Paris Hilton
-
Its not about the cost, its the principle of the matter. If they had let her out early they would be setting a bad precedent of letting people out early and for bogus reasons. There would be a ton of cases where someone claims that it is discrimination that Paris gets let out early and yet they have to serve their time in prison.
-
MisterCMK;173270 wrote:
Its not about the cost, its the principle of the matter. If they had let her out early they would be setting a bad precedent of letting people out early and for bogus reasons. There would be a ton of cases where someone claims that it is discrimination that Paris gets let out early and yet they have to serve their time in prison.I dont think you are getting what I am trying to say....Most people no matter who you are would not have gotten 45 days in the slammer for driving under suspension. Yes three days too little....but principle of the matter is it is a weak ass crime that didnt deserve the publicity or costs involved.
-
I know someone very well that got two driving under suspensions in one night, the first of which also included a minor in possesion. He got the choice of serving his time in the Cass County jail, Centre (a local halfway house), or on house arrest. His total combined sentence was only 8 days (4 for each DUS).
-
HandoEX;173280 wrote:
I know someone very well that got two driving under suspensions in one night, the first of which also included a minor in possesion. He got the choice of serving his time in the Cass County jail, Centre (a local halfway house), or on house arrest. His total combined sentence was only 8 days (4 for each DUS).That is (IMO) a case where the justice system was entirely too lenient.
-
SmitEvo;173273 wrote:
I dont think you are getting what I am trying to say....Most people no matter who you are would not have gotten 45 days in the slammer for driving under suspension. Yes three days too little....but principle of the matter is it is a weak ass crime that didnt deserve the publicity or costs involved.
first off its jail, not prison. 2 totally different settings.and I agree, she's definately goin to become a better person out of this, hell she said already that her little stupid routine was all an act.
I dont see anything wrong with it, I guess the 1 warning she got didnt send the message and thought her celebrity status could get away with anything.
Right O.J. Simpson?
http://www.law.net/sponsors/duilaw/penalty.htm
96 hours -6 months for 1st time offenders. they dont f around in California
-
STiSchucky;173291 wrote:
first off its jail, not prison. 2 totally different settings.and I agree, she's definately goin to become a better person out of this, hell she said already that her little stupid routine was all an act.
I dont see anything wrong with it, I guess the 1 warning she got didnt send the message and thought her celebrity status could get away with anything.
Right O.J. Simpson?
http://www.law.net/sponsors/duilaw/penalty.htm
96 hours -6 months for 1st time offenders. they dont f around in California
When did I ever say prison....
-
slammer. kinda figured you meant prison, heh.
-
I just want to know one thing. How did a thread about Parasite Hilton get to be even 4 pages long?
Sterling Archer: Oh my god! You killed a hooker!
Cyril Figgis: Call girl!
Sterling Archer: No Cyril! When they're dead they're just hookers!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login