I35W Bridge Collapsed in Minneapolis
-
civic91;179214 wrote:
i dont know about bumper to bumper because there wasnt that many cars on the parts that didnt completly fell but they could have moved off idk. i just think that you would have seen more cars parked on the edge.... dude it was bumper to bumper, the rest of the cars are underneath the rubble.
Have you ever been in that construction zone during rush hour?
-
http://www.in-forum.com/pdfs/bridges_opt.pdf
Report on the bridge in 2001.....
-
-
tjamz;179219 wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/08/02/vosli.mn.i35w.bridge.collapse.side.view.cnnvideo of it falling
That is crazy that it all came down at once so quickly. I figured someone had to have gotten video of it with traffic cams or something, but hadn't seen one yet.
-
tjamz;179209 wrote:
To answer your questions one at a time here:No, I do not think up random shit.
**IF **jackhammer is causing a slight ripple that is traveling at the same frequency as the cars, the cars would essentially push the wave taller and taller. I learned this basic principle in highschool physics.
I also have no way of proving/disproving my statements, hence the 1 in a trillion guesstimate.
see the mythbusters episode? They were actually able to make an entire bridge vibrate with a fairly small weight however they were quick to note it's nowhere near remotely capable of knocking over a bridge.
The only theory I've heard yet that I'll be willing to buy this early is the possible seperation of an expansion joint.
-
tjamz;179209 wrote:
To answer your questions one at a time here:No, I do not think up random shit.
**IF **jackhammer is causing a slight ripple that is traveling at the same frequency as the cars, the cars would essentially push the wave taller and taller. I learned this basic principle in highschool physics.
I also have no way of proving/disproving my statements, hence the 1 in a trillion guesstimate.
Then your high school physics should explain how that frequency could establish sympathetic vibration to "match and push the wave taller and taller' which must be required to.
The frequency of that jackhammer in that small of distortion area, even let us assume that there is 30 of them, chained hypothetically side to side, would fail to create that frequency require for the support to bend, look at the pictures it is due to one of the large pilers crippling.
What more of the issue is, for anyone who lives in the metro, please take a jump in the miss. river in comparison to the past 10 years, during the spring/summer season it is extremely volatile towards its northbound push, it is more then likely the failed support piler beneath that (Soot) was eroded, and thus it crippled.
This is a pure educated guess, and is not factual, however many expert PE and CE's are concurring to this, but will not be affirmed until maybe after 2 years of investigation.
-
In reality its just that everything necessary for the bridge to collapse happened at the exact same time. For all we know it could be there was a crack in the support, the water had eroded away more soil or whatever around the pillar, the train going by caused vibration that somehow when combined with the cars overhead and the jackhammers all added up to create a single wave with a HUGE amplitude that helped destroy the rest of that already cracked support which led to the collapse. None of those alone could have brought it down but when they all added up at that single point in time it did the entire bridge in.
We will really never know, the best we can do is say that the DOT and whoever else's investigation will give us a very good guess as to what led to the failure.
-
StangerBanger96;179269 wrote:
In reality its just that everything necessary for the bridge to collapse happened at the exact same time. For all we know it could be there was a crack in the support, the water had eroded away more soil or whatever around the pillar, the train going by caused vibration that somehow when combined with the cars overhead and the jackhammers all added up to create a single wave with a HUGE amplitude that helped destroy the rest of that already cracked support which led to the collapse. None of those alone could have brought it down but when they all added up at that single point in time it did the entire bridge in.We will really never know, the best we can do is say that the DOT and whoever else's investigation will give us a very good guess as to what led to the failure.
I agree with you 100%, I just don't agree that jackhammer(s) could cause anything to be remotely related to it though however, after my own research, and after consulting with 2 PE's (Certified and work for a firm located in the same building)
-
Nor do I say that they CAUSED the bridge to collapse. See my one in a trillion probability. Does no one read entire posts around here? Especially people who like to think they know the answer to everything? NOWHERE do I state that I think they were directly responsible. They may not have even added to the problem. So before you criticize my physics, I suggest you recheck your reading comprehension.
-
tjamz;179272 wrote:
Nor do I say that they CAUSED the bridge to collapse. See my one in a trillion probability. Does no one read entire posts around here? Especially people who like to think they know the answer to everything? NOWHERE do I state that I think they were directly responsible. They may not have even added to the problem. So before you criticize my physics, I suggest you recheck your reading comprehension.But thats what makes this website so fun is all the people that read the first 6 words and then reply...
-
BrianGriffin81;179270 wrote:
I agree with you 100%, I just don't agree that jackhammer(s) could cause anything to be remotely related to it though however, after my own research, and after consulting with 2 PE's (Certified and work for a firm located in the same building)Great, you just agreed with the same thing that I said before: > tjamz;179162 wrote:
The jackhammer alone could not take down the bridge, this is 100% true, but IF the jackhammer where causing reverberation across the entire bridge at precisely the right frequency AND if the cars were traveling at the exact right speed to amplify/spread the vibration across the bridge there is about a 1 in a trillion chance that it could have AIDED in the falling of the bridge
I guess I didn't add the vibration of the train and the addition of the water potentially eroding the pillars/silt, but I assumed some of this would be assumed since I said that AT MOST the jackhammers aided in the falling, not caused it. Either way, I'm fairly certain that the jackhammers are more likely to aid in the falling than preventing the fall.
-
StangerBanger96;179273 wrote:
But thats what makes this website....No, JIM made this website....geez!
-
DaveH;179286 wrote:
The PE's here said it was the fat lady in the blue minivan farting that caused the bridge to go down. You know, resonant frequencies and such.....
Could be...could be....
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login