the Fairness Doctrine
-
DaveH;260856 wrote:
Thats because the Limbaugh show isn't about the callers views, it's about his.Yup....cheerleading, IMO he is the most entertaining, but least informational (aside from Hannity) of the right wing talkers.
-
oh...forgot the
/stir /stir /stir
-
This post is deleted!
-
Trafik Jamz;260797 wrote:
What I think is funny is that this subject never even comes up unless it is brought up by the right wing talk radio hosts. T
MMMK, that is why Schultz and Colmes where bitching about it today too:rolleyes:Fuck Rush, I enjoy Andrew Wilkow more than anyone these days
-
Of course they are going to talk about it now...it's their job to respond to these things. I know that Schultz is a fan of it, and it stems from when he was selected to have his show broadcast to the troops in Iraq on the military radio channel (I forget the actual name of it) but somehow, the day it was supposed to be a go, they canceled his contract for undisclosed reasons. If ever there was a case that there should be both sides, I'd say it should be in a limited market such as that. Schultz feels that he was removed because he was critical of Bush. Whether that is true or not...who knows?
-
really? that surprises me...
-
Trafik Jamz;260871 wrote:
really? that surprises me...ya him and colmes both
If this ever happened, it would have the opposite effect desired anyway (cough stimulus plan cough)
It would lead to less air time for both as it would be easier for the stations to just change format than put up with the bullshit
-
Is this going back to him walking off set? I still think he did the right thing.
-
Chuck you are a good debater, too bad you are not smart enough to choose the right side in any debate. And by right i mean correct, and republican.
-
Schultz is a joke, he was there to debate and put forward his point. Instead, he acted like a 5 yr old girl (ask me how I know) and ran away. On the original thread about this I posted the video where Schultz was talking over other people in a similar type of debate, so the argument that he was being talked over is a joke. There are only two options:
- he's a crybaby
- he intentionally did it because he was on Fox.
DaveH
'94 Supra- 7.77 @ 176mph -
And for Shultz to get in the front row of Obama's first press conference...Does that not make anybody mad/question anything?
And Chuck, just say you are a far left loon and get it over with. There's no need for you to explain your side every time when you know everybody on here except DelSlow will disagree with you.
-
Wait...I say that I think Schultz was justified in walking away and that makes me far left? I'd have said the same if Rush did it. I've said I'm NOT in favor of the fairness doctrine and that makes me a lefty? I've said I'm for LESS gov't spending and I'm a lefty? I point out things that the right has done to destroy the constitution and provide links and I'm a lefty socialist hell bent on destroying the constitution? I've said I'm all for gun owners rights (I have more "assault weapons" than most people including AK's, SKS's, AR-15's), but I openly ask where the limit on the 2nd amendment comes into play and I'm a lefty? I'm for a flat tax and i'm a lefty? I'm for lower taxes for everyone and I'm a left wing loon? I'm for gradual privatization of social security, and you think this is socialist somehow? I am pretty much pro-life (except in rare circumstances) and I'm too far left for you?
What I am in favor of, in this economic climate, is some form of stimulus from the gov't to help stave off a recession. Do I think that EVERY part of the latest package is good? FUCK NO! But I am willing to bet I can't find a single spending bill in washington that I'd agree with 100%, regardless of who proposed it. I'm in favor of trying NEW things instead of the same old shit (Sorry, tax cuts won't bring us out of this recession on their own). I'm in favor of regulation of industries, but not to the point of hindering them (I work in a heavily regulated industry, it HELPS my company by keeping the trunk slammers out who have no knowledge of what they are doing.)
Torbs, I believe that your beliefs can be summed up in two words "Glen Beck"
-
Trafik Jamz;260913 wrote:
Wait...I say that I think Schultz was justified in walking away and that makes me far left? I'd have said the same if Rush did it. I've said I'm NOT in favor of the fairness doctrine and that makes me a lefty? I've said I'm for LESS gov't spending and I'm a lefty? I point out things that the right has done to destroy the constitution and provide links and I'm a lefty socialist hell bent on destroying the constitution? I've said I'm all for gun owners rights (I have more "assault weapons" than most people including AK's, SKS's, AR-15's), but I openly ask where the limit on the 2nd amendment comes into play and I'm a lefty? I'm for a flat tax and i'm a lefty? I'm for lower taxes for everyone and I'm a left wing loon? I'm for gradual privatization of social security, and you think this is socialist somehow? I am pretty much pro-life (except in rare circumstances) and I'm too far left for you?What I am in favor of, in this economic climate, is some form of stimulus from the gov't to help stave off a recession. Do I think that EVERY part of the latest package is good? FUCK NO! But I am willing to bet I can't find a single spending bill in washington that I'd agree with 100%, regardless of who proposed it. I'm in favor of trying NEW things instead of the same old shit (Sorry, tax cuts won't bring us out of this recession on their own). I'm in favor of regulation of industries, but not to the point of hindering them (I work in a heavily regulated industry, it HELPS my company by keeping the trunk slammers out who have no knowledge of what they are doing.)
Torbs, I believe that your beliefs can be summed up in two words "Glen Beck"
A good stimulus would have been permanent tax cuts or changing the system alltogether (something like the FairTax IMO). And I'm not the only one that has ever accused you of siding with the left so don't even go there...To say this stimulus is good at all is rediculus. There wasn't even a debate or anything. The Democrats and Obama broke their 48 hour of visibility promise. People regret voting for the Patriot Act and wish they would have read it prior to voting for it...Same thing is going to happen with this. You would think that people would learn from their past mistakes.
Chuck, I believe that your beliefs can be summed up in 5 words "Typing more makes me right."
And it's Glenn...if you are going to use it against me at least spell it correctly.
-
he wasn't worth the effort for the extra "n"
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login