watch this video, then discuss
-
Organized religion is a joke, what has it gotten us, wars, killing in the name of, abusing kids, creating hate & intolerance, etc....
I love people who say your life most suck to not have religion, its better than just following what you are told (by people like priests who abuse kids, or have started wars because someone had a different belief).
I'm not religious, but I've got beliefs.
-
SPANISH-RICE;279732 wrote:
Then where would that "someone" have come from?Exactly why I don't consider myself agnostic. I guess I am "atheist", because I'm not entirely sure what "higher power" there would even be, other than another intelligent civilization being the catalyst. I just personally think a lot is fueled simply by nature, which could be that higher power?
-
PSiedTSi;279759 wrote:
Exactly why I don't consider myself agnostic. I guess I am "atheist", because I'm not entirely sure what "higher power" there would even be, other than another intelligent civilization being the catalyst. I just personally think a lot is fueled simply by nature, which could be that higher power?You have such a stoner mentality....:)
-
inspector01;279758 wrote:
Organized religion is a joke, what has it gotten us, wars, killing in the name of, abusing kids, creating hate & intolerance, etc....I love people who say your life most suck to not have religion, its better than just following what you are told (by people like priests who abuse kids, or have started wars because someone had a different belief).
I'm not religious, but I've got beliefs.
My faith has nothing to do with a priest or a pastor. My faith come straight from the bible. My faith is dependent on my relationship with God. This is a relationship the depends on no one else.
I am sorry for the comment made to spanish rice about his life must suck. I didnt mean that.
Now in the old testament ones entrance into heaven was based on their faith in God and abiding by the ten commandments. The worlds sins became so bad that God sent his son (God in the flesh) to die for our sins to save us from eternal damnation, hence Jesus labeled as our Savior. So for the last 2000 years ones entrance into heaven is based on knowing that Jesus came to earth as flesh, died for humans sins, and he defeated death by rising on the third day.
the feeling of being saved is an experience once has to go through to understand and a joy that nothing else even compares too.
I agree with the statement about Alah and God being the same being. everyone has a different way of praising the same higher power.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
12.645@118mph 12.6psi
-
Regardless of religion. Who wants any more of those stinky bartards running around our country?!
-
SmitEvo;279760 wrote:
You have such a stoner mentality....:)
Lost on that one... 
fdfreak wrote:
the feeling of being saved is an experience once has to go through to understand and a joy that nothing else even compares too.I was born and raised as a church goer. I was confirmed in High School, but the only thing I really felt was that I wasted my time...
If God is real, why do I need to "confirm" that I believe in him? Is my word not good enough?
GoldyHatchPSI;279765 wrote:
Regardless of religion. Who wants any more of those stinky bartards running around our country?!There's the flaw in the video. Everyone hears "Islamic" and they think middle eastern people. Just because they are Islamic, doesn't mean they are middle eastern...
-
I know of a number of "islamic" people in Fargo who are much whiter than me.....
-
Trafik Jamz;279770 wrote:
I know of a number of "islamic" people in Fargo who are much whiter than me.....Yeah that was kinda my point...ANY race can be islamic...and most aren't "extremists" like the ones causing harm in the world. It's basically all hype, religion or not IMO. Atleast it urged us to fuck more, not kill the ones "overpopulating".
-
-
SmitEvo;279736 wrote:
Yep...old testament stuff. Better follow that to a T. Then the new testament came around and does not state all of those things. The new way for Christians is through Jesus.While I don't disagree with you that this is old testament, isn't it safe to say then the if the other "abominations" are to be thrown out and irrelevant then the homosexuality one should be as well?
I believe in intelligent design and a being that "I" refer to as God. I don't, however, believe that the bible is the literal word of God but rather a collection of stories/morals in which to live your life by. Most of my beliefs on that fly in the face of conventional Christianity....and while I may not believe every story of the Bible, I will say this....something spectacular happened about 2009 years ago that changed the world. The Christians see that time in history as the day our Savior gave his life for our sins....the Jews and Muslims see it as a time that a great prophet walked the Earth. I'm in the camp of the Christians on this one as there were many great prophets before Jesus, but ironically none really after.
Aside from intelligent design, I do believe that life is constantly evolving. It is well documented that the pinky finger has been slowly shrinking over the past few centuries...why? Because we don't need it as much any more as we used to and we are evolving in such a manner that (theoretically) some day we will no longer have a pinky.
I'd also theorize that skin color is a result of evolution. Darker skinned people have origins closer to the equator whereas lighter skinned people tend to be from cooler climates.
To discount evolution is as foolish as discounting intelligent design. In my opinion the two work together not against each other....heck even Pope John Paul II agreed that evolution is beyond theory.
I don't necessarily think that we all evolved from a single organism however.
Cliff Notes on what Chuck believes:
There is a "God"
The bible is a great reference manual on how to live your life, but the stories should not necessarily be taken literally
Evolution co-exists with God
We didn't come from monkeys -
D S ohM;279781 wrote:
as logical as believing that people can actually travel back in time.But it theoretically is possible.
-
There is a much higher correlation with family size and poverty than there is with family size and religion.
Many of us are no farther than 2-3 generations away from a family that had 7+ kids. But 99% of us are much richer at our age than our great grandparents were at their wealthiest. We're stastically going to have very small families.
To the extent that socioeconomic position is not stratified in America (and it isn't... we crush every other society on earth in terms of upward mobility potential), the machine of the American economy will tend to get rid of the birth-size advantage of poor immigrant populations, be they "ethnic Muslim" or be they mexicans.
In much of europe there is extremely poor economic mobility for individuals and organizations. I think the extent to which a refugee group remains in the same socioeconomic tranche in France is much more pronounced than it is in the US, primarily due to the repressive work environment in France and the very strong nationalist/monocoltural slant of the native French population.
Neither situation exsts in the US to a comparable degree.
Now, I expect both of those to get worse -- the tightening economic controls int he US are going to end up hurting the newest immigrants. And as native-borns see this influx of new different-looking people, in a down economy excaberated by stupid economic decisions that make it worse in a vicious cycle, nationalist and exclusionary sentiment will probably intensify.
-
Side note on Islam:
Muhummed had a 9 year old wife. The early spread of islam happened under the sword. There is an islamic model for world government (the caliphate), and there IS a mandate to engage in violent warfare with non-Islamic people. the best case for non-muslims in a muslim-ruled nation is to be 2nd class citizens who are tolerated but do not have full legal rights.
While many people are fond of playing the "moral equivalence card", it's usually done poorly. There is no plan for a Christian world government. The Bible was translated (by hand) into more languages faster and wider than any other text in the history of human writing. Christianity, the written bible, and the early church all sprang up in secret, in occupied Roman territory. Not only did Christianity not require the coercive power of the Roman Military to spread far and wide; it did so inspite of this.
Certainly there have been all kinds of killings and conquests done nominally in the name of Christianity, but you'll note that there is no biblical plan for conqest, for empire, and there is no description of how Jesus will rule the earthly kingdom (other than "it will be awesome"), and there is no record of Jesus killing anyone or demanding a conversion.
So the point i am making is that to the extent that Islam spreads via violence and state sponsorship, it is doctrinal. To the extent that Christianity has done so, it is heretical or at best non-doctrinal.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login