Ok
-
dubbsy wrote:
you suck
It's a good thing you can't see what we write about you in the protected forums....:D -
tjamz wrote:
You know what, I am going to take the optimistic approach this time around. I am hoping that Bush will realize that some mistakes were made and will work towards correcting them. Now that the election is over, he has nothing to lose by admitting to them. Perhaps he will try and involve the international community a little more in the rebuilding of Iraq. Hopefully both sides can put aside political issues and work together to do what is best for our country. We, the voters, deserve that much. Even though this may sound like a flip-flop, I still have hope for Bush. He is my president, and I will stand behind his decisions (even if I don't fully support them) and trust that he is leading the country the best he can. Like John Kerry said, it's time for the healing to begin, it's time to find the common ground that all seemed to be forgotten during the election. It's time to do what is best for this country regardless of what our political allies might think. Basically it's time for America to start kicking a little more ass! To do this, we will need the help of other nations. While I think that removing Sadom (borrowing the spelling from DaveH) from power was a good thing, I think it would go a long way towards winning the peace by inviting more countries to help with the rebuild, if for no other reason so that the insurgents will see that this is truly a world wide effort to HELP their country, rather than a gung-ho US military invasion of their country. IF we can pull this off, we will undoubtedly be restored to our prestige that we once had. If we fail in Iraq we only invite more failure. It's time to rekindle old allies and work towards a common goal of worldwide freedom and peace. It won't be easy, but nothing that is worth it ever is. I just hope that everyone in Washington will share my views and concerns.
I must say, you are by far the most mature non-Bush supporter on this site. I have a lot of respect for that. I also agree with what you have to say. I hope some Liberals can follow your lead. We do need more international support. The question is how do we get that support from other countries? Any ideas? -
HandoEX wrote:
I must say, you are by far the most mature non-Bush supporter on this site. I have a lot of respect for that. I also agree with what you have to say. I hope some Liberals can follow your lead. We do need more international support. The question is how do we get that support from other countries? Any ideas?
We need to be honest with them. Tell them we need their help and that we acknowledge we should have had it going in. We need to own up to our mistakes, but stand by our successes. We need to let them know that they are welcome in the rebuilding process, that they are allowed to bid on contracts, that they are needed to help stabilize the region. One or two countries alone cannot stabilize the Arab region. It will take a concerted effort. We need to start being a little more strict w/ Israel too, I'm not saying lose them as a partner, but let them know that firing missles into a crowd of civilians will result in sanctions. We have too many double standards with countries. We need to strengthen our ties w/ other middle-eastern countries (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, India) so that they may help in the peace process. Right now too many Iraqis see the US "liberation" as nothing more than a holy war, the Western Christian country is invading their homeland in an effort to spread Western culture. We need them to know that we respect their culture and that we don't intend to change the cultures that exist in their homeland, we just want to offer them a chance at freedom from oppression, freedom to not live in fear of their dictator. This will take time, but for America to regain its prestige we must prevail. We must do what is necessary to ensure that our efforts were for the good of all. That is how you end terrorism. -
For all the Bush-Haters; look at the Optimistic Side.. It's his 2nd term so it's a for sure only 4 more years.... Unless we get a Jeb Bush.. Now I was think'n how crazy this would be.. Hilary Clinton and Vp runner John Edwards against Jeb Clinton and some other dude maybe let's say Arnold Swarchenager or something; how weird would that be.. HAHA; either way your getting a clinton or a bush back in office.. I just thought that would be kinda comical.
-
that would be funny...but won't happen. I don't think hillary will get the dem nomination, though I know she'll run. I don't think Jeb will run...ever. I know a lot of people are leaning that way now, but I just don't think he'll do it. Kinda like we'll never have another Kennedy run.
-
HandoEX wrote:
I must say, you are by far the most mature non-Bush supporter on this site. I have a lot of respect for that. I also agree with what you have to say. I hope some Liberals can follow your lead. We do need more international support. The question is how do we get that support from other countries? Any ideas?He switched my vote.....
-
blue srt-4, whose jeb clinton?
-
99slowGSX wrote:
He switched my vote.....
Seriously? I thought you were just playing along. Cool though.Its not necessary that I think Bush had done the wrong things, I just think Kerry would have done them better is all. It's just my opinion, just like its many peoples opinion that he would have done a worse job. We'll never know. IMHO Kerry's plan and my plan for dealing w/ the middle-east aren't that different, I just think I present my plan better
, now if I could only persuade the President the way I persuaded Brian...... -
BumpinJCC wrote:
wow that is a sad sad sad looking man throwing that football..got me there. bush has a better arm.
Yeah, but Bush is REALLY good at using pom-poms...he was a cheerleader @ Yale afterall. -
We gotta rep. in the senate, thanks to the help of Walter "The Fossill" Mondale taking over for Paul Wellstone(RIP).
-
I think most repubs would agree that Dorgan, Pomeroy and Conrad are fairly conservative democrats (especially by the current standards) and I think North Dakotans are smart enough to realize that having seniority helps an awful lot. Having someone on the Ways & Means committee is about the top spot you could ever hope your representative could ever achieve. Here is an interesting tidbit, the last time the state had a population growth was when a democrat was governor (Sinner). I'd actually like to see term limits on all House & Senate members nationwide, it would bring in new ideas and really freshen things up. Maybe 3 terms maximum then you'd have to sit out for 2 terms before you could reenter the race.
-
My NOva wrote:
how many years has it been with more dems then rep. in the senate what is it 70 30?
wtf?? You know anything?? Reps have more Dems by a margin of i think 53-46-1.Republicans own all 3 branches of the Gov't: Congress, Senate and Presidancy.
-
bluesrt4 wrote:
For all the Bush-Haters; look at the Optimistic Side.. It's his 2nd term so it's a for sure only 4 more years.... Unless we get a Jeb Bush.. Now I was think'n how crazy this would be.. Hilary Clinton and Vp runner John Edwards against Jeb Clinton and some other dude maybe let's say Arnold Swarchenager or something; how weird would that be.. HAHA; either way your getting a clinton or a bush back in office.. I just thought that would be kinda comical.I thought Arnold can't run for VP since he wasn't born in America?
-
He can't..
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login