of contraceptives.
Santorum said in his 2005 book, "It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good," that parents in two-income families aren't doing what's best for the kids, describing it as a sad situation created by "radical feminists" who undermined the traditional family by "convincing women that professional accomplishments are the key to happiness."
Santorum doesn't want women in combat because he says he worries that fighting men will be distracted by their "natural instinct" to protect women. He also says the differences in physical abilities between men and women aren't being taken into account.
Santorum wants to reinstate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that banned openly gay service members. Saying they, (Gays) "Keep it to yourself whether you're a heterosexual or a homosexual."
Some of those are outlined in the video as well, but I thought that I'd point them out again.
-
Nope, I wrote one out about the "separation of church and state" and the first ammendment. I'm guessing I will still have it on my computer at home so I'll try to cut n paste it tonite.
Trafik Jamz;326393 wrote:
This one?http://www.fargostreet.com/forums/showthread.php?21244-Political-Thread-2012&p=326381#post326381
-
Trafik Jamz;326393 wrote:
Some of those are outlined in the video as well, but I thought that I'd point them out again.Again, you guys are taking crap off the loonie left wing sites that try to make him look bad by taking small parts out of context. If you actually see the whole thing in context it usually makes a bit more sense. Like the "snob" comment. Here is the whole thing:
"President Obama once said he wants everybody in America to go to college, what a snob. There are good, decent men and women who go out and work hard every day and put their skills to test that aren't taught by some liberal college professor that (tries) to indoctrinate them."
Basically, he was sticking up for blue collar workers.
Check out the so called "quotes" above a little deeper and see what he really said and not what some left wing douche says that he said.

-
DaveH;326391 wrote:
WTF, where did my other post from last night go?I'm not a big fan of Santorum, I just wanted Chuck to explain to me why he is "crazy"

I had a written response to you as well lol, not going to re-write it but I agreed with a few of your points. I misinterpreted the hate crime statement, and I agree, there shouldn't be harsher penalties...they should be charged with assault or Murder 1, 2, 3 or whatever they committed. I thought he was more or less questioning the fact of hate crimes as a motive for said crimes. That's why I thought it was a little radical. And I'll admit, I hadn't heard that until I read that quick article on that site. I also wanted to point out that I merely did a quick google search for this quotes as I had heard them on mainstream media as video/voice clips previously. I don't frequent any of those crazy sites(or any political ones for that matter really), and I didn't read any other content other than the quotes I was looking to get at that time. I know its easy to spin something, but when it's a direct quote, not an excerpt, you can't really spin that so easily.
I wasn't about to touch the religion one as quite frankly I have pretty pointed views on the subject as a whole. I pretty much don't speak of religion with my family for this reason.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login