Not your ordinary ricer car
-
he just told you the kit comes with fuel management...
-
YellowEvo wrote:
well nick said he'd beat me with just a TT kit so you lose try againYou are fuckin pathetic.....
-
T ! N wrote:
Anyways...back to the main topic.........
The graph above demonstrates the horsepower at the wheels
measured on an inertia type dyno which is the general industry
standard for power measurement in the US. The US specification
350Z used for this test was run with the following configuration:* APS 350Z Twin Turbo High Output System * APS Test Pipes * APS High Output Cat Back Exhaust System * Premium 94 (R+M)/2 fuel * 9.2 psi Turbocharger Pressure - (Turbocharger pressure for development/test data only - couldn't help bumping up the boost ;-) - 8 psi production target)Standing 1/4 Mile - 11.97 sec @ 116 mph (preliminary testing - US
Specification APS Development Vehicle)Sources: airpowersystems.com and my350z.com
It doesn't really matter you guys. Here's the thing, without an incredible driver, you're never going to achieve the results that are posted by companies. I was talking with a few of you on AIM the other day about this.
Now about this dyno graph, you can see they were running more boost then a normal person would for daily driving ... they even made a comment about that. That Twin Turbo kit includes a BUNCH of stuff... either way, I think the evo would have a good race for it... if it does beat it, so be it... he's got about 4x invested in to mods then the evo does.
Those TT kits for the 350z are NOT cheap, we're talking about 5000-6000 WITHOUT a FMIC. Regardless of the driving skill the evo would kill it on the launch anyway....
Both are cool cars. Anybody watch the Top Gear review of the 350z? hehehe...
-
Tony from Norwood Autocraft did a pimp twin setup on a customer car back when he worked at Jotech. 8 psi it did near 500 whp on a stock block. Over a 12k dollar setup from what I remember reading however. It's all about what you want to spend.
-
show me a vid. thanks!
-
close to a tt z running 12's huh nick. lmfao!!
-
Jim wrote:
It doesn't really matter you guys. Here's the thing, without an incredible driver, you're never going to achieve the results that are posted by companies. I was talking with a few of you on AIM the other day about this.Now about this dyno graph, you can see they were running more boost then a normal person would for daily driving ... they even made a comment about that. That Twin Turbo kit includes a BUNCH of stuff... either way, I think the evo would have a good race for it... if it does beat it, so be it... he's got about 4x invested in to mods then the evo does.
Those TT kits for the 350z are NOT cheap, we're talking about 5000-6000 WITHOUT a FMIC. Regardless of the driving skill the evo would kill it on the launch anyway....
Both are cool cars. Anybody watch the Top Gear review of the 350z? hehehe...
9.2 PSI is a mediocre 1.2 PSI increase. The general rule of thumb is each pound of boost you add will make the same amount of horsepower equal to your compression ratio. It will have made less than 10 horses upping it that high. And besides, most people increase their boost during a track day run anyways.
*All * (competent) turbo kits include engine management and extra fuel delivery devices. Being able to make that kind of power without an intercooler opens up the potential of even more power. I wouldn't exactly count the Z out at a launch; although it doesn't have AWD, it does have a considerable amount of torque over a 4g63.
It could probably do it.
Back to the original post... that Z is hideous.
2005 Mercedes-Benz C240 4Matic
1993 Mazda Rx-7 Twin Turbo (sold)
-
what are you serious? anything with a turbo would own us joe-Nick and Chris.
-
Oh and Tin, let's atleast see a pic or 2 of the Z. just for shits.
-
nicks a crab ass. no loving from me till he changes his rag.
-
YellowEvo wrote:
tell your brother to put one in, you drive it then tin, and we'll see who wins k? solves it, it's like penny cash for your bro anywaysFirst of all I didn't offer a race did I? I just wanted to prove how stupid and retarded kirk is. He should keep his mouth shut if he can barely recognizes the difference between a blow off valve and a wastegate. Second, my brother has the money, but he's not going to put $8,000 down just to fuck around with a 18/19 year old kid who's mowing lawns for living. He has better things to do......
BTW I posted those pictures, because Jim mentioned it to me a while back.
-
AcesHigh wrote:
9.2 PSI is a mediocre 1.2 PSI increase. The general rule of thumb is each pound of boost you add will make the same amount of horsepower equal to your compression ratio. It will have made less than 10 horses upping it that high. And besides, most people increase their boost during a track day run anyways.*All * (competent) turbo kits include engine management and extra fuel delivery devices. Being able to make that kind of power without an intercooler opens up the potential of even more power. I wouldn't exactly count the Z out at a launch; although it doesn't have AWD, it does have a considerable amount of torque over a 4g63.
It could probably do it.
Back to the original post... that Z is hideous.
What im saying is that power isn't going to be made by the average joe blow who straps on a TT kit to his z. Also, that kit was intercooled....
I'd put $100 on the Evo killing it on the launch.
-
so...why are we talking about tt z's when tins bro wont even do it. tony from frozen and dairy said his z could take your brothers, tin.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login