spoolude...
-
that's pretty respectable for stock... especially talking about 10 years ago and also the fact that the higher miles the stock engine may already have
-
shit when almost everybody on this site has a dsm its hard to win. go on honda-tech and say that hondas suck and the people with dsms will get owned. everybody can think that what they want to think
-
Also on honda tech people claim 25 whp gains with a CAI on a D17 (7th gen civic motor)
-
ya heres a race for u dsm owners any year gsx vs s2k
o heres another one evo vs nsx
-
there a a couple 1G DSMs on here that would have no trouble disposing of an s2000.....
-
92BlackTT wrote:
there a a couple 1G DSMs on here that would have no trouble disposing of an s2000.....not stock u dsm's would get run over
-
You never said stock...what fun is that. Thats like saying a vette could run over a lumina, der a 13 second car (s2000)can beat a fifteen second carstock (DSM). Are you going to tell us the sky is blue or read left to right top to bottom?
-
wuts a s2000 run compared to the evo the evo would walk on it right?
-
stating the obvious again here chief...
-
ok this is old can sombody make somthing else to fight over
-
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html this is a pretty cool website, it lists all the 0-60 and 1/4 times for stock cars. but it also says a 2G eclipse gst is faster than a 1G eclipse gst and im not sure if thats true
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login