Aerial Photography/Video?
-
Top End;326073 wrote:
Wasn't able to look at it on my phone. I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be enough, you would need liability insurance in the $500,000+ range.Just curious, why would one would need that much coverage to fly a model airplane?
The per occurrence limit of coverage available by this policy is $2,500,000 involving bodily injury and/or property damage.
It sounds like he has it, but holy crap, that sounds insanely excessive lol. Shows you the state of this country, though.
-
PSiedTSi;326075 wrote:
Just curious, why would one would need that much coverage to fly a model airplane?It sounds like he has it, but holy crap, that sounds insanely excessive lol. Shows you the state of this country, though.Thanks for posting that excerpt! I'm sure the policy is designed to cover even the guys flying monster 60%+ scale gassers, they could definitely do some damage...
-
that was taken on Oak st in north fargo. You live in that area? My parents live on Oak.
-
Top End;326078 wrote:
Insurance is more for liability coverage in case of injuring someone. Other tracks have shown me incidents that seems minor such as a bump and cuts results in a suit for a few million.So pathetic. That's precisely why I was curious why a large policy was needed...I figured there were multiple examples of it, but I guess I was expecting some plane crashing into a building and somehow burning it down causing a boatload of damage or something. I should have guessed it was for potential lawsuits...:rolleyes:
-
GarageAlchemist;326079 wrote:
that was taken on Oak st in north fargo. You live in that area? My parents live on Oak.Good eye and yep, 1000 block on Oak. -
PSiedTSi;326080 wrote:
So pathetic. That's precisely why I was curious why a large policy was needed...I figured there were multiple examples of it, but I guess I was expecting some plane crashing into a building and somehow burning it down causing a boatload of damage or something. I should have guessed it was for potential lawsuits...:rolleyes:Yup, wish it was for something like that but sadly it's to cover someone suing.
-
[email protected];326066 wrote:
Sure - keep in mind this was on a small 34" wingspan aerobatic plane - the one I would build would be much bigger, smoother, quieter, and uh, easier to land...Apologies for the huge file, 174mb.
Right Click > Save Target As:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44928412/MVI_4690.AVIThats really cool! I'm sure it would be great with quieter and more stable plane.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login