Not your ordinary ricer car

[STiSchucky]

nicks a crab ass. no loving from me till he changes his rag.

[NickB]

YellowEvo wrote:
i still love you nicky
i love you too

[legacy-user-33]

YellowEvo wrote:
tell your brother to put one in, you drive it then tin, and we'll see who wins k? solves it, it's like penny cash for your bro anyways

First of all I didn't offer a race did I? I just wanted to prove how stupid and retarded kirk is. He should keep his mouth shut if he can barely recognizes the difference between a blow off valve and a wastegate. Second, my brother has the money, but he's not going to put $8,000 down just to fuck around with a 18/19 year old kid who's mowing lawns for living. He has better things to do......

BTW I posted those pictures, because Jim mentioned it to me a while back.

[Jim]

AcesHigh wrote:
9.2 PSI is a mediocre 1.2 PSI increase. The general rule of thumb is each pound of boost you add will make the same amount of horsepower equal to your compression ratio. It will have made less than 10 horses upping it that high. And besides, most people increase their boost during a track day run anyways.

*All * (competent) turbo kits include engine management and extra fuel delivery devices. Being able to make that kind of power without an intercooler opens up the potential of even more power. I wouldn't exactly count the Z out at a launch; although it doesn't have AWD, it does have a considerable amount of torque over a 4g63.

It could probably do it.

Back to the original post... that Z is hideous.

What im saying is that power isn't going to be made by the average joe blow who straps on a TT kit to his z. Also, that kit was intercooled....

I'd put $100 on the Evo killing it on the launch.

[STiSchucky]

so...why are we talking about tt z's when tins bro wont even do it. tony from frozen and dairy said his z could take your brothers, tin.

[legacy-user-33]

RX8ownage wrote:
so...why are we talking about tt z's when tins bro wont even do it. tony from frozen and dairy said his z could take your brothers, tin.

I don't why people started saying the Z could beat that and this........

[legacy-user-33]

RX8ownage wrote:
Oh and Tin, let's atleast see a pic or 2 of the Z. just for shits.

dyno vids
http://www.airpowersystems.com.au/350z/aps_tt_exhaust_dyno_nocats.wmv

[Jim]

I dont really care who can beat who... It's still a pimp car!

[Jim]

T ! N wrote:

dyno vids
http://www.airpowersystems.com.au/350z/aps_tt_exhaust_dyno_nocats.wmv

Thats fucked up! See how the exhaust goes over the intake pipes ? Wierd! Also how the UICP is like 2 inches away from the right side exhaust pipe?

[legacy-user-33]

Jim wrote:
I dont really care who can beat who... It's still a pimp car!

EXACTLY!!!

[Jim]

T ! N wrote:
EXACTLY!!!

Its the ricer mentaility

[YellowEvo]

never said it wasn't a sweet car

[STiSchucky]

nick chipped in about it being the evo killa and what not and it went south from there.

[legacy-user-33]

RX8ownage wrote:
nick chipped in about it being the evo killa and what not and it went south from there.

You, nick and joe argues like little girls.....

[Guest]

I wouldn't mind a Z, crap might be slower but it sure as hell looks nice. But IMO they are overpriced for what they are. Still, sweet ride Tin.

[STiSchucky]

They got nice interiors, drake. can't rule that out.

[Guest]

They have BEAUTIFUL interiors. Never did I say that, just a lot of money. They have very nice features in the interior. I guess I'm just getting "old" I don't want a fast car anymore, they get me in trouble. I just want a luxury ride.

[STiSchucky]

lol, im just using it as a phrase like "its over priced, ugly and a just an overall piecer...............................................but its got a nice interior"

[Guest]

Harsh Kirk, harsh. Then again ALL cars compared to our subies have nice interiors. Actually I stand corrected STI's have nice interiors, ALL cars compared to the normal WRX have nice interiors

[legacy-user-33]

Speaking of interior, RX-8s are the best