Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. The Parking Lot
  4. Freedom of speech should have some sort of limit, don'tcha think?

Freedom of speech should have some sort of limit, don'tcha think?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Parking Lot
30 Posts 15 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DaveHD Offline
    DaveHD Offline
    DaveH
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    StangerBanger96, you need more shit in your sig file.

    :icon_rr:

    DaveH
    '94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph

    legacy image

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • StangerBanger96S Offline
      StangerBanger96S Offline
      StangerBanger96
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      DaveH wrote:
      StangerBanger96, you need more shit in your sig file.

      :icon_rr:
      I usually add more on Tuesdays and Thursdays when im @ work for 6 hours straight and have nothing to do after the first 30 minutes of work 😄

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? This user is from outside of this forum
        ? This user is from outside of this forum
        Guest
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        StangerBanger96 wrote:
        Like Ami and Tjamz already pointed out, only Congress can't limit speech. State governments that don't have some freedom of speech clause in their state constitutions/bill of rights can pass any restriction on speech they please, as well as private institutions and such. Freedom of speech doesn't exist the way people make it out to exist.

        Not true. That would be like saying that states can say they won't let women vote, or that their citizens cannot own guns, or that there can only be state run newspapers. Or even that ND could say, ok, from this point forward the only recognized religion is Hindu, anyone found to be following a different faith shall be tried on treason charges.

        Sorry StangerBanger, you are wrong on your assumption above.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 24valvenotak2 Offline
          24valvenotak2 Offline
          24valvenotak
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Turbo5Oh wrote:
          i take offese to that comment. by you as a white person saying u are gonna "go beat the wife and kids" racial profiles all whites as wife and kids beaters
          i have consulted my lawyer and we are sueing u and ur group of "veritas" wife and kid beaters

          im gonna be rich!!!

          im indian, havent you white devils done enough to me already?

          and wes, your right, nothing makes you feel more like a man then beating your wife and children after a long hard day at the office.

          Getcher green hat, we are goin fishin.

          > 63vette;288530 wrote:
          > I dont know shit about building cars.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • StangerBanger96S Offline
            StangerBanger96S Offline
            StangerBanger96
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            tjamz wrote:
            Not true. That would be like saying that states can say they won't let women vote, or that their citizens cannot own guns, or that there can only be state run newspapers. Or even that ND could say, ok, from this point forward the only recognized religion is Hindu, anyone found to be following a different faith shall be tried on treason charges.

            Sorry StangerBanger, you are wrong on your assumption above.

            No actually what I said is true Chuck. All the things you just listed are covered under separate portions of the Constitution regarding the fact that the Federal Government has supremacy over the States in cases that come down to state vs. federal. We talked about this several times in Govn't class.

            It's also obvious that there is a certain amount of state control over issues like gun control and such. Some states require extensive background checks and holding periods to purchase guns, some don't, some have no CC laws and others hand out CC permits to anyone without a criminal record. States have to follow certain rules to remain a State and in doing so have to follow regulations put forth by the Federal government, but otherwise they COULD, restrict speech. Most, if not all (i'd assume), have state constitutions/bills of rights that cover freedom of speech though, and obviously renders this argument between me and you useless. Alls I was trying to say is that the 1st Amendment and really everything in the Bill of Rights, applies to the Federal government. I could ask my gov teacher to give me a more detailed explanation as he used to be a lawyer/lobbiest for several years and knows the laws and such like the back of his hand. I do know we covered this topic fairly in depth in class though, I just am probably leaving out some small but important details.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 925JL9259 Offline
              925JL9259 Offline
              925JL925
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              What a dick. They still shouldnt get any money though.

              95 TSI

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? This user is from outside of this forum
                ? This user is from outside of this forum
                Guest
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Summary of link provided below:

                The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “Congress
                shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press....” This
                language restricts government both more and less than it would if it were applied
                literally. It restricts government more in that it applies not only to Congress, but to
                all branches of the federal government, and to all branches of state and local
                government. It restricts government less in that it provides no protection to some
                types of speech and only limited protection to others.

                This report provides an overview of the major exceptions to the First
                Amendment — of the ways that the Supreme Court has interpreted the guarantee of
                freedom of speech and press to provide no protection or only limited protection for
                some types of speech. For example, the Court has decided that the First Amendment
                provides no protection to obscenity, child pornography, or speech that constitutes
                “advocacy of the use of force or of law violation ... where such advocacy is directed
                to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce
                such action.”

                The Court has also decided that the First Amendment provides less than full
                protection to commercial speech, defamation (libel and slander), speech that may be
                harmful to children, speech broadcast on radio and television, and public employees’
                speech. Even speech that enjoys the most extensive First Amendment protection may
                be subject to “regulations of the time, place, and manner of expression which are
                content-neutral, are narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and
                leave open ample alternative channels of communication.” And, even speech that
                enjoys the most extensive First Amendment protection may be restricted on the basis
                of its content if the restriction passes “strict scrutiny,” i.e., if the government shows
                that the restriction serves “to promote a compelling interest” and is “the least
                restrictive means to further the articulated interest.”

                http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/95-815.pdf

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? This user is from outside of this forum
                  ? This user is from outside of this forum
                  Guest
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  drama :rolleyes:

                  If you go see a live comic be prepared to get walked on. Maybe I should go and do the same thing sue comics for making a living. :rolleyes:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • BookemB Offline
                    BookemB Offline
                    Bookem
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Yeah try sitting in the front row of Courtney's comedy club in Moorhead, bet there's a bit of name calling

                    Legacy GT
                    Gmc Suburban

                    I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You keep the change.

                    Danny: What about Fargostreet?
                    Hallorann: Fargostreet?
                    Danny: You're scared of Fargostreet, ain't ya?
                    Hallorann: No, I ain't.
                    Danny: Mr. Hallorann. What's in Fargostreet?
                    Hallorann: Nothin'! There ain't nothin' in Fargostreet. But you ain't got no business goin' in there anyway. So stay out! You understand? Stay out!

                    ɥƃnouǝ ǝɯ ʇɥƃnɐʇ ǝʌɐɥ ʎǝɥʇ ʞuıɥʇ ʇuop ı ƃuıɥʇ ɹǝʇndɯoɔ sıɥʇ ʇǝƃ ʇuop ı

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? This user is from outside of this forum
                      ? This user is from outside of this forum
                      Guest
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Bookem wrote:
                      Yeah try sitting in the front row of Courtney's comedy club in Moorhead, bet there's a bit of name calling

                      Try getting on stage when the sandman is there......LOTS of humiliating antics take place.....trust me

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups