Not your ordinary ricer car
-
YellowEvo wrote:
tin your just mad you have a centimeter peterAtleast I get some....
-
Anyways...back to the main topic.........
The graph above demonstrates the horsepower at the wheels
measured on an inertia type dyno which is the general industry
standard for power measurement in the US. The US specification
350Z used for this test was run with the following configuration:* APS 350Z Twin Turbo High Output System * APS Test Pipes * APS High Output Cat Back Exhaust System * Premium 94 (R+M)/2 fuel * 9.2 psi Turbocharger Pressure - (Turbocharger pressure for development/test data only - couldn't help bumping up the boost ;-) - 8 psi production target)Standing 1/4 Mile - 11.97 sec @ 116 mph (preliminary testing - US
Specification APS Development Vehicle)Sources: airpowersystems.com and my350z.com
-
RX8ownage wrote:
you show me where a TT Z hits low 12's, and ill do something to you thats never been done. until then, your still a dick.What are you going to do for me kirky?
-
fuel system and exhaust is kinda considered supporting mods in mine and nearly everyone elses book...sorta pointless and or impossible without them
-
All 350z turbo kits comes with engine management and fuel system. He already have Greddy headers and exhaust.
-
he just told you the kit comes with fuel management...
-
YellowEvo wrote:
well nick said he'd beat me with just a TT kit so you lose try againYou are fuckin pathetic.....
-
T ! N wrote:
Anyways...back to the main topic.........The graph above demonstrates the horsepower at the wheels
measured on an inertia type dyno which is the general industry
standard for power measurement in the US. The US specification
350Z used for this test was run with the following configuration:* APS 350Z Twin Turbo High Output System * APS Test Pipes * APS High Output Cat Back Exhaust System * Premium 94 (R+M)/2 fuel * 9.2 psi Turbocharger Pressure - (Turbocharger pressure for development/test data only - couldn't help bumping up the boost ;-) - 8 psi production target)Standing 1/4 Mile - 11.97 sec @ 116 mph (preliminary testing - US
Specification APS Development Vehicle)Sources: airpowersystems.com and my350z.com
It doesn't really matter you guys. Here's the thing, without an incredible driver, you're never going to achieve the results that are posted by companies. I was talking with a few of you on AIM the other day about this.
Now about this dyno graph, you can see they were running more boost then a normal person would for daily driving ... they even made a comment about that. That Twin Turbo kit includes a BUNCH of stuff... either way, I think the evo would have a good race for it... if it does beat it, so be it... he's got about 4x invested in to mods then the evo does.
Those TT kits for the 350z are NOT cheap, we're talking about 5000-6000 WITHOUT a FMIC. Regardless of the driving skill the evo would kill it on the launch anyway....
Both are cool cars. Anybody watch the Top Gear review of the 350z? hehehe...
-
Tony from Norwood Autocraft did a pimp twin setup on a customer car back when he worked at Jotech. 8 psi it did near 500 whp on a stock block. Over a 12k dollar setup from what I remember reading however. It's all about what you want to spend.
-
show me a vid. thanks!
-
close to a tt z running 12's huh nick. lmfao!!
-
Jim wrote:
It doesn't really matter you guys. Here's the thing, without an incredible driver, you're never going to achieve the results that are posted by companies. I was talking with a few of you on AIM the other day about this.Now about this dyno graph, you can see they were running more boost then a normal person would for daily driving ... they even made a comment about that. That Twin Turbo kit includes a BUNCH of stuff... either way, I think the evo would have a good race for it... if it does beat it, so be it... he's got about 4x invested in to mods then the evo does.
Those TT kits for the 350z are NOT cheap, we're talking about 5000-6000 WITHOUT a FMIC. Regardless of the driving skill the evo would kill it on the launch anyway....
Both are cool cars. Anybody watch the Top Gear review of the 350z? hehehe...
9.2 PSI is a mediocre 1.2 PSI increase. The general rule of thumb is each pound of boost you add will make the same amount of horsepower equal to your compression ratio. It will have made less than 10 horses upping it that high. And besides, most people increase their boost during a track day run anyways.
*All * (competent) turbo kits include engine management and extra fuel delivery devices. Being able to make that kind of power without an intercooler opens up the potential of even more power. I wouldn't exactly count the Z out at a launch; although it doesn't have AWD, it does have a considerable amount of torque over a 4g63.
It could probably do it.
Back to the original post... that Z is hideous.
2005 Mercedes-Benz C240 4Matic
1993 Mazda Rx-7 Twin Turbo (sold)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login