95 v6 stang #'s

[Raider]

stock #'s
dyno#s 226 rwhp@ 4800rpm
284 rwtq@ 4000rpm

new #'s 587rwhp/601rwtq 26psi race gas

Mod list
ported single port heads(stock valves)
ported lower intake
custom boxed upper intake
218/224 cam
60mm stock fox body tb
8.2:1 compression 4.2L
main girdle and studs
head studs
roller rockers
custom turbo kit with a 62-1 turbo p-trim turbine wheel with a .81 a/r housing
single 3'' exhaust with a Hooker Aero chamber muffler
underdrive pulley and no a/c or p/s
60# injectors
255 in-tank pump. stock fuel lines and rails.
turbonetic racegate wastegate
bosh blow off valve
custom water/ air intercooler.

[StangerBanger96]

:eek: :eek: holy shit!

[King Ricer]

that's nice i would mind having that one!

[94NDTA]

Something is WAY off. a 95 V6 stang will in no way shape or form dyno 226 rwhp STOCK. Hell, a 95 V8 put s down about 220-230 rwhp. Something is fishy.

EDIT: on a MUSTANG dyno none the less. Hell on a mustang dyno MY car stock would dyno around 220 rwhp.

This thing would be pushing around 260 rwhp on a dynojet, about 650 rwhp with the mods

All on stock internals? Something is REALLY fishy here. I'm not buying it.

[King Ricer]

94NDTA wrote:
Something is WAY off. a 95 V6 stang will in no way shape or form dyno 226 rwhp STOCK. Hell, a 95 V8 put s down about 220-230 rwhp. Something is fishy.

EDIT: on a MUSTANG dyno none the less. Hell on a mustang dyno MY car stock would dyno around 220 rwhp.

This thing would be pushing around 260 rwhp on a dynojet, about 650 rwhp with the mods

All on stock internals? Something is REALLY fishy here. I'm not buying it.

your just mad because it would beat your car, JK

[94NDTA]

97Cav wrote:
your just mad because it would beat your car, JK
The truth comes out

Actually, I'm just trying to clear some things up.

Now it that were a 4.6L instead of a 3.8L, I might beleive it. It's still a hefty load to be putting on a stock bottom end though.

[PSiedTSi]

hey smarty did you see it was a 4.2liter with 8.2:1 compression....no where did it say it was stock bottom end

[out there]

i don't think it's a stock block, the displacement is listed as 4.2, and compression at 8.2
i think that the 60mm tb is definitely a bottleneck in this setup, at least a 75mm

[dubbsy]

94NDTA wrote:
Something is WAY off. a 95 V6 stang will in no way shape or form dyno 226 rwhp STOCK.

closer to 140-145 rwhp stock I would guess....

Built 4.2L? (Probably, that's alotta boost)

Raider, who's car is that?

[My NOva]

nice numbers cant wait until i do my dyno tune

[smtomps1955]

thats is pretty nice, pretty nice mod list also

[Raider]

some guy on v6power.com posted his results and thought I would share

[StangerBanger96]

94NDTA wrote:
Something is WAY off. a 95 V6 stang will in no way shape or form dyno 226 rwhp STOCK. Hell, a 95 V8 put s down about 220-230 rwhp. Something is fishy.

EDIT: on a MUSTANG dyno none the less. Hell on a mustang dyno MY car stock would dyno around 220 rwhp.

This thing would be pushing around 260 rwhp on a dynojet, about 650 rwhp with the mods

All on stock internals? Something is REALLY fishy here. I'm not buying it.

Its a 3.8 stock, its bored out to 4.2

[94NDTA]

StangerBanger96 wrote:
Its a 3.8 stock, its bored out to 4.2
Sorry guys, In my opinion a bored out 4.2 isn't stock. I guess thats what threw me off. I didn't see where it said 4.2. I still wouldnot lable it as a stock baseline, but that's just me.

[Guest]

I have heard about these V6 stangs making great power from being turbocharged Otherwise it is uber hard to make any power with them even with a supercharger.

[03SVT]

The guy that tuned my car in Winnipeg, Ed Hohenberg at wolfperformance.com was telling me he was able to tune a V6 to about 270HP. That was with headwork, cams, exhaust, and intake. It is pretty realistic, I think. I don't know why anyone wouldn't just buy a 5.0 or 4.6 and put in the car, but to each his own.

[dubbsy]

03SVT wrote:
The guy that tuned my car in Winnipeg, Ed Hohenberg at wolfperformance.com was telling me he was able to tune a V6 to about 270HP. That was with headwork, cams, exhaust, and intake. It is pretty realistic, I think. I don't know why anyone wouldn't just buy a 5.0 or 4.6 and put in the car, but to each his own.

270 crank I sure hope... and even that requires some explaining IMO....

[Guest]

Yeah it does those 3.8's are weak as hell I beat one in my mom's Lumina for Christ's sake.

[03SVT]

dubbsy wrote:
270 crank I sure hope... and even that requires some explaining IMO....

The guy is probably one of the better tuners in North America and he tuned it. It was WHP. I don' t know how he did it, but he, like myself, have absolutely no reason to make up stories.

[dubbsy]

03SVT wrote:
The guy is probably one of the better tuners in North America and he tuned it. It was WHP. I don' t know how he did it, but he, like myself, have absolutely no reason to make up stories.
any block work? (4.2 or still the 3.8?)