Brett Favre in Purple
-
he could sit on the bench for all i care. i'd still buy his vikings jersey just for the lulz.
-
Trafik Jamz;273443 wrote:
Wait...wasn't he washed up a couple years ago with Green Bay?ib4therestofthepurplepansybandwagongetsonboardwiththeirnextgleamofhope
opposed to who would give the Vikings a better chance to win? -
he proved he wasnt washed up when he played for the jets..if he were washed up he would have played for the lions or dolphins
-
24valvenotak;273454 wrote:
he proved he wasnt washed up when he played for the jets..if he were washed up he would have played for the lions or dolphinsno, he just went out there and padded the defensive stats. I had him on my fantasy team last year and he was always good for at least 2 interceptions a game.
-
He doesn't need to win any games, just not lose them.
-
GarageAlchemist;273485 wrote:
He doesn't need to win any games, just not lose them.Which is exactly what he can't do. He played really, really bad to close the season last year. The Jets went 1-4 in their last 5 games (and it was a miracle that the Jets won the one game against Buffalo) and I honestly blame most of it on Favre. He was just terrible at the end of last season and I think his play had a lot to do with the Jets crumbling.
With that said, I'd take him over TJack or Sage in a heartbeat. My biggest concern in bringing him in is making the same mistake that NY made in going away from the running game just because we have Brett Favre.
-
HandoEX;273488 wrote:
Which is exactly what he can't do. He played really, really bad to close the season last year. The Jets went 1-4 in their last 5 games (and it was a miracle that the Jets won the one game against Buffalo) and I honestly blame most of it on Favre. He was just terrible at the end of last season and I think his play had a lot to do with the Jets crumbling.With that said, I'd take him over TJack or Sage in a heartbeat. My biggest concern in bringing him in is making the same mistake that NY made in going away from the running game just because we have Brett Favre.
do you really see the vikings going away from the running game?
-
24valvenotak;273491 wrote:
do you really see the vikings going away from the running game?Best football take I've heard from you yet.
I think our boring offense will work in Favre's favor actually. He just needs to be a threat. He's never had a running game or defense like we've had. I think thats why he is such a "gunslinger". The decision making and the ability to check all of his reads will be the most beneficial. Numerous times last year there were plays "left on the field" by our QBs.
-
Having him around just to provide leadership to the young QBs is worth its weight in gold as well.
-
-
I'm just excited to have a QB with proven potential. He proved last year that he isn't in his prime, but I agree that he can't be worse than TJackson... Hopefully he is out to prove something this year, and get eliminate one of the biggest offensive issues the Vikings have had for years.
-
I still hope they go 0-16 so they can draft Tebow next year
-
lmfao.
not even going to waste my time
-
PSiedTSi;273546 wrote:
-1 rep for you, sir.A FB in our system is worthless.
Really? Really? Tony come on, you can't be that dense. He'll get drafted, as a QB and do just fine. He can read a defense better than Dirty Sanchez can.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login