Hello
-
wow there is a lot of people from PR thats cool...it isn't the H.O. and yes people have and still do tune these things...they have moved more into the 99+ with the 3400 V6 however there is a few mid 90's that are fairly nice machines....run over to http://www.gaownersclub.com/forum/index.php and check it out....theres a guy with a supercharged 95 running high 14s at 90mph...sure its not mind numbing speed but thats preaty quick compaired to mine...lol
-
Welcome!
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall
Torque is how far you take the wall with you -
CheapSRT;293959 wrote:
welcome!!! if you want to build a diesel wjen your done with school build a cummins in my opinionWhy.... let him spend $$$ on an Izuzu engine, when he would have to spend a percentage of that on a cummins for the same amount of power and still be more reliable...
I think this amazing pic tells enough of the story.... wouldn't you say??
even though i admit I would take a Dmax over a PSD...... the PSD looks ridiculous..... like gasser parts in a diesel
-
That right there shows why all other diesels blow donkey dick.
-
Welcome, it wasn't just the gaskets that were problematic but the entire cylinder head, by far the one head I sell the most.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
zbrown;293986 wrote:
Why.... let him spend $$$ on an Izuzu engine, when he would have to spend a percentage of that on a cummins for the same amount of power and still be more reliable...I think this amazing pic tells enough of the story.... wouldn't you say??
even though i admit I would take a Dmax over a PSD...... the PSD looks ridiculous..... like gasser parts in a diesel
Just to be fair the Duramax spreads the stress over eight rods instead of the Cummins six:icon_rr:. I'd still pick a Cummins though.
-
To play devils advocate: any extra strength in the rotating parts is extra design cost, extra manufacturing cost, and if it comes via extra mass, then also extra power wasted, and extra fuel used.
Of course, having 10% too much durability is better than having 10% too little
I thought all diesel engines were toys until you are talking about Caterpillar?
-
zbrown;293986 wrote:
Why.... let him spend $$$ on an Izuzu engine, when he would have to spend a percentage of that on a cummins for the same amount of power and still be more reliable...I think this amazing pic tells enough of the story.... wouldn't you say??
even though i admit I would take a Dmax over a PSD...... the PSD looks ridiculous..... like gasser parts in a diesel
You mean the dmax looks like a gasser? /the PSD has the beefiest rods.
-
thrash;293997 wrote:
To play devils advocate: any extra strength in the rotating parts is extra design cost, extra manufacturing cost, and if it comes via extra mass, then also extra power wasted, and extra fuel used.Of course, having 10% too much durability is better than having 10% too little
I thought all diesel engines were toys until you are talking about Caterpillar?
Considering the orginal 12 valve 5.9 B series used in the 1st and half of the 2nd gen dodges is an industrial engine....... hell the same 5.9 B series is used in marine applications where it is rated at 370hp.... guess what? It designed to run at rated power and rpm for 100% duty cycle if you want it to
It was designed to be flogged and beaten and not break, so a little extra mass never hurt anyone, especially in the rack
Bp-08;294005 wrote:
You mean the dmax looks like a gasser? /the PSD has the beefiest rods.are you smoking??
if there was a picture that displayed the thickness of the rods you would feel stupid......... just look at the depth of the bearing at the wrist pin...
I was more getting at the PSD piston..... ridiculous.......
Just look a the wrist pin size of the cummins vs the others
I guess when 100% stock and untouched B series bottom ends do 1k+hp/1.5k+ TO there has to be a design flaw....
-
-
zbrown;294006 wrote:
Considering the orginal 12 valve 5.9 B series used in the 1st and half of the 2nd gen dodges is an industrial engine....... hell the same 5.9 B series is used in marine applications where it is rated at 370hp.... guess what? It designed to run at rated power and rpm for 100% duty cycle if you want it toIt was designed to be flogged and beaten and not break, so a little extra mass never hurt anyone, especially in the rack
Bingo. They put the B series Cummins in a ton of shit...buses, dump trucks, etc. Plus, that doesn't even count the "heavy" diesel versions that Cummins builds that "competes" with the Cats. M11, ISL, C8.3, etc
DrifterExtreme;294007 wrote:
Bp your retarded.Thank you.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login