Forum Noob Here
-
-
-
Welcome
-
JN210;220789 wrote:
Sweet, a camaro? V8 right?....do you have a mullet? lol, jk. Welcome to FSAnd you wonder why people give you a rough time.........geez!
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall
Torque is how far you take the wall with you -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
bubba;221012 wrote:
I thought u had to have a mullet to even be able to buy a camaro, lol.J/k welcome to the site...
ruthless351;220809 wrote:
And you wonder why people give you a rough time.........geez!I was kiddin, Im not the only one....
*1989 Nissan 300ZX Z31 *
DelSlow;262050 wrote:
I like the new JN210 -
-
out there;220967 wrote:
there's no replacement for displacement... unless you want efficient power
thanks for the welcomes.
Efficient how?
-
Is anyone going to explain how they are more efficient?
-
-
NoReplacemnt4Displacemnt;221306 wrote:
Is anyone going to explain how they are more efficient?I think he is trying to state engines with OHC's, 4 valve heads, variable valve timming... ect to be more efficient than 2 valve pushrod engines..... but
we know simplicity FTW................ rotary >>> anything
-
that is what i mean; i'll take 100+hp/L anyday (honda k20). for your 305 to be as efficient, it would need to make 700+hp. in fact, if we're talking rotaries... than you're looking at 1000+hp for the 305 (200hp/L with the n/a rx8). i don't think adding a turbocharger is a fair comparison (when discussing efficiency of design) because any engine can be boosted.
i would have replied sooner, except that my connection was down yesterday and part of wed (firewall/router/dns/dhcp server was down)
-
-
out there;221321 wrote:
that is what i mean; i'll take 100+hp/L anyday (honda k20). for your 305 to be as efficient, it would need to make 700+hp. in fact, if we're talking rotaries... than you're looking at 1000+hp for the 305 (200hp/L with the n/a rx8). i don't think adding a turbocharger is a fair comparison (when discussing efficiency of design) because any engine can be boosted.i would have replied sooner, except that my connection was down yesterday and part of wed (firewall/router/dns/dhcp server was down)
ZOMGHONDAenjinsISeffiecientANDstuffz... If I could have a WS6 or a civic Si... Hmmmmm.... wouldnt be the Si.For one, a 13b displaces 2.6 liters per revolution, so thats not true, and secondly there is No replacement for displacement period, you cannot argue that statement. we've been through this already.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login