Ron Paul
-
SmitEvo;198481 wrote:
I just dont expect the government to pay for that. Education yes....luxury housing no. It is comparing apples to oranges.Well, according to your value system, sure.
Getting to dick around and drink and nail easy women for 4-5 years on somebody elses dime, while occsionally rolling into class now and then sounds like luxury to me!
I'm willing to listen to arguments that the government should be in the subsidizing education business, but not when those arguments have an expectation that the government "give" you an education as an axiomatic premise, or that people somehow have an intrinsic right to an unspecified level of educational instruction.
There are a lot of strange perverse affects of the government financial aid system. You've seen some of them mentioned in this thread.
Certainly I'm not against financial aid. I'm worried about government financial aid -- it never comes with no strings attached (potentially a good thing), but they're usually the wrong strings (a bad thing). Invariably the government will manipulate the education market by withholding money from institutions that don't capitulate to its whims.
In this sense, federal financial aid is just another backdoor mechanism for the feds to regulate education.
The excess demand from students created by loose aid money has the same effect on the education market as it did on the housing market. I'm not interested in bailing out all that bad economic decision making.
-
thrash;198480 wrote:
I've got a kid now and I know I "should" be saving for him to go to college, but I dont think it's going to be a worthwhile investment in 18 more years unelss some things dramatically change.I feel bad for your kid with ideas like yours. You aren't saving for him to go to college, yet you don't think the government should offer financial aid?? So unless you expect your kids to get full rides, you better have some plan because otherwise they will just end up with a high school diploma. And if things go how you think, that everyone will have a college degree in the future, your kids will need at least that.
torbs;198330 wrote:
He really seems to go back to traditional conservativism (no income tax and replacing it with NOTHING, i love the idea...however, in order to do that we'd have to get rid of the 16th ammendment, which may not be the easiest thing to doHow much will they have to cut to get rid of income tax if they don't replace it with something?? I understand they would save some by just cutting the programs and the ppl working for them, but i doubt if it will make up for how much they are no longer bringing in.
-
thrash;198485 wrote:
Well, according to your value system, sure.Getting to dick around and drink and nail easy women for 4-5 years on somebody elses dime, while occsionally rolling into class now and then sounds like luxury to me!
I'm willing to listen to arguments that the government should be in the subsidizing education business, but not when those arguments have an expectation that the government "give" you an education as an axiomatic premise, or that people somehow have an intrinsic right to an unspecified level of educational instruction.
There are a lot of strange perverse affects of the government financial aid system. You've seen some of them mentioned in this thread.
Certainly I'm not against financial aid. I'm worried about government financial aid -- it never comes with no strings attached (potentially a good thing), but they're usually the wrong strings (a bad thing). Invariably the government will manipulate the education market by withholding money from institutions that don't capitulate to its whims.
In this sense, federal financial aid is just another backdoor mechanism for the feds to regulate education.
The excess demand from students created by loose aid money has the same effect on the education market as it did on the housing market. I'm not interested in bailing out all that bad economic decision making.
See now your stereotyping that all colleges students do is get drunk and have sex with women and not focus on school So you basically did the same thing then right? But somehow you got your shit together and are in the process of a graduate degree. Why more school? Didnt get enough of that in your undergrad? I think the main point is we know there are some bad apples out there that may take advantage of the system, but there are also some good students just like yourself who became smarter and invested into education. I am not saying that you used any federal aid, but not everyone is lucky like you. If the government was not in the business than major financial institutions would be charging us alot more in interest. If you compare any of my federal and private loans, the higher interest rate goes to the private companies. Just think if they had control of everything. Either way this could be argued forever and without true financial data that the government is getting screwed by backing loans that create revenue for them, I am done. I understand that inflation, cpi, and other economic factors way in on almost every level. In my opinion this is just better for the American Public so we can keep up with other countries education levels and keep our jobs and not give them to some immigrant who moved here because we are not skilled enough to perform the job. -
inspector01;198490 wrote:
I feel bad for your kid with ideas like yours. You aren't saving for him to go to college, yet you don't think the government should offer financial aid?? So unless you expect your kids to get full rides, you better have some plan because otherwise they will just end up with a high school diploma.This is getting waaay off topic, but there are student loans and you can work your way through school. Thats how I did it. It built a lot of character and you really appreciate school a lot more than if you go for free.
That said, I started college funds for my kids. Go figure.
DaveH
'94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph -
I agree that ppl should pay towards their college education and i don't necessarily care if the government gives away money for school. As far as i know, the government doesn't pay for ppls schooling, they may give some money (a small portion of ppls tuition), but the rest is loans. I support financial aid for loans to students at better rates and make them easier to get since i can't get federal loans and that sucks.
-
SmitEvo;198492 wrote:
See now your stereotyping that all colleges students do is get drunk and have sex with women and not focus on schoolwell, i was mostly trying to be funny, and i was trying to point out that "luxury" and "education" aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. How many people here are 1st-generation college students? Maybe your parents or their parents didn' go to college and had a perfectly wonderful life.
Basically, I object to the idea that everybody has the "right" to attend college and that the government is going to pay for it if need be.
If the government was not in the business than major financial institutions would be charging us alot more in interest. If you compare any of my federal and private loans, the higher interest rate goes to the private companies.
A good investment is still a good investment at a slightly higher rate? Maybe if the cost of college is just a little bit dearer, people will take it more seriously? I agree that you and I probably won't take this argument anywhere.. and getting rid of financial aid isn't something i feel strongly about either way. I mostly wanted to respond to below...
In my opinion this is just better for the American Public so we can keep up with other countries education levels and keep our jobs and not give them to some immigrant who moved here because we are not skilled enough to perform the job.
Ok, here, I think you are 100% off base.
America is great because of the people that work hard, not because of who gets born here. I want every single smart, hard working person from every other country to come here. That makes life better for all of us, and it continues to make America the #1 place to live.
I want people who are lazy, who expect others to pay for them, and who expect that by virtue of where their parents got knocked up they ought to have their butt wiped for them from cradle to grave.... i want those people OUT.
The American dream isn't being born in America and having an easy life.
The American dream is coming to America, where a free society will unbridle you to do your best work, to be all that you are capable of, and to be rewarded with the fruits of your own labor.
You better beleive i want the smartest people from around the world coming here and "taking jobs".
The only reason you and I aren't speaking German right now is because Germany unfortuneately decided to make it very difficult to be a Jewish scientist early in the 1900s. We developed our nuclear program with their people before they developed their own.
Smart people are attracted to a free society where the fruits of ones own labor and intellect are rewarded. We want to attract the best talent from all over the world, not ensure that Larry Whitebread never loses his job to a "furrener".
But this isn't even a zero-sum game. There's no reason we cannot import smart people, develop our own smart people, and have useful roles for people that aren't world-wide super geniuses. The issue is about attitude, not about capability. And people with an attitude of entitlement are choking this country to death..
If you're talking about keeping illegal immigrants out, I'm right there with you. But for people that want to get here legally so they can work, we need to make that dirt simple. And for people that are high-power-earners with high-demand skills, we need to be recruiting them from other countries, and not doing the crazy crap we do now that makes it so hard for them to get here and stay here.
-
inspector01;198490 wrote:
How much will they have to cut to get rid of income tax if they don't replace it with something?? I understand they would save some by just cutting the programs and the ppl working for them, but i doubt if it will make up for how much they are no longer bringing in.Bring spending levels down to what they were in 2000...The federal income tax only accounts for 1/3 of the total federal budget...meaning if there was no federal income tax, the feds would still have $1.8 trillion to spend...
-
GarageAlchemist;198444 wrote:
i wasnt eligible for any federal aid this year because my parents income, parents who dont help me pay for school at all. so i really dont care about money from the government, all ive done is pay them so far in my life time.Im in the same boat my dad who claims me as a dependant pays my car insurance that is it nothing more has not given me a more than 50 bucks since i started college. Him making 100,000 plus dollars a year get me no financial aid shitty situation.
-
bubba;198483 wrote:
You can get into college with bad act or sat scores...just not gonna be some high end one...I think some community colleges dont have a cut off....and if u cant do good on them you'll get buried in college anyways...As far as getting into college not sure how prestiguos people think NDSU is but you can be mildly retarded and make it into that school. They recommend certain GPA's or ACT scores but the will still let people in anyways.
-
http://ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=7479052
Although I understand that they could have interviewed 300 people or 300,000 people. Regardless, it is more publicity for Ron Paul, and shows he does have some support nationwide.
-
91teggy;198550 wrote:
As far as getting into college not sure how prestiguos people think NDSU is but you can be mildly retarded and make it into that school. They recommend certain GPA's or ACT scores but the will still let people in anyways.Aren't we Mr. High and Mighty?
-
Im not trying to be a dick im stating facts those are not requirements they are guidelines that they start at. My roommate my freshman was only allowed to take 10 credits and one of them was like math 99 adding subtracting multiply and divide. No shit i help him do it.
-
I beleive it's common for state schools to have admission policies with provisions like "anyone from this state will be admitted as long as they can pay for it". Not sure what NDSU has but it wouldn't surprise me to find some language like that in the admissions documents.
-
All the local campuses are easy as shit to get into...
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG_HuFtP8w8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DqY8iIxe2c
Awesome videos. Let me know if you want to see more, or just go to YouTube.com.
-
Bassplayer;198344 wrote:
Ron Paul sucks. I was really into him at first, but then I did some research about him. Acouple things that really pulled me away from him where that he wants to pull out of the United Nations and leave everything to all the other countries. Another thing is he wants to get rid of government sponsored things like COLLEGE FINANCIAL AID, medicare, and social security.Do you know how the United Nations works? The UN does almost nothing to help us as Americans, and in some occasions, even subverts our own Constitution with UN declarations.
Think about this for a second: what is financial aid? Isn't it just money loaned to you by the government at interest? It works like a massive cycle. The government taxes your money in taxes, the loans it back to you in order to fund your inflated education, all the while collecting interest on the money they've loaned you. I don't know if you have a job or not, but the amount I pay just in taxes every year would cover a full year at school. I don't agree with Ron Paul 100 per cent on everything; just on the things I think are most crucial for this country. Medicare and social security need massive reform and/or deletion as well. If you have anymore questions, just let me know.
-
StangerBanger96;198684 wrote:
All the local campuses are easy as shit to get into...Yes, I agree; and it's starting to anger me. NDSU is becoming flooded with students they don't have the infrastructure to handle. I think education is an important thing, however college degrees are becoming diluted at an increasing rate. A change to the way we pursue education in this country is needed.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvirM1goFq4&feature=related
^^^ Awesome CNBC interview about Ron Paul on monetary policy vs. Ben Bernanke.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNH5Xy8_0NM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZsZ0_OLer4&feature=related
^^^more CNBC analysis with Dr. Paul. IMO they're great.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login