So anyone voting for the yes no yes?
-
MisterCMK;221875 wrote:
YOU are free to leave the establishment...Don't really have to anymore, according to tonight's voting.
-
MisterCMK;221875 wrote:
I haven't read the thread but how can somebody justify infringing on the rights of one to protect the rights of another?YES!!!!!! FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!! someone who agrees. thank you
-
iluvracing;221877 wrote:
YES!!!!!! FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!! someone who agrees. thank youA person who isn't smoking doesn't infringe on your privilege of being in the bar. However, a person who is smoking infringes upon other peoples' right to health. Saying "You have the right to leave the bar" doesn't hold any weight, because the non-smoker will just resort back to the same argument.
-
true. so just go to a bar that doesn't allow smoking.
-
iluvracing;221879 wrote:
true. so just go to a bar that doesn't allow smoking.I don't have to. I have the privilege of choosing which bar to patronize and the right to clean air inside. Legally, my argument is reinforced by citizens who voted tonight. You can either go outside, quit or go to a bar that allows smoking.
-
reshalghoul;221878 wrote:
A person who isn't smoking doesn't infringe on your privilege of being in the bar. However, a person who is smoking infringes upon other peoples' right to health. Saying "You have the right to leave the bar" doesn't hold any weight, because the non-smoker will just resort back to the same argument.They can leave the bar. Nobody is forcing them to be there. They made a CHOICE to be in the bar and they can choose to leave if they don't want to deal with smoke. The fact of the matter is that taking the rights of one person in order to "protect" the rights of another is bullshit.
-
MisterCMK;221883 wrote:
Oh and sprinklers don't save lives.Smoking bans make me want to stand outside of a bar and blow smoke on people. :lol:
ha. that's kinda harsh but I hear ya man.
-
MisterCMK;221883 wrote:
Oh and sprinklers don't save lives.Smoking bans make me want to stand outside of a bar and blow smoke on people. :lol:
Actually, could you please smoke much more frequently? It'd be nice if you could remove yourself from the gene pool at a quicker rate.
Thanks!
-
MisterCMK;221884 wrote:
They can leave the bar. Nobody is forcing them to be there. They made a CHOICE to be in the bar and they can choose to leave if they don't want to deal with smoke. The fact of the matter is that taking the rights of one person in order to "protect" the rights of another is bullshit.I would concede smoking as a "right" if smokers couldn't purchase health insurance or couldn't undergo medical procedures related to their smoking if they, you know, did indeed develop lung cancer or something similar. I hate it when people abuse their bodies, then expect everyone else to pick up the tab.
-
MisterCMK;221888 wrote:
I lawl because I don't actually smoke...Just as I suspected, you're being a douche for the sake of being a douche. It's your natural calling.
-
MisterCMK;221884 wrote:
They can leave the bar. Nobody is forcing them to be there. They made a CHOICE to be in the bar and they can choose to leave if they don't want to deal with smoke. The fact of the matter is that taking the rights of one person in order to "protect" the rights of another is bullshit.QFT^^
-
iluvracing;221877 wrote:
YES!!!!!! FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!! someone who agrees. thank youFunny, I read that as saying the "rights" of smokers shouldn't infringe on the "rights" of non-smokers who have the "right" to breath clean air....
-
MisterCMK;221892 wrote:
And you take the bait every fucking time.Lol, yeah I "[took] the bait" for sure. It sure is pretty difficult to argue with the mentally challenged CMK. For someone with an IQ below 60, you do put up quite the fight. Back to the institution for you!
-
Actually, CMK is fairly intelligent and well versed in the subject he debates. He does, however, have the ability to make others look like idiots, seemingly at will.
-
MisterCMK;221884 wrote:
The fact of the matter is that taking the rights of one person in order to "protect" the rights of another is bullshit.As I said before, this is what all laws do.
Has anyone heard the outcome of the vote?
DaveH
'94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph -
approx 60 to 40 in favor of a smoking ban in both fargo and west fargo.
Fargo Initiated Smoking Ban Ord. CITY OF FARGO
Vote for no more than 1
Yes - Means you approve. . . . . . 11,371 61.30%
No - Means you reject th . . . . . 7,180 38.70%
Total . . . . . . . . . 18,551
Over Votes . . . . . . . . . 33
Under Votes . . . . . . . . . 198West Fargo Smoking Ordinance 803 CITY OF WEST FARGO Vote for no more than 1 Yes - Means you approve. . . . . . 2,069 57.60% No - Means you reject th . . . . . 1,523 42.40% Total . . . . . . . . . 3,592 Over Votes . . . . . . . . . 2 Under Votes . . . . . . . . . 54
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login