My new car
-
GarageAlchemist;186173 wrote:
i havent ever seen another Tii in town, pics or die. I was just listing the RX7s because of CMK's comment. There are 100x the mustangs in town as RX7's.there is another T2. lives in Moorhead by my parents. Dude is original owner, has every options other than auto(louvers!) and has had seat covers on it since 1987. Less than 100k, and the car looks minty fresh
-
I saw an FC sitting behind Gateway Nissan a couple of months back. I'd love to take apart one of those motors. lol Then swap in a carb'd small block V8 put lake pipes on it and flame throwers and baby moon hub caps then paint on purple ghost flames. Oh and some huge whitewalls too.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
bubba;186284 wrote:
You are so gay....by the way his 80ci > your 302ci...If you couldn't tell that was a joke. I'm not saying the rotory engine doesn't have its advantages, torque is definatly not one of them though. My stock 302 makes more torque than two of those rotory engines put together. More torque equals more fun on the street. Werd
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8 -
capitlj;186305 wrote:
More torque equals more fun on the street. Werdum no.....
A better power to weight is fun on the streets
my stock 5.9 cummins has double the torque of your 302 and it isnt as fun as my car,
I helped pop the cherry on heaths car by the way
-
ha i ment a stock cummins... i would of said 4Xs the To if i was talking about mine once the 200 sticks are in.... i put the 4k gov springs in yesterday and the $1400 converter goes in this weekend..... then your dad gets to touch my plungers and barrels
a 12 valve that fuels fully till 4k instead of 2.1k is interesting...
Its just easier to get a good power:weight with a 7.... or even more so like parker
ha -
zbrown;186323 wrote:
ha i ment a stock cummins... i would of said 4Xs the To if i was talking about mine once the 200 sticks are in.... i put the 4k gov springs in yesterday and the $1400 converter goes in this weekend..... then your dad gets to touch my plungers and barrelsa 12 valve that fuels fully till 4k instead of 2.1k is interesting...
Its just easier to get a good power:weight with a 7.... or even more so like parker
haLOL! I'll make sure to tell him to read this!
-
you helped me ghetto hack some shit out, and left me in the rain with a warning buzzer on in my car, thanks by the way.
-
that belting was your idea, not mine!
-
Ok ok maybe I should clarify my statement a little two identical cars one makes 500 hp at 7000 rpm the other 500 ft/lbs at 2500 rpm which is going to be more fun to drive on the street? I would never trade low end torque for high end power ever, its too much fun to stand on the throttle and lay black mark(s) for a block, without dumping it into gear. I can't argue that my car sounds better tho i love the sound of a piped rotory, like a indy car but with some growl.
> Mitch Hedberg wrote:
> I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.ASE certified parts specialist.
2004 Impala LS 3.8
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login