OFFICIAL NFL thread
-
99slowGSX wrote:
Eagles arent that good, plus they have no TO aka "the whole team".Agreed, but I do think they will edge out the Vikings.
But really when it comes down to it, that AFC is taking the superbowl this year, so why argue about the NFC playoffs?
-
95TsiAWD wrote:
Yep that is my quote, but where in there does it say I care? all it says is I thought GB would win. I admit I thought they would win, so did most.
But the Vikings bought their best game of the year and took the win!Read my last post and you will understand hopefully why I dont care!
Well if you dont care, why are you still posting, leaky eyes? -
STiSchucky wrote:
Please, you wouldve been yucking it up if the pack woulda won. Not like it really matters about winning 3 straight regular season games, it doesnt affect the out come for the other season.Actually I probly wouldnt of posted anything at all. But its just funny how the Vikings get one win in the playoffs and everyone is jumping for joy, lol.
-
99slowGSX wrote:
Well you are right, the Vikes could easily choke next week..........it would be hard for them to show up two games in a row.THANK YOU! A Vikings fan that can admit he knows they MAY lose and arent the GREATEST team ever. You are a True GOOD vikings fan, why cant tehre be more like you?
But now Im done talking about this, since at least one got the point.
-
95TsiAWD wrote:
Agreed, but I do think they will edge out the Vikings.But really when it comes down to it, that AFC is taking the superbowl this year, so why argue about the NFC playoffs?
Not necessarily, last few Superbowls have been nothing but nail biters. 2 Vinateri field goals at the last second against the Rams and Panthers, The Rams winning it in 2000 by a yard over the titans. THe only really one that was a blow out was Tampa and Oakland the last few years. Teams when they get to the superbowl, usually just don't flop on their face is what I'm saying. Besides, the Vikes barely lost to the colts @ indy, and havent played the Steelers or Pats yet. One of those 3 would represent the AFC, not the Jets, so who knows right? -
WTF? Didnt i just say this was a roller coaster team??? You dont know what team is going to show up but if the right team shows up they can hang with the best? geezes.
-
95TsiAWD wrote:
THANK YOU! A Vikings fan that can admit he knows they MAY lose and arent the GREATEST team ever. You are a True GOOD vikings fan, why cant tehre be more like you?But now Im done talking about this, since at least one got the point.
The man you speak of is not that much of a fan, more of a banwagon jumper:p
Your team lost to the Vikings. hahaha
Nothing else matters.
See ya next year GB.
Regardless of the outcome of the Philly game, no one can take away the fact that we beat the Packers....at Lambeau (I thought GB didn't lose at home in the playoffs)...on grass (I thought we couldn't win on grass)...in below 32 degree weather (what happened to Favre being unbeatable in cold weather...as an 8-8 team (only one 8-8 team had ever won in the playoffs as an 8-8 team B4 yesterday)
We may not be the greatest team ever but it sure feels good when OUR team kicks the shit out of YOUR team <u>when it matters</u> -
HandoEX wrote:
Also, as I have said before, Brett Favre is the most overrated QB ever.
He's still done the one thing that IMHO Culpepper will never do...win a superbowl...or even get to one for that matter. I'm not saying the packers are a better team than MN and I'm not living in the past with that statement either, its a fact. Both are active still and one has a ring, one doesn't. Maybe I'll be wrong and culpepper will get one. I'd say moss probably will if/when he decides he doesn't want to be part of a perrenial choking team. -
STiSchucky wrote:
WTF? Didnt i just say this was a roller coaster team??? You dont know what team is going to show up but if the right team shows up they can hang with the best? geezes.
Hell, I'll even say that about the vikings. IF they play like they did yesterday they can beat anyone or at least hang w/ them. -
tjamz wrote:
He's still done the one thing that IMHO Culpepper will never do...win a superbowl...or even get to one for that matter. I'm not saying the packers are a better team than MN and I'm not living in the past with that statement either, its a fact. Both are active still and one has a ring, one doesn't. Maybe I'll be wrong and culpepper will get one. I'd say moss probably will if/when he decides he doesn't want to be part of a perrenial choking team.
Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson have won just as many Super Bowls as your boy. WTF is your point?
Winning a Super Bowl doesn't change the fact that Favre is the most overrated QB ever now does it? -
the Steelers are gonna win the superbowl anyways!
-
anyone ever mention...favre sucks?
-
HandoEX wrote:
Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson have won just as many Super Bowls as your boy. WTF is your point?
Winning a Super Bowl doesn't change the fact that Favre is the most overrated QB ever now does it?
Defense got both of those QBs their rings not their ability. -
HandoEX wrote:
Same with Favre.We had some good offense to go along with the defense.
If Culpepper could make it to the Super Bowl he would get my respect because he would have to do it pretty much on his lonesome.
-
The difference now compared to regular season; is that if the Vikings Lose they are done for the season.. So the fight is to stay alive; that's why it could be a whole new ball game. As for losing the 3 games in a row to the Vikes; I was referring to Season/Play offs; not this season and last season..... Statitistics between the two teams are really close on win/loses in MN and in GB.. Eagles don't have T.0.; and another starter I believe.. Two good starters out.... Now when we play'd the eagles we didn't get our butt kicked as bad as the Pack did
So like I said anything is possible.. We may likely make it to the NFC division title game The Vikings have Talent; IMO more talent than GB; so in theory the Vikes on a good day versus GB on a good day i'd put my $$ on The Vikes.... But Vikings just tend to had two games more of playing on a bad day.. But if you look at their stats they lost by only 3 points or so like 3 or more times. GB twice (Fieldgaol) Redskins also and who knows who else. They're regular season stats could of easily been better.. Only games they had a blow out off the top of my head were the Giants and Eagles where they had easily 1 or more points in Touchdowns.... In the NFL game; it seems the worst team has the potential to beat the best team.. Just all depends who's got the head on that day and shows up and plays.... I'm still rooting for the Vikes to beat the Eagles..... I hope they go Far! And I think Culpepper is having a great Year! they'd be talking about him if Manning? wasn't doing so much good too.. Neways I just laugh how ppl are whining about the Vikes win over GB and assume they'll lose the next game like they assumed they would lose to GB; it's any1's ball game... It's just who has the better day!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login