Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fargostreet.com

  1. Home
  2. Off Topic
  3. Run Your Mouth
  4. Stimulus Package

Stimulus Package

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Run Your Mouth
28 Posts 15 Posters 3.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ruthless351R Offline
    ruthless351R Offline
    ruthless351
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    If they give me money....sure i'll spend it. Hope its more this time. 🙂

    legacy image

    Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car
    Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall
    Torque is how far you take the wall with you

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MisterCMKM Offline
      MisterCMKM Offline
      MisterCMK
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      SPANISH-RICE;258713 wrote:
      You guys being sarcastic?

      No. I am serious, I am glad that we finally have a president who isn't going to sit there with blinders on and pretend things are all hunky dory.

      FASTER THAN DUBBSY

      > thrash;315544 wrote:
      > I noticed that the new 5.0 valve covers say "Ford Motorsport" or something on them. Instead, the valvecovers should be a big bald eagle, holding a rifle in one talon, an american flag in the other, eating apple pie, and shitting on the outline of europe.
      >
      > Ford is back :)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • zbrownZ Offline
        zbrownZ Offline
        zbrown
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        MisterCMK;258717 wrote:
        No. I am serious, I am glad that we finally have a president who isn't going to sit there with blinders on and pretend things are all hunky dory.

        just to make the situation worse +1

        rx7-8.89@157mph
        12v dodge, twins

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • integra_gsr98I Offline
          integra_gsr98I Offline
          integra_gsr98
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          I look forward to putting my future children and their children in to debt. I think it's fantastic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • zbrownZ Offline
            zbrownZ Offline
            zbrown
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            integra_gsr98;258719 wrote:
            I look forward to putting my future children and their children in to debt. I think it's fantastic.

            comon, it is not even a trillion yet

            rx7-8.89@157mph
            12v dodge, twins

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • no_slow_clapN Offline
              no_slow_clapN Offline
              no_slow_clap
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              i cant stand these things. i payed in last year, and didnt even get a stimulus check.

              doesnt look like bush was in a huge hurry then. who know's, maybe obama can get shit straightened out eventually.

              EVOLUTION VIII

              > ryanherington;4648360 wrote:
              > I think I'm gonna stop by Autozone and get a "worthy-amount" meter. My car might not put down enough worhty, and I don't wanna get in the way.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ParkerP Offline
                ParkerP Offline
                Parker
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                im sure he will get things straightened out.... i mean, look at all the great decisions he is making... like Tom Daschle, who he picked to be secretary of health and human services.... and lets not forget Nancy Killefer, Obama’s choice to be the government's first “chief performance officer"... with great decisions like that, how could we go wrong with Obama!!!!

                10 Jeep
                10 F450
                08 F250
                05 F350
                86 rx7
                70 F100
                63 Olds

                > BlueSRT0483;244555 wrote:
                > As proven by Parker... Not everything you read on the internet is true.
                > Trafik Jamz;260984 wrote:
                > You are right Parker.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • PSiedTSiP Offline
                  PSiedTSiP Offline
                  PSiedTSi
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Uncle Sam is sure stimulating my pocket this tax season :). $600 stimulus ftw.

                  At first I did it for fun, then I realized I made the investment and had to do it!

                  92 Talon AWD 6/4bolt [EMAIL="[email protected]"][email protected][/EMAIL]
                  95 240SX SE SR20DET [EMAIL="[email protected]"][email protected][/EMAIL]
                  1993.5 Supra Hardtop...Sold
                  Next project? 6cyl, 6spd?

                  > spanish-rice;237125 wrote:
                  > at first i thought the title said beer truck drivers needed... In which case i accidently put my two weeks in at work.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • no_slow_clapN Offline
                    no_slow_clapN Offline
                    no_slow_clap
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Parker;258724 wrote:
                    im sure he will get things straightened out.... i mean, look at all the great decisions he is making... like Tom Daschle, who he picked to be secretary of health and human services.... and lets not forget Nancy Killefer, Obama’s choice to be the government's first “chief performance officer"... with great decisions like that, how could we go wrong with Obama!!!!

                    I said "maybe" and "eventually"

                    not like i voted for this guy.

                    PSiedTSi;258726 wrote:
                    Uncle Sam is sure stimulating my pocket this tax season :). $600 stimulus ftw.

                    Im going to bet that good ol' Uncle Sam is going to give me the bro treatment gr1p style this year...again.

                    EVOLUTION VIII

                    > ryanherington;4648360 wrote:
                    > I think I'm gonna stop by Autozone and get a "worthy-amount" meter. My car might not put down enough worhty, and I don't wanna get in the way.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ParkerP Offline
                      ParkerP Offline
                      Parker
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      no_slow_clap;258727 wrote:
                      I said "maybe" and "eventually"

                      not like i voted for this guy.

                      you need to watch the fuckin news or read a paper....:icon_rr:

                      10 Jeep
                      10 F450
                      08 F250
                      05 F350
                      86 rx7
                      70 F100
                      63 Olds

                      > BlueSRT0483;244555 wrote:
                      > As proven by Parker... Not everything you read on the internet is true.
                      > Trafik Jamz;260984 wrote:
                      > You are right Parker.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • no_slow_clapN Offline
                        no_slow_clapN Offline
                        no_slow_clap
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Parker;258728 wrote:
                        you need to watch the fuckin news or read a paper....:icon_rr:

                        agreed.

                        im 103% sure i miss understood every part of your post, and still fail to see if you are being sarcastic or not.

                        Oh well. Carry on.

                        EVOLUTION VIII

                        > ryanherington;4648360 wrote:
                        > I think I'm gonna stop by Autozone and get a "worthy-amount" meter. My car might not put down enough worhty, and I don't wanna get in the way.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • GrrG Offline
                          GrrG Offline
                          Grr
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          fantastic

                          2006 Trailblazer SS- my DD
                          2002 Camaro- built N/A LS3, Flt level 5 trans, 8.8 rear

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ParkerP Offline
                            ParkerP Offline
                            Parker
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            i give up.... i need a bail out....

                            10 Jeep
                            10 F450
                            08 F250
                            05 F350
                            86 rx7
                            70 F100
                            63 Olds

                            > BlueSRT0483;244555 wrote:
                            > As proven by Parker... Not everything you read on the internet is true.
                            > Trafik Jamz;260984 wrote:
                            > You are right Parker.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Offline
                              T Offline
                              Trafik Jamz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              I'm against the bill (actually more against the pork inside the bill) as it is written. If it is for infrastructure, energy grid, etc... then I am ok with it generally speaking. What I am not ok with is the crap that is getting tied into it...some by the dems for stupid shit, some as incentives to bring the republicans on board.

                              Things I like that have been proposed:

                              *Tax cuts/rebates for businesses.
                              *Energy Grid upgrades
                              *Roads/Bridges/Etc... repairs
                              *Stimulus checks....even for those who didn't necessarily pay in huge amounts or got everything they paid in to income tax back...remember, they still paid in to social security and various other taxes and they made enough to have to file in the first place. I don't think they should get the full amount that higher wage earners did, but I think they would be the ones most likely to spend it which is what we want.
                              *Anything that can create/save a job long term. I don't necessarily want more federal gov't employees (which I'll admit will likely happen) I'm hoping that a good share of these jobs will be in the private sector.

                              I find it hard to believe that some people think it is patriotic to send billions and billions of dollars to Iraq every month to stabilize their country/economy/infrastructure, yet somehow think it is unpatriotic/socialist to invest that money at home. Maybe it is socialism, but I'd rather see Zach Brown/Parker Skolness/Chris Karpesh/Chuck Schwan/Dave Henry/Matt Faul/Bill Olander get some of their tax money back (either directly or through improvements in their communities) than see Abdul Jihad-Amakickurazi get another fucking penny. If we can do without government intervention, so can they. Pull out, let them deal with it the democratic way. If they can't, fuck 'em, let them stimulate their own economy.

                              Continuing with the rant...I've gone on record saying I think a flat tax (flat percentage) is fair. I still believe that. But what I'm having a hard time swallowing is the "Bush tax cut" for the wealthiest Americans and how it was supposed to create jobs. I just didn't see that happen. I saw tax cuts create wealthier people (this is a good thing), but not more jobs (this is a not so good thing). So I ask this...where did it go wrong? The tax rates were lower than they were during the Reagan years, so why didn't Reaganomics work this time? Please don't read this as me bashing Reagan/tax cuts, I'm asking a serious question that I'd appreciate a serious answer on (IOW, thrash...please respond).

                              Auto Starts from $200 Installed! Lifetime warranty.

                              701.541.3484

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DelSlowD Offline
                                DelSlowD Offline
                                DelSlow
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Obama thread FTW.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • DaveHD Offline
                                  DaveHD Offline
                                  DaveH
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  Trafik Jamz;258742 wrote:
                                  Continuing with the rant...I've gone on record saying I think a flat tax (flat percentage) is fair. I still believe that. But what I'm having a hard time swallowing is the "Bush tax cut" for the wealthiest Americans and how it was supposed to create jobs. I just didn't see that happen. I saw tax cuts create wealthier people (this is a good thing), but not more jobs (this is a not so good thing). So I ask this...where did it go wrong? The tax rates were lower than they were during the Reagan years, so why didn't Reaganomics work this time? Please don't read this as me bashing Reagan/tax cuts, I'm asking a serious question that I'd appreciate a serious answer on (IOW, thrash...please respond).

                                  There is the old saying, figures lie and liars figure. You can take any years job gain/loss numbers and make them look the way you want. The repubs will say that lots of jobs were created, the libs will say jobs were lost. Both will be looking at the same numbers.

                                  So I have to go with what makes sense... if people keep more of their money they are probably going to spend it (a few might just put it in savings I spose) and spending it on products and services means there is a need for people to create those products and services.

                                  The alternative is giving more to the Govt, and IMO they already spend waaaaay too much....

                                  DaveH
                                  '94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph

                                  legacy image

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • GarageAlchemistG Offline
                                    GarageAlchemistG Offline
                                    GarageAlchemist
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Trafik Jamz;258742 wrote:
                                    I'm against the bill (actually more against the pork inside the bill) as it is written. If it is for infrastructure, energy grid, etc... then I am ok with it generally speaking. What I am not ok with is the crap that is getting tied into it...some by the dems for stupid shit, some as incentives to bring the republicans on board.

                                    Things I like that have been proposed:

                                    *Tax cuts/rebates for businesses.
                                    *Energy Grid upgrades
                                    *Roads/Bridges/Etc... repairs
                                    *Stimulus checks....even for those who didn't necessarily pay in huge amounts or got everything they paid in to income tax back...remember, they still paid in to social security and various other taxes and they made enough to have to file in the first place. I don't think they should get the full amount that higher wage earners did, but I think they would be the ones most likely to spend it which is what we want.
                                    *Anything that can create/save a job long term. I don't necessarily want more federal gov't employees (which I'll admit will likely happen) I'm hoping that a good share of these jobs will be in the private sector.

                                    I find it hard to believe that some people think it is patriotic to send billions and billions of dollars to Iraq every month to stabilize their country/economy/infrastructure, yet somehow think it is unpatriotic/socialist to invest that money at home. Maybe it is socialism, but I'd rather see Zach Brown/Parker Skolness/Chris Karpesh/Chuck Schwan/Dave Henry/Matt Faul/Bill Olander get some of their tax money back (either directly or through improvements in their communities) than see Abdul Jihad-Amakickurazi get another fucking penny. If we can do without government intervention, so can they. Pull out, let them deal with it the democratic way. If they can't, fuck 'em, let them stimulate their own economy.

                                    Continuing with the rant...I've gone on record saying I think a flat tax (flat percentage) is fair. I still believe that. But what I'm having a hard time swallowing is the "Bush tax cut" for the wealthiest Americans and how it was supposed to create jobs. I just didn't see that happen. I saw tax cuts create wealthier people (this is a good thing), but not more jobs (this is a not so good thing). So I ask this...where did it go wrong? The tax rates were lower than they were during the Reagan years, so why didn't Reaganomics work this time? Please don't read this as me bashing Reagan/tax cuts, I'm asking a serious question that I'd appreciate a serious answer on (IOW, thrash...please respond).

                                    Reganomics didn't work because this time around because the extra money saved on taxes by big business didn't go back into their businesses. They didn't use the money to expand and grow, they used it to pad their bank account, and then after that sent even more jobs overseas. Its going to be impossible for us to grow as an economic entity if we keep buying overseas and shipping the jobs from our country overseas to save money.
                                    Id say, if Joe Blow CEO makes a couple million dollars less a year by not outsourcing some tech support jobs, well then thats more help than Joe making more money. Obviously my opinion is not shared by most companies and CEO's today.
                                    The little man will either save, or not save this economy, and the government can throw as much money at the economy as they want, if we the people don't want to spend our money, or of we cannot make money to spend, then it will fall.

                                    97 GTi, 03 KJ

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • DelSlowD Offline
                                      DelSlowD Offline
                                      DelSlow
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22
                                      This post is deleted!
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        Trafik Jamz
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        I see things the way Heath does on this. The banks have proven this with the bailout they received. Did they create more loans? Did they invest in their communities? Did they refi adjustable rate loans? No! They stuck it in their pockets in the form of bonuses/ incentives. I say leave the tax cuts in place for the "rich" and lower taxes on the "poor" and "middle"... Then watch how that class puts the money back into the economy. I bet the "rich" make more money when the "poor" buy their products.

                                        Auto Starts from $200 Installed! Lifetime warranty.

                                        701.541.3484

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 24valvenotak2 Offline
                                          24valvenotak2 Offline
                                          24valvenotak
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          banks buying other banks with bailout money is bad.

                                          how many banks merged/were aquired in 08? 7 banks bought 7 other banks. 7 more were bought out in 07.

                                          jp morgan bought two. lets start talking about redistribution of wealth again so he tries to overthrow the govt once more... oh snap.

                                          Getcher green hat, we are goin fishin.

                                          > 63vette;288530 wrote:
                                          > I dont know shit about building cars.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups