Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. Multimedia and Photoshop
  4. Droooooolllll

Droooooolllll

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Multimedia and Photoshop
69 Posts 22 Posters 8.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SlowicaS Offline
    SlowicaS Offline
    Slowica
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    They definatley build some insane motors. I have to agree that they went WAY overboard on the polished parts though. try showing off your engine when its a sunny day out.

    1993 240sx hatch - project/money pit
    1998 Grand Cherokee LTD - Winter beater

    N/A is the expensive way to go slow

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • zbrownZ Offline
      zbrownZ Offline
      zbrown
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      weshole;246431 wrote:
      There aint no chrome there fellas. It's almost all polished aluminum.

      thank you wes.... goddamn

      rx7-8.89@157mph
      12v dodge, twins

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fdfreakF Offline
        fdfreakF Offline
        fdfreak
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        Gary your right about the reliability of the V8 compared to a 4cyl at the same HP. but the fact that only about 5% of the population of fargo could afford to drop that kind of cash on an engine like that and theres even a less percentage of people that are into race cars. Most of us "ricers" (I hate that freaking word) build what we can afford. and its alot cheaper to hop up a 4cyl than a V8.

        this is like comparing a ferrari to a civic. you can rant and rave all you want about the ferrari and compare the specs to the civic, but the 99.99% will have to settle for the civic. all we can do is sit droooolll over what we cant have and probably never will have.

        legacy image

        [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

        12.645@118mph 12.6psi

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SlowicaS Offline
          SlowicaS Offline
          Slowica
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          fdfreak;246453 wrote:
          Gary your right about the reliability of the V8 compared to a 4cyl at the same HP. but the fact that only about 5% of the population of fargo could afford to drop that kind of cash on an engine like that and theres even a less percentage of people that are into race cars. Most of us "ricers" (I hate that freaking word) build what we can afford. and its alot cheaper to hop up a 4cyl than a V8.

          this is like comparing a ferrari to a civic. you can rant and rave all you want about the ferrari and compare the specs to the civic, but the 99.99% will have to settle for the civic. all we can do is sit droooolll over what we cant have and probably never will have.

          well said

          1993 240sx hatch - project/money pit
          1998 Grand Cherokee LTD - Winter beater

          N/A is the expensive way to go slow

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • zbrownZ Offline
            zbrownZ Offline
            zbrown
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            fdfreak;246453 wrote:
            and its alot cheaper to hop up a 4cyl than a V8.

            please explain.......

            rx7-8.89@157mph
            12v dodge, twins

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fdfreakF Offline
              fdfreakF Offline
              fdfreak
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              those are some sick engines though! you can never have too much polished aluminum.

              legacy image

              [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

              12.645@118mph 12.6psi

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • fdfreakF Offline
                fdfreakF Offline
                fdfreak
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                zbrown;246457 wrote:
                please explain.......

                ok, ask travis how much he has into his civic (its nothing extravegant, but respectable). I think he said he was putting down somewhere between 320-340 in his coupe and at the track he was running mid 12's.

                I dont know very many people around here with V8's, but I am willing to bet it would cost more to build a v8 to see the same track times.

                Im not saying thats the case everytime. but probably majority.

                legacy image

                [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                12.645@118mph 12.6psi

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SlowicaS Offline
                  SlowicaS Offline
                  Slowica
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  V8s are usually going to be cheaper to build for speed. i don't really see to many cheap V8 platforms around here though... unless you want an old foxbody rustang i guess

                  1993 240sx hatch - project/money pit
                  1998 Grand Cherokee LTD - Winter beater

                  N/A is the expensive way to go slow

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bubbaB Offline
                    bubbaB Offline
                    bubba
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    fdfreak;246458 wrote:
                    those are some sick engines though! you can never have too much polished aluminum.

                    Makes the inner negro in me wanna scream BLING BLING

                    Current Cars:
                    08 Honda Ruckus - Stunt Machine
                    93 Subaru Impreza L - DD/ Winter beater
                    90 Honda CRX - Project car
                    90 Honda CRX Dx - Burnt (R.I.P.) - Racecar

                    Past Cars: 85 Chevy C-10, 87 Dodge D-50, 91 Honda Prelude Si, 91 Buick Regal, 91 Acura Integra Ls, 87 Mazda RX-7, 90 Honda Civic Si, 91 Honda Civic Si, 89 Chevy S-10, 91 Honda Crx Hf, 91 Acura Integra Rs, 95 Subaru Impreza L, 92 Acura Integra GSR, 89 Mazda RX-7 (LT1), 88 Mazda RX-7, 92 Civic Cx, 87 Mazda RX-7 TII

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • wesholeW Offline
                      wesholeW Offline
                      weshole
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      What people fail to take into consideration is the very reason I went sport compact was the ability to make reasonable power not only cheap but to keep the car economical in the process. Not that it cant be done in a V8 but its not going to be cheap to make your typical SBC economical and have reasonable power to boot. Another reason "I" went to the sport compact was the "fun" factor. It's a helluva lot funner to hang some corners "with confidence" or rice around in with most of these cars. There was NO FUKN WAY I was gonna try to hang corners in my Chevelle or Nova. I remeber all of my Muscle cars were fun to drive but got boring just cruising around and not being able to get on it without passing a gas station. Meanwhile.... someone comes along and with as quick a car (more agile too) and having half the $$ into it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • GrrG Offline
                        GrrG Offline
                        Grr
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        fdfreak;246459 wrote:
                        ok, ask travis how much he has into his civic (its nothing extravegant, but respectable). I think he said he was putting down somewhere between 320-340 in his coupe and at the track he was running mid 12's.

                        I dont know very many people around here with V8's, but I am willing to bet it would cost more to build a v8 to see the same track times.

                        Im not saying thats the case everytime. but probably majority.

                        your kidding right? so its cheaper to take a 15+ second car with huge limitations in traction, and drivetrain, and make it go 11s-12s relaibly and corner well, than to buy a 14 sec V8 car with rear wheel drive and strong drivetrain to do the same? In my GN i didnt have shit into it, most was just rebuilding or making better like a new fuel tank and lines, paint work and such. In reality i had maybe $8k into my drivetrain front to back. Zac had around 2500 in his RX7 drivetrain (alot of overkill in prep for a turbo setup) and i know for a fact that would have run 12s.
                        Actually i can go buy a LT1 camaro for about 2500 and put 100 shot and tires on it and run 12s, hell you can buy a nice RCSB chevy pickup with a 5.3 and get it to put down good power for a couple thousand at most.
                        I wont even get into fox bodies or 80s GM v8s, thats just too easy

                        BTW, ask travis how long that transmission is going to last

                        2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                        2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • HandoEXH Offline
                          HandoEXH Offline
                          HandoEX
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          Honda 5-speeds are pretty damn strong.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • bubbaB Offline
                            bubbaB Offline
                            bubba
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            Idk bout d series, but I know stock gsr trannies can take a hell of a beating...

                            We're talking bout Honda's not dsms, lol...

                            Current Cars:
                            08 Honda Ruckus - Stunt Machine
                            93 Subaru Impreza L - DD/ Winter beater
                            90 Honda CRX - Project car
                            90 Honda CRX Dx - Burnt (R.I.P.) - Racecar

                            Past Cars: 85 Chevy C-10, 87 Dodge D-50, 91 Honda Prelude Si, 91 Buick Regal, 91 Acura Integra Ls, 87 Mazda RX-7, 90 Honda Civic Si, 91 Honda Civic Si, 89 Chevy S-10, 91 Honda Crx Hf, 91 Acura Integra Rs, 95 Subaru Impreza L, 92 Acura Integra GSR, 89 Mazda RX-7 (LT1), 88 Mazda RX-7, 92 Civic Cx, 87 Mazda RX-7 TII

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • fdfreakF Offline
                              fdfreakF Offline
                              fdfreak
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              ok, you win. i dont care. put mpg into the equation. a lot of these kids use their cars as year round DD. much cheaper than a v8. doesnt matter. I cant afford those engines and If I had $30k to spare, still wouldnt buy it but they are fun to look at.

                              legacy image

                              [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                              12.645@118mph 12.6psi

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • SlowicaS Offline
                                SlowicaS Offline
                                Slowica
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #39

                                travis isn't putting down any ridiculous numbers on that tranny i doubt heel have to many problems with it aside from having to replace clutches a little more then usual. i enjoy my high 20 low 30mpg and still being able to have enough power to have fun. idk about rotarys vs V8s on gas mileage though lol could watch jons gas guage go down if he was driving around in boost :icon_geek: sport compacts are much more fun to drive in the twistys versus trying to throw a tank through em.

                                1993 240sx hatch - project/money pit
                                1998 Grand Cherokee LTD - Winter beater

                                N/A is the expensive way to go slow

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • fdfreakF Offline
                                  fdfreakF Offline
                                  fdfreak
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  rotarys arent great, but i still get 22 on the highway and 15 around town.

                                  legacy image

                                  [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                                  12.645@118mph 12.6psi

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • SlowicaS Offline
                                    SlowicaS Offline
                                    Slowica
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #41

                                    ya jon was getting horrible mileage lol he would go through half a tank driving around town in a night easily. and then he lost compression lol. its been sitting at Lunde a month or so now.

                                    1993 240sx hatch - project/money pit
                                    1998 Grand Cherokee LTD - Winter beater

                                    N/A is the expensive way to go slow

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • capitljC Offline
                                      capitljC Offline
                                      capitlj
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #42

                                      Ask ruthless how much he has in his stang. Its not a lot, plenty to guys like us but not a lot, and he runs 13's with no power adder. And his car looks great doing it too, no offense travis but that rust bucket aint winning any shows, I understand thats not what he wanted that car to do. Also by no means is a fox body or f-body a tank. They are heavier for sure but they have the right layout and a big enough aftermarket to make them out handle a car that is much lighter. Kind of a bad example because its so new but just look at the new CTS-V, well over 2 tons and everyone that drives it is singing its praises, especially in how well it handles and stops.

                                      weshole;246431 wrote:
                                      There aint no chrome there fellas. It's almost all polished aluminum.

                                      I know that my mouth got ahead of my brain as it has a habit of doing

                                      legacy image
                                      > Mitch Hedberg wrote:
                                      > I'm sick of following my dreams, I'm just going to find out where they are going and hook up with them later.

                                      ASE certified parts specialist.
                                      2004 Impala LS 3.8

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • 2wheeler2 Offline
                                        2wheeler2 Offline
                                        2wheeler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #43

                                        Awwwww......silly cars.

                                        The NLR bikes.

                                        legacy image

                                        1.2X 60's
                                        7.1X ETs
                                        20X Traps

                                        Stock block, stock displacement, hand clutch, DOT tire, no bars, lights, streetable.

                                        '08 Suzuki Hayabusa
                                        '09 Yamaha Zuma 200cc
                                        '95 E-350 7.5L

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • wesholeW Offline
                                          wesholeW Offline
                                          weshole
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #44

                                          2wheeler;246485 wrote:
                                          Awwwww......silly cars.

                                          The NLR bikes.

                                          legacy image

                                          1.2X 60's
                                          7.1X ETs
                                          20X Traps

                                          Stock block, stock displacement, hand clutch, DOT tire, no bars, lights, streetable.

                                          SLOW!!!!!



                                          [SIZE=3]Put those lil things away Ethan. Someones gonna loose an eye. [/SIZE]

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups