Slova and Slowcus Got Worked!
-
My NOva wrote:
jesus does any read my posts or do they look at the name? Ive said Ive learend my place till next spring. why dont u tell every body what happend to the lude? and If u dont then shut the fuck up :mad:
thats it next time i see u ur going down :mad: -
My NOva wrote:
told u to shut the fuck up :mad: and stop talking shit or it comes out
im going to knock u the fuck out :mad: -
btleier wrote:
this has gotten worthless... ever notice how it always come down to the same few people bitching and moaning... no matter what the thread starts about....LOCK ME
good point devin just has to stick his big nose in all time and try to slam me and im getting tierd of it -
My NOva wrote:
good point devin just has to stick his big nose in all time and try to slam me and im getting tierd of it
u just keep posting about every little thing on earth mayb u should chill out on posting for a while -
wow, after reading this thread I realized I know alot about cars. Btw, Jim what did your car trap at on the 14.2, I thought you said 103 or 106 when I first met you.
It takes years to get a real good understanding on how cars work and performance. So devin quit rippin on My Nova, b/c you just asked if slicks reduce engine torque.
-
Well, heres the thing. The first time that I went to the track, my turbo was in good condition, but I didn't have anything but 14" rims + really worn out tires, so I couldn't do anything but spin. I was trapping i think it was 104mph.
Then after an entire summer of racing, I was able to burrow nick tufte's old worn out drag radials and get some traction, at which point I had my best 1/4 mile time, but my lowest trap speed.
Does that make sense? My turbo wasn't as good as when I first started and got my best trap speed, but I got my best time b/c I got traction.
Jim
-
Yeah it does actually. The 14" rims+tires where probably lighter and smaller diameter than the slicks. The 60' advantage the slicks provide become a hinderance at higher speeds because of the affect on gearing due to wider diameter.
-
guest wrote:
wow, after reading this thread I realized I know alot about cars. Btw, Jim what did your car trap at on the 14.2, I thought you said 103 or 106 when I first met you.It takes years to get a real good understanding on how cars work and performance. So devin quit rippin on My Nova, b/c you just asked if slicks reduce engine torque.
i dont understate what ur saying when did i ask if slick reduces torque?hmmmm...
i said that i have a exhuast leak and if that is y i have no low end torque... -
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login