What would you rather own....

[Joel]

is there an R option in front of that s4?

[SmitEvo]

wannabe wrote:
is there an R option in front of that s4?

If you would like.......

[SmitEvo]

added an option........

[Joel]

i'll take an RS4 then!

[stephen bradley]

tie between s2000, and evo for me.
soooo, evo I guess.

[Joel]

just take your wing off, and there you go!

[Guest]

I'll take the EVO with a bulletproof drivetrain.

[amicheze]

i still hear the MR has WAY too much turbo lag. id say s4 if it was the TT v6 ('05 is v8, right?), so im going to have to go domestic on this one and say the stang.

...on second thought, after reading the bottom of the first post, ill say a Z.

[Guest]

amicheze wrote:
i still hear the MR has WAY too much turbo lag. id say s4 if it was the TT v6 ('05 is v8, right?), so im going to have to go domestic on this one and say the stang.

...on second thought, after reading the bottom of the first post, ill say a Z.
Don't all EVO's get the same turbo?

[stephen bradley]

05's got a slightly bigger hot side, but the 6speed should help keep you out of lag.

[Guest]

can we get an STi Spec-C thrown in there?

[treimche]

EVO MR all the way. I don't mind a little bit of lag, just have to shift down a gear and look no more lag!

[SmitEvo]

tjamz wrote:
can we get an STi Spec-C thrown in there?

Didnt want to make it a pissing match between the evo and sti.......the evo already has won hands down numerous times

[btleier]

s4

[2wheeler]

Mustang

[LT1]

S4

[DaveH]

Are you guys saying that a Evo with a stock turbo has anything even closely related to lag? LOL

I picked the 350Z, then I'd put a turbo kit on it.

[Guest]

Looks like the EVO MR is winning w00t!

[Guest]

99slowGSX wrote:
Didnt want to make it a pissing match between the evo and sti.......the evo already has won hands down numerous times

not against a spec-c it wouldn't. GUARANTEED.

[Parker]

spec-c's rule.....