Holy neat!

[D S ohM]

zbrown;234110 wrote:
def impressed with how seem-less it ran on the track and dyno

Maybe thats the key! You need two 4g63's in a DSM to keep it running and reliable.

[D S ohM]

Did anyone watch the video? I thought it was cool when he started the first motor up...then you hear him start the second one a few seconds later.

[SPANISH-RICE]

this thing is full of suck

[no_slow_clap]

SPANISH-RICE;234154 wrote:
this thing is full of suck

cuz its faster than the boost coupe??

[SPANISH-RICE]

cause it sucks. hes trying to sell that mess of fuck, cause as soon as ONE problem comes up this thing is probly out of commission. do you wanna back track and diagnose problems on this car that you had no part in building?

[no_slow_clap]

SPANISH-RICE;234158 wrote:
cause it sucks. hes trying to sell that mess of fuck, cause as soon as ONE problem comes up this thing is probly out of commission. do you wanna back track and diagnose problems on this car that you had no part in building?

that all depends if each engine has its own managment, then its like diagnosing a regular problem. but what other problems do you see happening other than drive trane?

[SPANISH-RICE]

every problem a normal dsm has. a fun track car maybe. but a 600hp street dsm with twice as many things that can go wrong or an auto 600hp track dsm( which just sounds like a bucket of fail waiting to spill).

not everyone needs to agree with me, im not trying to change anyones mind here. i just think its terrible. cool engineering into it but thats about it. still a dsm, actually 2

[no_slow_clap]

o im not saying you are wrong by any means. of course there is going to be problems. IMO i think just drive train is going to be an issue, not the engine itself. dsm's break because nobody tunes them properly...ever.

[gsrEK]

im inspired!!!!!!!!!! not

[no_slow_clap]

gsrEK;234172 wrote:
im inspired!!!!!!!!!! not

how is that NOT a surprise

[D S ohM]

no_slow_clap;234174 wrote:
how is that NOT a surprise

Exactly. spanish rice and gsrek love humping hondas. Fuckin haters. haha

[no_slow_clap]

D S ohM;234176 wrote:
Exactly. spanish rice and gsrek love humping hondas. Fuckin haters. haha

the understanding of "power" is far from honda....lol

[kylush]

DSM transmissions are kinda shitty, but other then that, I don't know wtf everyones problems with them are. Keep up on maintenance and what not and I havn't seen any problems with them that didn't come from abuse or neglect. I've heard of the 7 bolts crankwalking, but never actually met someone whos had it happen to them, and i've heard of other motors crankwalking too. I've had people tell me the 2JZ had crankwalk issues too. Blah..... haters...

Also dsms are anywhere from 9-19 years old. If you buy a 1g, even a 2g, it's an old car, stuff gets old, and chances are stuff needs to be replaced.

[DelSlow]

Say it once ill say it again, DSM's are only ever in 2 states. Broken and about to be broken.

[D S ohM]

DelSlow;234181 wrote:
Say it once ill say it again, DSM's are only ever in 2 states. Broken and about to be broken.

Very true. Remember...if your DSM ain't broke, you are!

[GnArKiLl]

ahhh feelin the dsm hate! haha no but i have talked to the owner of this car befor and he pretty much just did it to do it.

[zbrown]

This car is def. going to be more reliable than a dsm with just one engine trying to push 600 wheel...

i don't see how it will be drastically less reliable than a normal 300 whp dsm......

SPANISH-RICE;234169 wrote:
every problem a normal dsm has. a fun track car maybe. but a 600hp street dsm with twice as many things that can go wrong or an auto 600hp track dsm( which just sounds like a bucket of fail waiting to spill).

not everyone needs to agree with me, im not trying to change anyones mind here. i just think its terrible. cool engineering into it but thats about it. still a dsm, actually 2

[Afsil80]

bubba;234111 wrote:
twin boosted h22a awd del sol > this...

No, anything Del Sol always loses.

[91psiTSI]

Most of you guys on here dont know shit about dsm's so for you to sit here and talk shit is just stupid. Lets see how reliable a honda is at 600 hp. I have had my dsm for over 4 years now and the only real problem it has had is transmission issues and thats probably more my fault than anything. Nothing is reliable when you are making double or triple the hp your car should be.

[no_slow_clap]

91psiTSI;234244 wrote:
Most of you guys on here dont know shit about dsm's so for you to sit here and talk shit is just stupid. Lets see how reliable a honda is at 600 hp. I have had my dsm for over 4 years now and the only real problem it has had is transmission issues and thats probably more my fault than anything. Nothing is reliable when you are making double or triple the hp your car should be.

just what i have been trying to say.

the 4g63 is good for 450w on stock internals safely. besides the fact that it has been around for FOREVER.

just look at joes evo, close to 500 with stock head/bottom end. eventhough he doesnt drive it that often.