9/11 pentagon attack

[My NOva]

but was it a 757 do we know???

[Pony_Racer]

just cause pieces of a plane were found at the Pentagon doesnt mean that they couldnt of been placed there....i dont want to sound skeptical but i dont believe it was a plane imo.
The government will stop at nothing to prevent bad info or things that will hurt them to be seen by the public. If it was a airliner than why the hell would the FBI worry about getting any source of video or images taken shortly before the crash? They didnt seem to concened about the WTC crashes, and the beams holding up the WTC didnt collapse because of a fire. They collapsed because of the airliners jet fuel which melted through the beams causing the collapse. And of course the crash site large round holes are not created by an airplane crash thats just common sense.

[Guest]

I agree that the government covers up a lot of stuff they don't want us to know, I'm not sure about this point in particular, but certainly they hide stuff from the general public. Bush has even stated that we have a group of people who do nothing but spread misinformation in an attempt to confuse terrorists....kinda sounds like admitting to lying to us if you ask me.

[PSiedTSi]

yeah you smarty pants the jetfuel that burned really hot...thats what made the beams collapse...der

[Pony_Racer]

PSiedTSi wrote:
yeah you smarty pants the jetfuel that burned really hot...thats what made the beams collapse...der

yeah that was kind of a smart ass comment huh lol......had to

[HandoEX]

This post is deleted!

[HandoEX]

This post is deleted!

[HandoEX]

Note: this is from a study done by Purdue University. It shows the height of the jet if it actually hit the Pentagon where it did.

[StangerBanger96]

heres another site kinda like it
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm

ive also seen a site that shows pictures of the plane found at the pentagon as well though.

[Pony_Racer]

ok but in those pictures the plane hit the lawn first...which if it made actually made the "impact" there would be tires marks and assuming it wasnt a soft landing i'm sure the tires and other thing would break off causing more of a "rut" in the ground and there was not marks....at all.

[HandoEX]

Nope, no marks. No wings. No real evidence of anything on the internet.
If anyone can <u>PROVE</u> anything from what is shown on the net, I'll owe you a beer.

[My NOva]

thank you

[Pony_Racer]

thats obvious evidence right there lol.....it wasnt the 757!!

[Joel]

99slowGSX wrote:
How do you know there is really outer space? All you have seen is pictures.........there is no wind on the moon, so why does the flag have ripples????????
There is wind, just no oxygen...

[Guest]

PSiedTSi wrote:
yeah you smarty pants the jetfuel that burned really hot...thats what made the beams collapse...der
I forget the exact #'s but jet fuel burns something like 400 degrees colder than what those beam should have been able to withstand. I'll see if I can find the source of that in a bit.

[SmitEvo]

Damn conpiracy theorists........9/11 is one big hoax right?

[Bryce]

99slowGSX wrote:
Damn conpiracy theorists........9/11 is one big hoax right?
So was landing on the moon!

For all you know I could be a AOL Chat bot!

[Guest]

no, I'm not saying it was a hoax, I'm saying there was more involved than we as civilians know.

[SmitEvo]

Well I dont think our own government is going to fly a plane into the pentagon.........

[LT1]

not a plane since ther is no evidence of a plane hitting the pentagon...a missle...maybe