Lame
-
Grr;303287 wrote:
maybe they will FINALLY have a car that can beat a STOCK 87 grand national, too bad i got 26-27mpg with that 24 year old car........wheres the damn ecoboost?? fuck that pos OHC 5.0
Maybe it will actually be able to beat the 300hp 3.6L V6 camaro that gets 29mpg....... but i doubt it
the mustang is also getting a 300hp v6
-
I don't see it as bait its a legit topic for discussion. Ford puts the best V8 they have ever produced, into the one of the best selling and longest lived cars ever produced seems fairly important to me. Then again I'm a bit biased.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
Very true ^
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall
Torque is how far you take the wall with you -
MisterCMK;303268 wrote:
http://jalopnik.com/5494178/2011-ford-mustang-gt-412-hp-and-26-mpgOnly 412hp. Weak.
What's weak? Cmk buying one or are the blocks going to crack at 500 horses:icon_rr::icon_rr::icon_rr:
-
Grr;303287 wrote:
maybe they will FINALLY have a car that can beat a STOCK 87 grand national, too bad i got 26-27mpg with that 24 year old car........wheres the damn ecoboost?? fuck that pos OHC 5.0
Maybe it will actually be able to beat the 300hp 3.6L V6 camaro that gets 29mpg....... but i doubt it
the camaro weights alot more than the 2011 mustang :icon_scratch:
-
I wonder if there will be a re-call like there was with the 2010' model??
-
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOQcc1JyRVs&playnext_from=TL&videos=p2-AA78keUw&feature=sub[/ame]
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
Cobra Rob;303332 wrote:
the camaro weights alot more than the 2011 mustang :icon_scratch:Cobra Rob;303334 wrote:
also the new 5.0 redline is 7000 rpm that is interesting:)Who the fuck cares. Its a Mustang. Plasticly piece of shit.
I hate new American muscle. I just dont understand. There is a time and era for everything let it be. Be progressive... do relive the past tards...
-
thrash;305146 wrote:
I think it's cool that Ford can build a car that is faster than yours, easy to mass produce, and gets better fuel economy.Don't forget less expensive to buy and maintain.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
Joel;305186 wrote:
So thats your excuse that your car is better? gas mileage? you sound like a honda civic owner now!dont argue with eurofan he knows all...and if he's wrong it'll turn into a "joke....internet is sooo serious"
-
Eurofan;305195 wrote:
Dude. Its called efficient dynamics. DUHHH :icon_rabbit:they have done dyno numbers on the mustang and the hp claims are not true, its actually more then ford has claimed,since its putting close to 400hp to the wheels stock,
this car will rape must BMW out there no doubt
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login