Coyote rifle finished.
-
Looks nice. My coyote killer is ready to go as well... with two more in the works HAHA.
-
You need to mix up some tannerite and go out and practice........explosive fun.
-
Bookem;265761 wrote:
3 round burst that biotch and waste some rounds. I beleive most parts are the same for an a4.
http://www.sarcoinc.com/m16.htmlAnd go to the pen for upwards of 10 years.. sounds like it's so worth it... Having an AR-15 and having the parts to make it full auto/3 rd burst, even if they aren't installed is still considered the same thing as having a machine gun, i.e. without the proper paperwork, ur doing an assload of time
KA-T_240;265794 wrote:
I am waiting for pics of bubba's coyote gun.Won't be up for a while, I'm not heading back to the shop for a few weeks, but i'll give a little discription...
Colt 6700 Competition H-bar (pre-1994 ban), bipod, sling, currently with night vision scope.
Remington 700 VLS .223 (factory heavy barrel), bipod, and either a 6-24x or 10-40x scope on it.
DPMS AR-15 in .204 ruger, stock but we have a ton of scopes in stock...
And if all else fails... Remington 700 in .300 win mag, heavy barrel, target stock, bipod, 10-40x scope (needs to be re drilled and tapped, since the previous owner fucked it up)
Got a whole bunch of other things, but these are the main good varmit ones
ichibankilla;265800 wrote:
You need to mix up some tannerite and go out and practice........explosive fun.We have a huge case of this for sale in our gun shop... shit is so much fun...
-
I want a sweet varmit gun

-
LMK
-
SPANISH-RICE;266209 wrote:
LMKtell me what u want for one... there's a lot of different choices..
I suggest a Colt AR-15... we have 2 pre-1994 ban ones (they still have the flash suppressor) one was at like $1325, and idk bout the other, maybe a little less...
-
Pre-ban doesn't matter any more as you can buy anything current and let it have a flash hider....
-
However the pre-bans are worth coin to people in CA, CT, where they have statewide "assault rifle" bans.
-
-
-
wtf do you have the optic up so high for?
-
bader hit it on the head. its level with the irons, well once i get the rear one here it will be. Hopefully absolute co-witnessed which means the dot is in the same plain as the irons. if not it will be 1/3 co-witnessed which means the irons are in the 1/3 bottom of the optic. and it is forward so i can have the rear iron mounted.
Im still debating on a fixed or flip up rear sight for it... I like the flip ups, but i love how ridged the fixed LMT sights are. And it wont matter as it ill be co-witnessed with the optic.
This is the next optic i wanna try when i have the money and the rest off the gun is finished... http://www.burrisoptics.com/ar332.html
-
have you had a chance to try an EOTech HWS?
I got a chance to play with one last week. Before actually looking through one mounted on a weapon, i didn't "get it". Now that I have, it makes sense. The target acquisition speed is really pretty impressive.. much better than even very high quality iron sights.
For a CQB rifle, i think an EOTech stlye optic is hard to beat. The rear sight should be a folder that you'd want to keep down when the EOTech was functional. The optic should be on a quick-disconnect mount as well. LaRue tactical sells what is probably the top-shelf setup.
I didn't like that turning the EOTech on/off was as finnicky as it was.. the model i used had the soft rubber buttons on the back of the unit.
With a conventional optic, I might mount it further to the rear. The Troy BUIS I'm familiar with in the down position lets you get a normal small optic like that very close to the back of the rail, especially if the optic is on a QD mount.
-
you dont need to have the optic on a quick mount if it is co-witnessed. you dont even need a flip up if it is done right. There is a lot of info concening this on ar15.com if it is co-witnessed properly and your optic dies, you look right through the optic with your irons... so there is no need to remove it.
Also i like the eotech but i hate how you can not seal the lens/view window from the weather. that is why i like the burris/aimpoint/tactedge style better.
-
even if you get a glass failure or the seal is compromised and the interior fogs or something? co-witnessing still requires the glass to pass images relatively distortion free, right?
I figured that the BUIS use case was something that prevented the optic from passing an image at all.. did I misunderstand?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login



