e36 m3

thrash

Also Jim, none of the E36's you posted were M3s, unless they did down-grade bumper swaps

Of course I agree with you that the E46 looks newer and nicer. My point was always and continues to be that if you care about the way the car feels and drives, that the E36 M3 is going to be superior to the non-M E46 cars. The E46 M3 will be faster but will cost much more to acquire and to maintain.

I apologize for suggesting people "ignore Jim's advice" as that is overly argumentative and presumably contributed to your defensive/derisive response.

I'd hope that you might be willing to concede some of the points I make. I don't know how much track experience you have in various BMWs. I'll assume that you have no DIY experience on multi-throttle BMW engines and the costs involved.

Parker

ive been looking into the e46 m3's as well for my next car... but i would rather have something awd.

thrash

An Audi B6 or B7 S4 (2002ish -> present) might be worth considering. It's a 340hp V8, manual gearbox available, more rear leg room than the E46 M3, and of course, AWD.

The E46 is a faster car, but the S4 is "adequate", AWD, and a more practical daily driver.

I was surprised at how affordable they have become.

Parker

thrash;256863 wrote:
An Audi B6 or B7 S4 (2002ish -> present) might be worth considering. It's a 340hp V8, manual gearbox available, more rear leg room than the E46 M3, and of course, AWD.

The E46 is a faster car, but the S4 is "adequate", AWD, and a more practical daily driver.

I was surprised at how affordable they have become.
haha.... im looking at one right now....

Jim

thrash;256860 wrote:
Also Jim, none of the E36's you posted were M3s, unless they did down-grade bumper swaps

Of course I agree with you that the E46 looks newer and nicer. My point was always and continues to be that if you care about the way the car feels and drives, that the E36 M3 is going to be superior to the non-M E46 cars. The E46 M3 will be faster but will cost much more to acquire and to maintain.

I apologize for suggesting people "ignore Jim's advice" as that is overly argumentative and presumably contributed to your defensive/derisive response.

I'd hope that you might be willing to concede some of the points I make. I don't know how much track experience you have in various BMWs. I'll assume that you have no DIY experience on multi-throttle BMW engines and the costs involved.

Thrash, I'm just giving you shit... I posted dirty lookin pictures of E36 compared to what I see as some of the cleanest E46's

Jim

There are quite a few E46 M3's that are in nice condition for under 20k now... Especially since the E9x series has been around...

There's no doubt about it, if you want to track the car, E36 is going to be much cheaper and way more accessible then an E46...

But for street driving, with the added factor of comfort / luxury the E46 is def. the way to go.

thrash;256857 wrote:
Out of the box, the E36 M3 is faster than any non-M E46. Including the ZHP. Faster in a straight line, faster around the track.

I'm not knocking the E46 and especially not the ZHP. Between an M car and a non-M car, it's just a different experience.

Are there any E46 M3s you'd actually want to buy under 20k? If not, they're at least twice as expensive as an E36.

There has always been a difference in the M and non-M versions of the cars. A sport model E46, even with ZHP, isn't going to give you the same driving experience as the E36 M3.

Obviously the E46 M3 is going to be faster than any of these, but you're going to pay for it. And maintenance IS going to cost more than the E36.

There's a good reason the E36 M3 is one of the most tracked cars in the US (tracked as in "taken to the race track"). It's really the sweet spot in a lot of ways.

I guess all I can say is to drive a few different cars and see what you like.

If I were going to go to the track a lot, there'd be no question -- I'd get an E36 M3. If i wanted the extra 93hp the US model is missing vs the E46, I could get it for less than the cost difference of getting an E46. And I'd start out 400 lbs lighter, with a better developed aftermarket, and where wheels, tires, brakes, and everything else is cheaper.

(actually, I bought an E30 325is and gutted it to go to the track, because that's another factor of 10 cheaper, and track cars should be cheap because they get hurt)

thrash;256860 wrote:
Also Jim, none of the E36's you posted were M3s, unless they did down-grade bumper swaps

Of course I agree with you that the E46 looks newer and nicer. My point was always and continues to be that if you care about the way the car feels and drives, that the E36 M3 is going to be superior to the non-M E46 cars. The E46 M3 will be faster but will cost much more to acquire and to maintain.

I apologize for suggesting people "ignore Jim's advice" as that is overly argumentative and presumably contributed to your defensive/derisive response.

I'd hope that you might be willing to concede some of the points I make. I don't know how much track experience you have in various BMWs. I'll assume that you have no DIY experience on multi-throttle BMW engines and the costs involved.

Thras, I'm just messing around 99% of the time on the internet... don't worry about offending me.

beachbum_jon

wow. thanks for all the informative replys!.

i think what i am going to do is if i end up getting a bimmer, its going to be a m3 for sure, and i think for now i will get a e36, just because this is my first bimmer and i want to have something to copare to if/when i do upgrade to a e46. the car will prolly never see a race track, maybe a drag strip once or a auto-x once, but thats it. mostly just a dd.

but i am seriously considering that silver e46 in that link that i posted, its here in phoenix!

kktvr4

Go drive both man, you are not gonna wanna buy a E36 after you've been in a E46.

bubba

Jim;256838 wrote:
By the way:

E46:

vs.

Yes. Please ignore my advice.

Here's an idea, post nice clean modded E36 M3 coupes (like how you did with the E46), instead of dirty and ratty ones that aren't even M3s... It would make things a little nicer to compare...

IMO E30 M3 > E36 M3 > E46 M3... especially in looks

SPANISH-RICE

That first m3 that jim posted is pure sex. I cant believe it

PSiedTSi

bubba;256893 wrote:
Here's an idea, post nice clean modded E36 M3 coupes (like how you did with the E46), instead of dirty and ratty ones that aren't even M3s... It would make things a little nicer to compare...

Wow, are you serious?

bubba

PSiedTSi;256899 wrote:
Wow, are you serious?

well why not, it's a little better to compare 2 cars on the same level than a shitty version compared to a good one...

bubba

E36

legacy image

Jim

SPANISH-RICE;256894 wrote:
That first m3 that jim posted is pure sex. I cant believe it

legacy image

Jim

Bubba are you serious?

E46 > E36

SPANISH-RICE

jim;256912 wrote:
bubba are you serious?

E46 > e36

ugh ugh, drool

kktvr4

A clean E36 M3 with fairly high miles will run about $14000.

A clean E46 M3 with fairly high miles will run about $17000.

Which one would you choose?

SPANISH-RICE

kktvr4;256918 wrote:
a clean e36 m3 with fairly high miles will run about $14000.

A clean e46 m3 with fairly high miles will run about $17000.

Which one would you choose?

thats pretty obvious for me at least. I really dislike the body style of the e36