New for 2009 Crx build thread!

[inspector01]

zbrown;240841 wrote:
really?

I saw the teg and it looks like a fun project

Im sorry, i obviously didn't clarify enough. They make a lot of torque for a Honda engine. Most Turbo D's will make quite a bit more torque than a B-series with similar HP.

[bubba]

inspector01;240832 wrote:
Yes Bryce does fail, at continuing to be slow.....Not everyone can build a B20/Vtec for 4 years.....

Bryce, you will be my Hero if you get this done (not that you aren't already), now stick to it. And yes D-series make some Nasty torque....

Ya.. since 1=4 huh... sorry I've worked on my car like a week since the beginning of the year... I have too much other shit going on...

[gsrEK]

like working 2 days a week lolz just givin ya a hard time

[inspector01]

Bubba, im just giving you shit like you are giving bryce shit....

[Bryce]

Do you see what I see?

[bubba]

Bryce;240926 wrote:
Do you see what I see?

A DC1 with yellow recaros (pimp), and a ITR wing?

[bubba]

gsrEK;240867 wrote:
like working 2 days a week lolz just givin ya a hard time

3 to be exact, unless i take time off...

[Bryce]

bubba;240943 wrote:
A DC1 with yellow recaros (pimp), and a ITR wing?

And...... what else blind guy.

[01tib]

lawls at integra

[bubba]

Bryce;240973 wrote:
And...... what else blind guy.

DC1 = D16 teg... Did u get the pics from Honda-Tech, cause I remember a car just like that on there, which is where i first found out bout the d16 teg...

[Bassplayer]

So why not just boost the ls/Vtec?

[Bryce]

Bassplayer;241032 wrote:
So why not just boost the ls/Vtec?

Ls/Vtec motors are not the most stable of platforms to use FI on. Cost is the big issue. I could have a built z6 in there for the price it would take to build a stock Ls/vtec. B-series hydro trannys are much more money then a y8/z6 tranny, and much more rare in the us. Just that alone almost makes it worth it in my eyes.

I also love the idea of rocking a sohc motor in a car that (In america) only came with dohc motors.

[Rexwagon]

are you going to jump on the E-85 bandwagon as well?

[Bryce]

Rexwagon;241053 wrote:
are you going to jump on the E-85 bandwagon as well?

Mabye I'm not sure yet.

[MisterCMK]

Rexwagon;241053 wrote:
are you going to jump on the E-85 bandwagon as well?

You should with your WRX.

[ruthless351]

MisterCMK;241066 wrote:
You should with your WRX.

He cant...he's getting out of the scene.....:icon_silent:

[MisterCMK]

ruthless351;241079 wrote:
He cant...he's getting out of the scene.....:icon_silent:

Aah yes, I seem to have forgotten that little tid-bit. It is a good thing he is upset at me and will not respond though, as I don't think I could handle it.

[Rexwagon]

Bryce;241063 wrote:
Mabye I'm not sure yet.

It seems like people are making good power on it.

[inspector01]

Rexwagon;241115 wrote:
It seems like people are making good power on it.

I think that is kind of obvious since it is around 105 octane....

[bubba]

I'd strongly suggest doing e-85 in that, especially for a street/strip car... i havent heard of any problems from it, other than having to re-tune a cpl times a year...