New S2000
-
SPANISH-RICE;225790 wrote:
do you even know what vtec does? sounds like you dont.HA, of course i know what vtec does, and i would even say that i know a whole shitload more about what it does, how it works and its effects on engine dynamics than you do. So dont question me on valvetrain theory, ive studied it for a years. I am also willing to bet that your definition of what vtec does is exactly 180* off of what mine is, like a half full/half empty type of thing. The fact is it takes a nice big fat cam and says "nope, im gonna be a faggoty ass little cam for 75% of the time" hence de-tuning the car for all intents and purposes. Maybe you should go find something to do instead of sitting on FS whoring threads all day, id swear you were bubba.
And i was referring to the power aspect, no fucking shit s2000 is RWD, its one of only 2 cars honda ever got right
-
Grr;225844 wrote:
HA, of course i know what vtec does, and i would even say that i know a whole shitload more about what it does, how it works and its effects on engine dynamics than you do. So dont question me on valvetrain theory, ive studied it for a years. I am also willing to bet that your definition of what vtec does is exactly 180* off of what mine is, like a half full/half empty type of thing. The fact is it takes a nice big fat cam and says "nope, im gonna be a faggoty ass little cam for 75% of the time" hence de-tuning the car for all intents and purposes. Maybe you should go find something to do instead of sitting on FS whoring threads all day, id swear you were bubba.And i was referring to the power aspect, no fucking shit s2000 is RWD, its one of only 2 cars honda ever got right
Honda got a car right? What???
-
it uses the small cam so it can actually MAKE power down low and then switches to the high cam because the small cam isnt efficeint at higher rpms. it does not DE-tune it, with higher revving motors its impossible to have a cam thats efficient for both gas efficiency and power. engage vtec all the time and watch that " fat " cam try and run it at low R's. it fucking fails.
and why would i find somethign else to do all day? i love it here
here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2- 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
-
It does not fail by any means. For some people half the reason they build a motor is so they can have that sweet lope at idle, and with injection it is so easy to make it run at low rpm. Seems to me people have been doing it successfully since the flathead V8, but what would i know
BTW you do realize you have over 200 posts in 7 days? That is so pathetic its unreal, maybe get a job or something?
-
FS is my job homes. and seriously, engage vtec and try and drive a car in town at low R's it WILL run like shit. it wont just "lope" at idle. its for driveability/power
here a psht, there psht, everywhere a psht psht
PVC SQUAD MEMBER #2- 95 CIVIC EX- DD 320whp on a mustang dyno
-
SPANISH-RICE;225860 wrote:
it uses the small cam so it can actually MAKE power down low and then switches to the high cam because the small cam isnt efficeint at higher rpms.Gary you forgot something.....
those motors need the extra 10hp/10lb-ft on the bottom half of the rev range to even get a 2,000lb car up to normal speed...............
i am probably stretching it with the 10 lb-ft figure..... as that would be near 10% of the engines peak TO..............:icon_puke_r:
something worth a shit can suffice what gains are to be had with such a complex/uneeded system such as VTeck YO....
........as something worth a shit is not taxed to make enough TO to make a car pleasant/easy to drive on the street
-
I love the gas milage, thats all i care about.
-
Grr;225844 wrote:
HA, of course i know what vtec does, and i would even say that i know a whole shitload more about what it does, how it works and its effects on engine dynamics than you do. So dont question me on valvetrain theory, ive studied it for a years. I am also willing to bet that your definition of what vtec does is exactly 180* off of what mine is, like a half full/half empty type of thing. The fact is it takes a nice big fat cam and says "nope, im gonna be a faggoty ass little cam for 75% of the time" hence de-tuning the car for all intents and purposes. Maybe you should go find something to do instead of sitting on FS whoring threads all day, id swear you were bubba.And i was referring to the power aspect, no fucking shit s2000 is RWD, its one of only 2 cars honda ever got right
Umm... i can think of twice that many that honda made rwd....
S600, S2000, NSX, Beat...
-
Grr;226076 wrote:
no, there are only 2 cars honda got right, the S2000 and the NSX. The rest were nothing to write home aboutwell its great to know you have an oppinion.
i like it
-
-
Spec_R;226169 wrote:
damn, can't you all get along for once? So much dramas here...For the past 8 years there have been a lot of rumors about newer generation of the S2000, is this official facts from Honda? I don't think so.. It's just a rumor like the rest of them..
Just like the new crx... been rumors ever since they quit production on the del sol... but now i guess they're getting closer to making it, unfortunately, cuz its ugly and most likely only available in hybrid, like the insight...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login